Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How do you know it's a copy, if it's the oldest scrap in existence?
{"Holy Qur'an Tells The Truth About Physical Resurrection OF Jesus (Peace Be Upon Him)}
"That they (the wrong-doers) said (in boast), 'We killed the Christ Jesus son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah';- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them [or it appeared so unto them], and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not: Nay, Allah raised him up unto Himself; and Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise."
Hi, I humbly respect that your scriptures teach Jesus was not crucified. Of course as a Christian, I believe he was. Without going into it too deeply, I simply believe the eyewitness accounts of those present at the time, I believe they were accurate and true and passed down to us in our Bible. I know many do not believe that and that's fine. I simply believe, as one would in a court of law, the eyewitnesses as opposed to another scripture, which I do respect, that came 500 some years later and said he was not crucified. I believe the accounts closer to the actual event to be stronger evidence. Thanks.
And For Your Information Sir "Muhammad (PBUH) was the messenger of God As Jesus was the messenger of god and you can confirm about jesus from the references i have made and if god will be with you then you will find the truth. I can also provide you more refrences from bible
i agree that there should be no trinity and through my interpretation of the scriptures, do not believe that the bible teaches of such.
but i DO believe that jesus is the son of god, made flesh here on earth, was crucified, rose from the dead and returned to his father in heaven as planned, for the atonement for our sins.
its from the same way that you believe that he is not. faith in my belief, just as you have in yours. the bible DOES teach that jesus is the son of god. research if interested. no need for me to quote biblical scriptures to you, for they would fall on deaf ears, just as your quran scriptures are to me..
Dear Sniper now only thing can i say is i don't ask you to change your religon because i will get no profit from this "It is only for the goodness of you that you struggle to find what is the real truth because it is your sole responsibility to find what is the truth of religon its not a simple thing you must answer about it in your life after death."
My concern was only to give you a clu now find truth yourself i recommend you that first you study bible whole heartedly with your open mind inshallah your mind will ask you questions about what you beleive and then I strongly Recommend you that you also read Holy Qur'an inshallah i beleive that if god wants to get you in light you will easily understand the loud and clear message of Almighty Allah that he is only one.
"May God Be With You"
In the book of Acts, Philip comes upon a man reading from Isaiah 53 and shows him how the Old Testament Prophets prophecied of Jesus and how he would suffer and die for our sins. Basicaly there are hundreds of Old Testament prophecies that Jesus fulfilled:
Well then I guess you are "no true Muslim ."I READ until i came to this verse pertaining to unbelievers
2-191. And slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out;
THIS IS NOT MY BELIEF IN HOW TO DEAL WITH NONBELIEVERS OF MY FAITH
They were not discounted. I simply pointed out possible flaws in them. Also, that does not mean that a bodily resurrection is the most likely. That is a logical fallacy. Just because A isn't the answer, that doesn't mean that B is the answer.Not according to the OP, they discounted the alternatives in the OP.
Not entirely true. All of the Gospels were circulated anonymously. We don't know who wrote Mark of Luke either. Whether or not they were disciples of the apostles, we don't know for sure. The reason being that only tradition tells us who the Gospels were written by. And that tradition really didn't start until the second century.The authors were not eyewitnesses. That is complete nonsense. Mark was a disciple of Peter, we don't even know who wrote Matthew, Luke was a disciple of Paul, and John definitely didn't write John.