metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Since when and where are doctors supposedly forced to perform abortions?Forcing people to provide abortions (or another morally objectionable act) is prohibiting the free exercise of their religion.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Since when and where are doctors supposedly forced to perform abortions?Forcing people to provide abortions (or another morally objectionable act) is prohibiting the free exercise of their religion.
"Free exercise" does have recognized limits...even by many
of the faithful, eg, genital mutilation of girls, honor killings.
Being forced to provide differs from being forced to perform.
Does the latter happen?
Since when and where are doctors supposedly forced to perform abortions?
Show me evidence that a doctor must perform and abortion even against his will?Plan B mandates go back to Obama care. This law includes similar provisions to compel people to violate their religious beliefs.
Show me evidence that a doctor must perform and abortion even against his will?
Plan B is not an abortifacient.Plan B mandates go back to Obama care. This law includes similar provisions to compel people to violate their religious beliefs.
And that's an abortion, how?From the article cited in the OP
"The bill would create a federal right for people to access contraceptives and for doctors and pharmacists to provide them."
A "right" does not mean nor imply that it's "compulsory", so again you simply are inventing nonsense.From the article cited in the OP
"The bill would create a federal right for people to access contraceptives and for doctors and pharmacists to provide them."
Wasn't there an issue with Catholic health systems over being forced to provide abortion services years ago?Show me evidence that a doctor must perform and abortion even against his will?
There should be a federal right to personal choice, and eliminate all nanny state mandates that affect personal choice. Not just abortions.From the article cited in the OP
"The bill would create a federal right for people to access contraceptives and for doctors and pharmacists to provide them."
A "right" does not mean nor imply that it's "compulsory", so again you simply are inventing nonsense.
There should be a federal right to personal choice, and eliminate all nanny state mandates that affect personal choice. Not just abortions.
"Right" does not mean "compulsory". Just because I have the right of protest does not mean that I have compulsory to protest. Capice?And once again you put narrative over fact.
So can we end all laws on who can have sex with who? Does this include children?
Can we end laws on what kind of weapons I get to have?
Can we end laws on what I can do on my property?
End vaccine mandates, airport searches, anti discrimination laws, special tax previsions etc?
"Right" does not mean "compulsory". Just because I have the right of protest does not mean that I have compulsory to protest. Capice?
And I asked you to provide evidence that a doctor must perform an abortion even against his/her will, and yet again you cannot do it. I'm not the problem here, so let me recommend that you get over your own ego and try to deal with the facts.
To put it bluntly, you simply do not care what the "Truth" is if it conflicts with your own predetermined beliefs as we've seen on so many of your posts, thus having an intelligent discussion with you is darn near impossible.
That latter sentence doesn't make any sense whatsoever, including in the context under discussion, so I'm clearly just wasting my time with this.The "right to" bare arms does not force me to be armed. But if have a "right" for you to sell me a gun. You are forced.
Can you provide text in the bill that would requireFrom the article cited in the OP
"The bill would create a federal right for people to access contraceptives and for doctors and pharmacists to provide them."
Can you provide text in the bill that would require
that a doctor who doesn't do abortions would be
forced to do them?
As for pharmacists, they're only providing the drug.
The customer would perform the abortion by taking it.
More easily.I don't have the text of the bill I was going off of the OP resource.
So to put on their shoes for a moment. I'm not required to pull the trigger, just supply you with ammo for you school shooting so I can sleep well at night???
More easily.
We all pay taxes for things we oppose.
That's less onerous than having to
perform things we oppose.