Ok, this is just bizarre. I don't know why you creationists try to pull stuff like this when everything is simply a matter of record.
Post #330 is where you and I started in this thread. As we can see, that was where I asked you to back up your claim that you can "easily disprove evolutionary theory".
In
Post #333 you dodged, made more empty assertions, and challenged me to provide evidence.
In
Post #335 I pointed out your evasion and again asked you to "easily disprove evolutionary theory" as you'd claimed.
In
Post #336 you again dodged and claimed that we all knew your assertion was true.
In
Post #337 I again noted your dodging and again asked you to back up your claim.
In
Post #338 you bizarrely claimed you'd already done so, but didn't say where or what that disproof was.
In
Post #339 I asked where you had done what you claimed.
In
Post #340 you implied that I'd missed it (but still didn't say where or what this disproof was) and accused me of badgering you.
In
Post #344 I again noted your dodging and asked you to show where you'd disproven evolutionary theory.
In
Post #345 you claimed you'd already answered, but again didn't say where or what that answer was.
In
Post #347 I summed up your evasion.
In
Post #349 you linked back to your
Post #333 and asked what I understood it to be.
In
Post #351 I described #333 as a series of empty assertions and asked if that post constituted your disproof of evolutionary theory.
In
Post #353 you didn't answer and asked why I keep questioning you.
In
Post #355 I answered that I wanted you to stop acting like a guilty defendant on the stand, and just answer questions and back up your claim ("easily disproving evolutionary theory").
In
Post #356 you dodged again and accused me of distracting.
In
Post #357 I pointed out that you failed to back up your claims.
In
Post #359 you bizarrely asked how I would know if all I read were assumptions.
In
Post #360 I pointed to the record and noted that you had failed to back up your claim of being able to "easily disprove evolutionary theory" and also failed to back up your claim that you had already done so.
In
Post #361 you ended the exchange.
Then we began our discussion of transitional fossils, with me asking you over and over and over and over to simply give your definition of "transitional fossil" and you dodging every single time.
Shall we walk through that as well?
We all know why you dismiss it....you're a Jehovah's Witness.
How utterly bizarre.
You could clear this up very easily. All you have to do is show us how you can "easily disprove evolutionary theory" (or show where you did previously) and tell us what you think "transitional fossil" means.
You've made quite a series of claims about both, so how about backing them up?