• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Situation in Egypt

What I want to change your mind about is the timing of the discussion. It was actually pretty open in 2001-3. No one uttered a peep.

I found the whole thing pretty repellent, and actually wrote a letter to the editor of my newspaper about it. The gist was that TRUE 'ticking bomb' situations are extremely rare, and self-defined. If you ever do find yourself in a situation where a flesh-and-blood kidnap victim is running out of air, or a bomb truly set to explode, you or me or Mother Theresa will probably do what we have to, to end the menace, because that's the way the categorical imperative points. But Dershowitz - and the others, this is just one example - were talking about situations that were much more ephemeral and problematic, and that just won't do.

But no one said a word. The discussions didn't start until FIVE years after the fact, in 2007, and with an incredible amount of moralizing. Not every one knows this, but waterboarding is actually part of standard training for American Special Forces, to give the candidate some idea of the limits of his endurance. I know a Navy SEAL who underwent it. He describes it as pretty much an ordeal, and he definitely thinks it should NOT be used as an interrogation technique. But he also doesn't see it as Nuremberg stuff - after all, he's hale and healthy, as are the THREE (!) - that's all - subjects of CIA interrogation. Dershowitz, on the other hand, was talking about the Real Thing, missing fingernails, scars, worse, and suggesting that it was all perfectly OK. Pretty unsettling, and none of the latter-day critics saying a word, though they were all around.

Do we have a policy hole that has to be plugged? You betcha. Whether or not waterboarding is torture - I think John Yoo was influenced a lot that it was part of military training, and how could that be torture - we shouldn't do it. Do we have a major scandal? Not really. Not that much happened.

But apparently a mild version what the critics couldn't be bothered to answer when the matter was topical becomes - years after the fact - when it's safe - so horrible that Heads Must Roll. It is the smug sanctimoniousness of this that bugs me. Speak up when it matters. I did.
 

kai

ragamuffin
wow, he is still there i really thought how was going just goes to show how wrong the media speculation can be, what now ? when the army says it was standing ready to "protect the nation". "its gains and the aspirations of the people". what does that mean? i tell you this Mubarak wouldn't still be there if he never had Army support that much must be obvious.
 
Last edited:

Alceste

Vagabond
GR, I have been a vocal opponent of war, rendition, torture, the suspension of habeus corpus, the Halliburton subcontract slave trade, warrantless wire-tapping, repressive legislation like the Patriot Act, the school of the Americas (where aspiring Latin American torturers go to learn their chops), fabricated "evidence" for war and countless other facets of America's incompetent and dangerous world leadership for my entire adult life.

Just because you weren't looking for it doesn't mean dissent wasn't there. Put Glenn Greenwald, Chris Floyd, Greg Palast and Harpers magazine on your RSS feed so you don't miss out next time around. :)
 

EiNsTeiN

Boo-h!
wow, he is still there i really thought how was going just goes to show how wrong the media speculation can be, what now ? when the army says it was standing ready to "protect the nation". "its gains and the aspirations of the people". what does that mean? i tell you this Mubarak wouldn't still be there if he never had Army support that much must be obvious.

This is all crazy!
Mubarak is fighting till his last breathe!
The army should now interfer, because otherwise, things would escalate in a scary way!
 

kai

ragamuffin
This is all crazy!
Mubarak is fighting till his last breathe!
The army should now interfer, because otherwise, things would escalate in a scary way!

EiNstTein i have to ask, dont you think Mubarak is in contact with the Army ?They must be talking?
 

EiNsTeiN

Boo-h!
Yeah, they are talking for sure.

We thought the army was trying to reach a compromise that would satisfy the people as well as guaruntee an honorable departure for him.

However, his speech is totally confusing, and contradicts all the political expectations, especially those related to the army.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Yeah, they are talking for sure.

We thought the army was trying to reach a compromise that would satisfy the people as well as guaruntee an honorable departure for him.

However, his speech is totally confusing, and contradicts all the political expectations, especially those related to the army.
I can't help but wonder just how naive you are, EiNsTeiN. (I don't mean that in a bad way, either, more as a statement of fact.) The military has supported Mubarak for decades. What makes you think they are not supporting him now? Quite obviously they are. My guess is that together they are desperately trying to figure out how to minimize casualties, while determining what would be an acceptable body count. The uprising cannot be allowed to continue. All things considered I think Mubarak & company have shown incredible restraint and with each moment that passes that becomes more dangerous.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
I am hearing reports that the army is divided. Many of the senior officers are Mubarak's close friends. But most of the junior officers think he should go.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
I am hearing reports that the army is divided. Many of the senior officers are Mubarak's close friends. But most other officers think he should go.
Well, we know how accurate "reports" have been up to this point, don't we.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Some have been accurate. Some have not. Only time will tell whether or not this one is.
Government downfall and a military revolt. Ugh... Not a pretty prospect. All within a political vacuum. That's fricken great.
 

EiNsTeiN

Boo-h!
You can't stand in front of 20 million angry Egyptians, don't you?!
The army would get in troubles fighting the people.

I'm more into the thought that the army is confused and not able to think clearly. The army would favour the people, but needs also to ensure an honorable departure to Mubarak, as well as maintain the stability of the country.

It's not an easy equation!
 

kai

ragamuffin
You can't stand in front of 20 million angry Egyptians, don't you?!
The army would get in troubles fighting the people.

I'm more into the thought that the army is confused and not able to think clearly.
The army would favour the people, but needs also to ensure an honorable departure to Mubarak, as well as maintain the stability of the country.

It's not an easy equation!



so in the cold light of day , they back Mubarak leaving in September then?
 

Alceste

Vagabond
I am hearing reports that the army is divided. Many of the senior officers are Mubarak's close friends. But most of the junior officers think he should go.

The evidence seems to support this. The army is arresting and torturing civilians with one hand while it investigates the murder of civilians by security forces with the other.
 

kai

ragamuffin
It seems they thought Mubarak was leaving today, and he surprised them. Maybe they should have invited him to their strategy meetings.

I dont believe that Mubarak isn't consulting with the Army , if the Army is that fractious then thats another worry.
 
Top