• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Sun revolves the Earth!

s13ep

s13ep

42
Contrary to popular and academic belief, the Sun revolves the Earth, as well as, the Earth revolving the Sun.

The Sun is percieved in the day revolving the Earth; this Earthly sight is as significant as, the spatial sight of the Earth revolving the Sun.

It can be compared to a dream-state where the state of mind is perceived. Contrary to popular and academic belief that the dream is chemical reactions, alone.

It cannot be proven via word communication, but can be agreed upon via wise sense.

This would also mean that all academia is false.
 
Last edited:
s13ep

s13ep

42
An extract from a theory I'm writing that will not be published, but further I won't include the names, or comments, of contributors in this thread.

I would like to debate and discuss "academic one-ism", it also supports my claim that all of academia is false.

The extracts are as follows...

"Let's examine the number “1” as a concept; in truth, we cannot examine it. We can talk about it's attributes, and say, inter alia, 'solitary' and 'singular', but not sense “1”, logically. A physical number “1” is a single, solitary point; if we assume an observer, we assume falsity, for the observer is an addition that voids it's single and solitary nature. “1” cannot be observed, and is not observed.

One-ism is equal to death-worship, and false mathematics that leads to a false reality. To begin we name an object, such as a cigarette, “cigarette”, which is the beginning of one-ism, and then we consume the cigarette, which is the end of one-ism. As the number “1” is a false number, we can only trace it by production to consumption rate. We produce “1” by naming an object greater than “1”, and then we consume that object, presenting pseudo-evidence to our minds that “1” is logical. Production to consumption is linear, the falsity is treating the opposite factors of a linear equation as singular factors; the “produced” and “consumed” are at opposite ends of a line, and equate zero together- the only value of the produced and consumed is their opposite integrity. The “consumed production”, is the one-ism that is equal to death-worship; it's a unitary lie, that pseudo-individuality creates third singular factor, often called 'truth(s)' or 'fact(s)'. The truth of the matter is that humans create a second line after linear production to consumption, from consumption to “1”; a worship a false singularity concept."
 
Mycroft

Mycroft

Ministry of Serendipity
No.

Technically, what is going on is that the Earth, Sun and all the planets are orbiting around the center of mass of the solar system. This is actually how planets orbiting other stars are often detected, by searching for the motion of the stars they orbit that is caused by the fact that the star is orbiting the center of mass of the system, causing it to wobble on the sky.

The center of mass of our solar system very close to the Sun itself, but not exactly at the Sun's center (it is actually a little bit outside the radius of the Sun). However, since almost all of the mass within the solar system is contained in the Sun, its motion is only a slight wobble in comparison to the motion of the planets. Therefore, assuming that the Sun is stationary and the planets revolve around its center is a good enough approximation for most purposes.

/thread
 
s13ep

s13ep

42
I never said the Sun is stationary; if that's what you're arguing against, you've missed the point of the original post; that the Sun revolves the Earth, even with a wobble/ tilt.
Mycroft said:
No.

Technically, what is going on is that the Earth, Sun and all the planets are orbiting around the center of mass of the solar system. This is actually how planets orbiting other stars are often detected, by searching for the motion of the stars they orbit that is caused by the fact that the star is orbiting the center of mass of the system, causing it to wobble on the sky.

The center of mass of our solar system very close to the Sun itself, but not exactly at the Sun's center (it is actually a little bit outside the radius of the Sun). However, since almost all of the mass within the solar system is contained in the Sun, its motion is only a slight wobble in comparison to the motion of the planets. Therefore, assuming that the Sun is stationary and the planets revolve around its center is a good enough approximation for most purposes.

/thread
Click to expand...
 
Mycroft

Mycroft

Ministry of Serendipity
s13ep said:
I never said the Sun is stationary; if that's what you're arguing against, you've missed the point of the original post; that the Sun revolves the Earth, even with a wobble/ tilt.
Click to expand...

But it doesn't.
 
s13ep

s13ep

42
Mycroft said:
What's perception got to do with it?
Click to expand...
The effect of the day (Sun's revolution) is as significant as the cause of the day (Earth's revolution); alike the effect of dreams are as significant as the cause of dreams. As I said, one can only be agreed upon by wise sense.
 
Mycroft

Mycroft

Ministry of Serendipity
s13ep said:
The effect of the day (Sun's revolution) is as significant as the cause of the day (Earth's revolution); alike the effect of dreams are as significant as the cause of dreams. As I said, one can only be agreed upon by wise sense.
Click to expand...

No it can't, because the Sun in no way orbits the earth. Perception does not make something a fact.

For example I could perceive that you're a squirrel. But that does not make it a fact. Even though it probably is.
 
S

Smart_Guy

...
Premium Member
Well, the scientific explanations are taken as 100% perfectly convincing that the Earth goes around the Sun instead. Some people say those results are a perfect fact and some others chose that such results possibly are not 100% perfectly telling that the Earth goes around the Sun.

I chose to not be stubborn in either and accept different views.
 
s13ep

s13ep

42
It isn't a "fact", more properly called "the evident which can be communicated"- for there aren't wordless "facts" that can be communicated.

As I said, the perception of the Sun revolving the Earth can only be agreed upon by multiple, wise, senses, thus making it a "wordless-fact".

The Sun revolving the Earth is a "wordless-fact", but the wordless is not accepted by the common academician. Academicians want strict evidence for communicative purposes; perception alone and the subjective is 'farfetched' and 'unstable' to academicians. I, on the other hand, trust the human perception.

I believe a dream-state happens, and is not only the chemical reaction cause, but also the effect. The same logic applies where the Sun revolves the Earth.
 
FearGod

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
Mycroft said:
No it can't, because the Sun in no way orbits the earth. Perception does not make something a fact.

For example I could perceive that you're a squirrel. But that does not make it a fact. Even though it probably is.
Click to expand...

What's your irrefutable evidence that all planets aren't revolving around each other?
One day we thought the sun is stationary and later on we found out that the sun is moving as well.
 
Mycroft

Mycroft

Ministry of Serendipity
FearGod said:
What's your irrefutable evidence that all planets aren't revolving around each other?
One day we thought the sun is stationary and later on we found out that the sun is moving as well.
Click to expand...

Everything is in motion relative to something else. The solar system itself is orbiting the centre of the galaxy. Even the galaxy is in motion.
 
Laika

Laika

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
s13ep said:
Contrary to popular and academic belief, the Sun revolves the Earth, as well as, the Earth revolving the Sun.

The Sun is percieved in the day revolving the Earth; this Earthly sight is as significant as, the spatial sight of the Earth revolving the Sun.

It can be compared to a dream-state where the state of mind is perceived. Contrary to popular and academic belief that the dream is chemical reactions, alone.

It cannot be proven via word communication, but can be agreed upon via wise sense.

This would also mean that all academia is false.
Click to expand...

I thought I would add this to the thread, as it may help discussion. http://time.com/7809/1-in-4-americans-thinks-sun-orbits-earth/
 
FearGod

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
Mycroft said:
Everything is in motion relative to something else. The solar system itself is orbiting the centre of the galaxy. Even the galaxy is in motion.
Click to expand...

But there're different views, here's one view which makes sense to me but may not to you.

 
s13ep

s13ep

42
I separate myself from differing views and only assert that my theory is correct.

Anyone with a wise sense and scientific ability may agree with my theory.

I apologise if this sounds rude, but so does the academic mission of a barren Earth.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top