Why? It already has a title, Christmas.
Not in Australia, given that 'winter' is June-August.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why? It already has a title, Christmas.
Does Santa skip Australia?Not in Australia, given that 'winter' is June-August.
Because like @kerndog says, the unholy orgy of consumerism and indulgence that is currently labeled "Christ"mas is an embarrassment to the faithful. Push the holiday to a long weekend and save the actual day of Christmas for something a bit more reverent.Why? It already has a title, Christmas.
Because like @kerndog says, the unholy orgy of consumerism and indulgence that is currently labeled "Christ"mas is an embarrassment to the faithful. Push the holiday to a long weekend and save the actual day of Christmas for something a bit more reverent.
The current plan is kinda gross, don't you think?
Tom
Because like @kerndog says, the unholy orgy of consumerism and indulgence that is currently labeled "Christ"mas is an embarrassment to the faithful. Push the holiday to a long weekend and save the actual day of Christmas for something a bit more reverent.
The current plan is kinda gross, don't you think?
Tom
It's called Yule or Saturnalia. Christmas was invented by the Catholic church to replace the older pagan traditions.Why? It already has a title, Christmas.
It would be all encompassing for all religions and lack thereof.Why not just have a holiday called The Winter Festival?
That's silly. It's been called Christmas for a very long time, and the ''extra'' trappings are from various cultures, that simply added other decorations, etc., to the Christmas celebration. So, in some areas there would have been a tree, in other areas, not.....just examine your logic for a moment. Christmas is celebrated in areas that didn't have ''Yule'', or ''Saturnalia'', yet have the same standard holiday................hmmmmm............It's called Yule or Saturnalia. Christmas was invented by the Catholic church to replace the older pagan traditions.
Uh, no. The tree is a Pagan symbol, the Yule log is Pagan, the wreath is Pagan, mistletoe, and more. Not because they were added to Christmas, but because they were co-opted from an already existent holiday in order to easily convert people to Christianity. Christmas is supposedly to celebrate the birth of Jesus right? Who, according to bible scholars wasn't born anywhere near Dec 25. So why is it celebrated then? Because there were already holidays at that time that marked what? The birth/rise of the son/sun. Midwinter. The time which marks the longest night of the year and the gradual return of light. Of life. Of...the sun. Christmas hasn't been around as long as most of the other holidays during this time. It is not the original. It co-opted practices of originals.That's silly. It's been called Christmas for a very long time, and the ''extra'' trappings are from various cultures, that simply added other decorations, etc., to the Christmas celebration. So, in some areas there would have been a tree, in other areas, not.....just examine your logic for a moment. Christmas is celebrated in areas that didn't have ''Yule'', or ''Saturnalia'', yet have the same standard holiday................hmmmmm............
It's called cultural syncreticism. What happened was that people in various cultures reinterpreted their practices when they became Christianized. It wasn't some nefarious thing. It was just a natural occurrence that happens all the time. No one owns a symbol. A tree is just a tree. What that tree means to you is subjective. Christians in Central and South America, or Christians across Africa, Asia and so on wouldn't celebrate Christmas with the same cultural traditions as we in the Anglosphere do. Why? Because they have their own cultures and traditions. Christianity is pretty handy in that it can be adapted to any culture.Uh, no. The tree is a Pagan symbol, the Yule log is Pagan, the wreath is Pagan, mistletoe, and more. Not because they were added to Christmas, but because they were co-opted from an already existent holiday in order to easily convert people to Christianity. Christmas is supposedly to celebrate the birth of Jesus right? Who, according to bible scholars wasn't born anywhere near Dec 25. So why is it celebrated then? Because there were already holidays at that time that marked what? The birth/rise of the son/sun. Midwinter. The time which marks the longest night of the year and the gradual return of light. Of life. Of...the sun. Christmas hasn't been around as long as most of the other holidays during this time. It is not the original. It co-opted practices of originals.
It's pretty absurd for Christians to be offended by the absence of the word Christmas in stores, don't you think?
But that's really not how it works-- or at least should work. It's typically those of particular faiths that put up displays, so if a group of Whatchamacallums want their holiday displays, they can do it. The same holds true of the secular, who can legally tout their atheism.
Just as absurd as being offended by the presences of the word Christmas, don't you think?
You seem to think that they ALL want to be included....
It isn't an all or nothing.
It is an all who want to or nothing.
Is anyone actually offended by the word 'Christmas' though? I suspect if they are they are a little too precious.
Isn't it just as equally absurd to be offended over not being wished a Merry Christmas? To be offended over "Happy Holidays"? It is Christians who are throwing fits over this stuff. How many times do you see people getting upset because they weren't greeted with "Happy Chanukah" instead of "Happy Holidays"? Do you see Pagans in a tissy because they aren't hearing "Happy Yule"? No other religion is touting a "war" upon their holiday. Only Christians.I've only known two people that were offended by being wished a "Merry Christmas" but, I agree with you on the absurdity of being offended by it.
The concept of lighting a tree during this time of year actually has meaning to particular paths. Can you say what meaning it has to Christmas? It's awful convenient to co-opt the practices of other religions into your holiday when you are trying to convince people they need to convert. They even celebrate it on the wrong day entirely. Unless, that is, they want to admit it is actually more Earth religion driven in nature than their own particular mythology.It's called cultural syncreticism. What happened was that people in various cultures reinterpreted their practices when they became Christianized. It wasn't some nefarious thing. It was just a natural occurrence that happens all the time. No one owns a symbol. A tree is just a tree. What that tree means to you is subjective. Christians in Central and South America, or Christians across Africa, Asia and so on wouldn't celebrate Christmas with the same cultural traditions as we in the Anglosphere do. Why? Because they have their own cultures and traditions. Christianity is pretty handy in that it can be adapted to any culture.
I actually don't think all do want to be included. I think the misguided generic 'Happy Holidays' in order to not leave people out that may not even care if they're left out is stupid.
I also happen to think that anyone that would be offended by being wished a Merry Christmas or a Happy Hanukkah or a Happy Saturnalia just because they don't celebrate that particular holiday has issues.