No it doesn't, it just makes unevidenced claims, do you think the Harry Potter novels are evidence for magic?
The Bible is not a book written by a single author, so one author can verify another.
The miracles of Jesus are verified by the writers of the gospels and the other aspects of Jesus life also. But really it is the unquestioned existence of Paul and his proximity to the life of Jesus which verifies the life and death of Jesus.
There are no witness accounts or any sources in the gospels, only hearsay claims written long after the events they claim to depict, and by anonymous authors. Paul neither knew nor met Jesus. Hearing about someone's death isn't evidence for a resurrection, why would it be?
Paul is a witness to the resurrection only in his claim to have met the risen Jesus.
Of course you believe the gospels were hearsay claims written long after the events and by anonymous authors. That is the sceptic position but it denies the evidence of history as to the authors of the gospels and denies the internal evidence in the New Testament itself concerning their dates being writing.
The sceptic position relies on sceptic bias concerning the prophecy about the destruction of the temple and so the dates and so authorship taken as after 70AD.
This is a presumed dating system (tossing out other evidence) and is circular reasoning.