Explain why omniscience precludes free will. Explain why the existence of anybody at all that can predict the future perfectly tells us that the universe is deterministic.
It's been done repeatedly. I don't think it would be helpful to do it again.
Ask yourself how one could distinguish between a deterministic world and one where the future is not yet determined.
In pinball, a seemingly random 2-digit number ending in zero appears when the game ends, and if they are the same as the last two digits of your score, you win a free game:
"A Match Sequence is a
Pinball game mechanic where, at the end of a game, the last two digits of the players' scores (which will always be a multiple of 10) is compared against a
random two-digit number (also a multiple of 10). If a player's digits match the game's, a free game is awarded (indicated with the
infamous knocker sound). The match bonus was first introduced in 1957, using the single digit of the scores;
score inflation eventually elevated the match to the last two digits."
Notice the word random in there. I had a favorite machine that I played most days, and I discovered how to match every time. If the numbers were random, I would only match 1 time in 10 on average, but I was able to match every time. What must be true for me to be able to do that?
Then go into any court of law and tell the judge and jury that the defendant is not guilty because humans have no free will.
I didn't say that man has no free will. What I said is that if his "choices" are as predictable as the pinball machine's "choice," then no choice is actually being made and although his will may feel free to him, if it can be predicted perfectly, it's as deterministic as the algorithm the pinball machine uses and which I discovered.
What you stated is only a personal opinion.
I wrote, "Gratuitous suffering rules out a good god." The truth of that statement depends on how we define those words. Maybe good doesn't mean the same thing to you as it does to me.
Nobody can ever know if God is good or if God is all-loving.
Nobody knows anything about gods, including whether any exist, and if so, what their qualities are. But we can judge the goodness of the character described even if it is fictional. Batman was a good guy, but not the Joker.
My choice would be no. I would reject the invitation.
You recognize and admit people are free to make choices but you want to ignore that preferring instead to blame God for it.
I'm an atheist. I don't blame gods for anything. But if a god exists that has the power to prevent or reverse gratuitous suffering but can't be bothered, yes, I would blame it for that.
You would too if you didn't believe that it exists, reads your mind, and punishes thought crimes. I don't have to worry about that, so I'm free to make common sense judgments about good and bad and right and wrong. Your choice is made for you.
Suffering is usually caused by humans who refused to obey God.
Who told you that? I don't obey your god or any other gods, and I don't suffer at all beyond a little heartburn, sniffles during allergy season, a little arthritis, and the rare headache.
Right now, there is severe hail falling in the American Midwest. The animals are suffering. Is that because they refused to obey your god?
God has no right to ask you to love Him
I've never heard from a god. And how does one love a ghost he never encounters?
You will be yourself with all your quirks and memories, and you will continue to be active forever, millennia after hundreds of millennia.
You're guessing.