Mycroft
Ministry of Serendipity
Right. So, despite different views, the sun does not orbit the earth.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The Sun revolves the Earth!
- Thread starter s13ep
- Start date
Right. So, despite different views, the sun does not orbit the earth.
Insofar as gravity is concerned, the object with superior mass is the "anchor" entity. So no. The earth revolves around the sun, not the other way.
s13ep
42
This isn't applicable to the senses.
Mycroft
Ministry of Serendipity
What are you even talking about?
s13ep
42
The Sun and planets are not "entities" given "anchor logic", they are paired.
They both revolve each other; one negatively, the other positively.
The personal sense of the Sun revolving, again, is as significant as the impersonal knowledge of the Earth revolving.
s13ep
42
The opposite argument.
Mycroft
Ministry of Serendipity
Your argument is wrong.
"Entity" here is just another word for object. Mass is the defining factor. The sun has more mass than earth, therefore it's the anchor.
s13ep
42
It's probably not accurate to say that things revolve around one another...
1) The earth is falling into the sun, but at a rate where it falls past it and misses.
2) The sun is falling into the center of the milky way where there is a disgustingly large black hole. We'll never make it there either, for the same reason.
3) The milky way will collide with the andromeda galaxy because they are falling into one another, but the bad news is... They will actually collide and not miss.
4) At this point, does it matter?
1) The earth is falling into the sun, but at a rate where it falls past it and misses.
2) The sun is falling into the center of the milky way where there is a disgustingly large black hole. We'll never make it there either, for the same reason.
3) The milky way will collide with the andromeda galaxy because they are falling into one another, but the bad news is... They will actually collide and not miss.
4) At this point, does it matter?
s13ep
42
Resulting in humans rushing to a barren Earth.It's probably not accurate to say that things revolve around one another...
1) The earth is falling into the sun, but at a rate where it falls past it and misses.
2) The sun is falling into the center of the milky way where there is a disgustingly large black hole. We'll never make it there either, for the same reason.
3) The milky way will collide with the andromeda galaxy because they are falling into one another, but the bad news is... They will actually collide and not miss.
4) At this point, does it matter?
A classic example of academic mutation.
Mycroft
Ministry of Serendipity
No, because observation and evidence indicate it to be so.
Mycroft
Ministry of Serendipity
Please don't.
FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
Who said it's?
Because numerous people before Galileo, and 100% of credible thinkers since Galileo, say so. Do you have a degree in physics? Or better yet, astrophysics? No? I thought not.
Mycroft
Ministry of Serendipity
Basically every astronomer whose ever lived?
And not just because they say so, but because they have measured and observed it.
s13ep
42
This is an academic law on intelligence, that we must provide evidence through observation.
Observation alone is not enough, and the two must be used exclusively to have an intelligent view.
Observation proves the Sun's revolution, which is my point.
Evidence exists that the Earth revolves the Sun, my second point.
Observation under evidence means we would forget our senses for evidence-stupor.
I'll be back later. ; )
Observation alone is not enough, and the two must be used exclusively to have an intelligent view.
Observation proves the Sun's revolution, which is my point.
Evidence exists that the Earth revolves the Sun, my second point.
Observation under evidence means we would forget our senses for evidence-stupor.
I'll be back later. ; )