• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The whole God and Evil thing with God.

Is God good?

  • Yes

    Votes: 16 59.3%
  • No

    Votes: 6 22.2%
  • Neither good nor evil

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • Unsure

    Votes: 1 3.7%

  • Total voters
    27

Lorgar-Aurelian

Active Member
Yet you base your OP on their incorrect hypotheses without subjecting them to rational consideration.

Good work.

2ndly. This is an argument addressed at those people, if you god doesn't fit into those categories then why are you upset? Simply produce an argument for your god so we can have a place to start. Or at very least describe some features of said god.
 

shmogie

Well-Known Member
Well that isn't exactly true. Believe me when I say I can separate the two.

wait wait where was the argument? I think I must of missed something. Can you quote it please?
It is called the open view of God, a theological concept that destroys your complaints about a God you don't believe in. I initiated a description of it, and got an arrogant smart assed answer from you, if you have read the Bible you know what I mean when I say I will cast no more pearls before swine. Continue your trolling without me, you are only motivated by your own ignorance,
 

Lorgar-Aurelian

Active Member
It is called the open view of God, a theological concept that destroys your complaints about a God you don't believe in. I initiated a description of it, and got an arrogant smart assed answer from you, if you have read the Bible you know what I mean when I say I will cast no more pearls before swine. Continue your trolling without me, you are only motivated by your own ignorance,
I don't think i'm trolling.. i'm also not sure what part you thought was smart assed. I mean the post after that one was kind of smart assed but that response wasn't really. I was also more concerned with the whole "God existing" bit. I mean I don't think the open view of god really destroys the idea that he isn't very nice now does it? he's still omnipotent isn't he?
 

neologist

Member
I still think it's interesting to note that a god of love is still such a dick. I kind of look at it like a work of fiction. . .
Heh.
You create a non existent hypothetical god. Then you rip it to shreds.
Then you admit it's fiction.
Well, I don't believe in that God either.
.
.
.
Happy?
 

Lorgar-Aurelian

Active Member
Heh.
You create a non existent hypothetical god. Then you rip it to shreds.
Then you admit it's fiction.
Well, I don't believe in that God either.
.
.
.
Happy?
Works for me. Then tell me about your God. If It is indeed superior to this concept I would love to hear it. I am not apposed to faith as a concept, just apposed to faith in gods I can't believe in.
 

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
You mean puppets?

Not necessarily.

Do you feel tempted to eat dog's excrements? Do you pray often to God because you feel so tempted to ingest them, while knowing that they are bad for you, that you need His help to resist? It looks so good, doesn't it? I am sure Satan is responsible for making it look so delicious.

If not, is that natural aversion towards dog's crap a sign that you are puppet-like for what concern your free choice to eat dog's crap or not? Do you need to think a lot when presented with the alternative of eating some Swiss chocolate instead?

Ciao

- viole

P.S. The "Swiss" qualifier for that chocolate is important, lol.
 
Last edited:

1robin

Christian/Baptist
Whenever I've tried to think about God as all loving or just a God guy/gal I find it rather difficult. The biggest problem with someone being omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent is that it makes it impossible for said being to escape blame for literally everything.

Any wrong doing was allowed by God to happen but not only that, it was more or less programed to happen. If God is the creator of man then he has more or less programed every negative aspect of ourselves into our heads. The inclination towards violence and tribalism? You can thank God for that. The sexual urges of pedophiles and rapists? You can thank God for that. Hatred? The list goes on and on.

The concept of sin is more or less God getting upset with you for things he set you up to do. It's a little ridiculous honestly. This is also part of the reason I was leaning towards pagan, at least with polytheism you don't have to constantly engage in apologetics for God's schizo behavior.

What do you think?
The existence of true love requires truly free will, the existence of truly free will requires the ability to use it incorrectly, the existence of the ability to disobey God entails the resultant existence or evil and suffering. Without God their exists no objective moral duties and values to obey or disobey. Without God all you have are subjective ethical preferences and opinions. Without God there is no good to be and no evil to avoid. With God all the suffering and evil suffered during life is redressed by eternal and perfect justice. Without God all the evil and good done by extremely finite biological anomalies which lack any objective value are all observed by a pitiless and indifferent universe which eventually ends in heat death for everyone and everything. Hitler and Billy Graham are rewarded equally without reference to merit or malevolence, by eternal nothingness. Without God you get at least the same level of evil, without any of the hope his existence provides. Quite a depressing picture without God.
 

Lorgar-Aurelian

Active Member
The existence of true love requires truly free will, the existence of truly free will requires the ability to use it incorrectly, the existence of the ability to disobey God entails the resultant existence or evil and suffering. Without God their exists no objective moral duties and values to obey or disobey. Without God all you have are subjective ethical preferences and opinions. Without God there is no good to be and no evil to avoid. With God all the suffering and evil suffered during life is redressed by eternal and perfect justice. Without God all the evil and good done by extremely finite biological anomalies which lack any objective value are all observed by a pitiless and indifferent universe which eventually ends in heat death for everyone and everything. Hitler and Billy Graham are rewarded equally without reference to merit or malevolence, by eternal nothingness. Without God you get at least the same level of evil, without any of the hope his existence provides. Quite a depressing picture without God.
I'm not sure if hope is enough of a reason to believe in god though.
 

dianaiad

Well-Known Member
Whenever I've tried to think about God as all loving or just a God guy/gal I find it rather difficult. The biggest problem with someone being omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent is that it makes it impossible for said being to escape blame for literally everything.

Any wrong doing was allowed by God to happen but not only that, it was more or less programed to happen. If God is the creator of man then he has more or less programed every negative aspect of ourselves into our heads. The inclination towards violence and tribalism? You can thank God for that. The sexual urges of pedophiles and rapists? You can thank God for that. Hatred? The list goes on and on.

The concept of sin is more or less God getting upset with you for things he set you up to do. It's a little ridiculous honestly. This is also part of the reason I was leaning towards pagan, at least with polytheism you don't have to constantly engage in apologetics for God's schizo behavior.

What do you think?


I think that this whole "problem of evil" thing is only a problem with those who have contradictory opinions about God's omniscience and omnipotence. They seem to believe that if God knows everything and can do anything, that He MUST know everything and MUST do everything; it's the Calvinistic puppet master being addressed.

However, what if 'omniscience' means 'knows everything that can be known" and omnipotence includes the ability to NOT do something?

After all, the whole problem of evil goes away if men can make their own choices without God stopping them from making stupid ones.

Set this scenario up: God created mankind and sends us all to be mortals on some planet so that we can learn what making one's own choices can result in; we can make 'em, and we have to deal with the consequences of them. However, because our lives are short and at the end we die and go back to Him, our choices HERE may not have eternal consequences (except perhaps to our own character development).

He isn't going to interfere much, if at all, with our choices, good, bad or indifferent. If some drunk gets in a car and mows down a toddler, God isn't going to stop that. He WILL, however, comfort the toddler who came home to Him early, and the drunk has to deal with the consequences.

What about natural disasters? You realize that 'natural disasters' are generally disasters only if humans end up getting killed or inconvenienced. There's a volcano out there right now which is erupting several times a day, I understand...and nobody is calling it a 'disaster,' because nobody is getting hurt, and we may end up with a new island. Everybody, however, is worried greatly about the extreme loss of life another Mt. Vesuvius eruption would cause. That would be a natural disaster.

We have evidence for a series of tsumamis having scoured the coast of Washington...and nobody is calling any of 'em 'natural disasters' unless that big wave took out a human village or two.

So what makes those things 'evil? ' They are just how the planet works. It is the choice of PEOPLE to live there. I live in earthquake country...about...oh...fifteen miles from the San Andreas fault. I've been in a few big ones. I imagine I'll be in a few more. The next one might shake my house down (probably not, but...) Whose fault would it be if it does? God's? HE did not make me live here. I chose to live here. I'd like to move, but considering that I'd like to move to a place where the Yellowstone super volcano would take me out instantly if it goes, one can hardly claim that I'm trading a bad decision for a good one. ;)

Nah. I think that if God is omnipotent, then He has the power to NOT do something, and since I believe He DID give us 'free agency," then the responsibility for evil here is also ours. Free will isn't free if we can only make good decisions.

I guess it's like the kid who stole his dad's car and runs it into a tree and complains that it's his dad's fault because Dad didn't hide the keys well enough.

Sorry....our choices, our consequences, our responsibility.
 

Lorgar-Aurelian

Active Member
I think that this whole "problem of evil" thing is only a problem with those who have contradictory opinions about God's omniscience and omnipotence. They seem to believe that if God knows everything and can do anything, that He MUST know everything and MUST do everything; it's the Calvinistic puppet master being addressed.

However, what if 'omniscience' means 'knows everything that can be known" and omnipotence includes the ability to NOT do something?

After all, the whole problem of evil goes away if men can make their own choices without God stopping them from making stupid ones.

Set this scenario up: God created mankind and sends us all to be mortals on some planet so that we can learn what making one's own choices can result in; we can make 'em, and we have to deal with the consequences of them. However, because our lives are short and at the end we die and go back to Him, our choices HERE may not have eternal consequences (except perhaps to our own character development).

He isn't going to interfere much, if at all, with our choices, good, bad or indifferent. If some drunk gets in a car and mows down a toddler, God isn't going to stop that. He WILL, however, comfort the toddler who came home to Him early, and the drunk has to deal with the consequences.

What about natural disasters? You realize that 'natural disasters' are generally disasters only if humans end up getting killed or inconvenienced. There's a volcano out there right now which is erupting several times a day, I understand...and nobody is calling it a 'disaster,' because nobody is getting hurt, and we may end up with a new island. Everybody, however, is worried greatly about the extreme loss of life another Mt. Vesuvius eruption would cause. That would be a natural disaster.

We have evidence for a series of tsumamis having scoured the coast of Washington...and nobody is calling any of 'em 'natural disasters' unless that big wave took out a human village or two.

So what makes those things 'evil? ' They are just how the planet works. It is the choice of PEOPLE to live there. I live in earthquake country...about...oh...fifteen miles from the San Andreas fault. I've been in a few big ones. I imagine I'll be in a few more. The next one might shake my house down (probably not, but...) Whose fault would it be if it does? God's? HE did not make me live here. I chose to live here. I'd like to move, but considering that I'd like to move to a place where the Yellowstone super volcano would take me out instantly if it goes, one can hardly claim that I'm trading a bad decision for a good one. ;)

Nah. I think that if God is omnipotent, then He has the power to NOT do something, and since I believe He DID give us 'free agency," then the responsibility for evil here is also ours. Free will isn't free if we can only make good decisions.

I guess it's like the kid who stole his dad's car and runs it into a tree and complains that it's his dad's fault because Dad didn't hide the keys well enough.

Sorry....our choices, our consequences, our responsibility.
I've heard this about 100 times now and it all seems to miss the point entirely. The question I ask now is " Is it even worth arguing about at this point?" Honestly I'm leaning towards no not really. Would it even be relevant if God was "evil" ? No not really because how exactly can you fight against that level of evil? It was a kind of interesting question to start but now I keep hearing the same thing over and over from both sides so you know..
 

Bird123

Well-Known Member
Well obviously this is more of an emotional argument to begin with. The rational argument is just that god straight up doesn't exist..


Should not whether God exists be explored as well? If one could put together the puzzle of how it all fits together, could that possibly lead to God or at least discovering how God really thinks??

Should one rely on the beliefs of whether God exists or not? One should always be open to all possibilities even the ones that one does not want to be true. That is the true path to discovering anything.
 

Lorgar-Aurelian

Active Member
Should not whether God exists be explored as well? If one could put together the puzzle of how it all fits together, could that possibly lead to God or at least discovering how God really thinks??

Should one rely on the beliefs of whether God exists or not? One should always be open to all possibilities even the ones that one does not want to be true. That is the true path to discovering anything.
What is your reason for believing or disbelieving in god then?
 

arthra

Baha'i
Whenever I've tried to think about God as all loving or just a God guy/gal I find it rather difficult. The biggest problem with someone being omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent is that it makes it impossible for said being to escape blame for literally everything.

Any wrong doing was allowed by God to happen but not only that, it was more or less programed to happen. If God is the creator of man then he has more or less programed every negative aspect of ourselves into our heads. The inclination towards violence and tribalism? You can thank God for that. The sexual urges of pedophiles and rapists? You can thank God for that. Hatred? The list goes on and on.

The concept of sin is more or less God getting upset with you for things he set you up to do. It's a little ridiculous honestly. This is also part of the reason I was leaning towards pagan, at least with polytheism you don't have to constantly engage in apologetics for God's schizo behavior.

What do you think?

Well in my view God has created a world in which we...humans are allowed choice... We choose and can make a mess .. We can learn from messes. Had God created a world where we were automatons and never made messes we wouldn't have souls or need thought...
 

fallingblood

Agnostic Theist
Whenever I've tried to think about God as all loving or just a God guy/gal I find it rather difficult. The biggest problem with someone being omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent is that it makes it impossible for said being to escape blame for literally everything.

Any wrong doing was allowed by God to happen but not only that, it was more or less programed to happen. If God is the creator of man then he has more or less programed every negative aspect of ourselves into our heads. The inclination towards violence and tribalism? You can thank God for that. The sexual urges of pedophiles and rapists? You can thank God for that. Hatred? The list goes on and on.

The concept of sin is more or less God getting upset with you for things he set you up to do. It's a little ridiculous honestly. This is also part of the reason I was leaning towards pagan, at least with polytheism you don't have to constantly engage in apologetics for God's schizo behavior.

What do you think?
The view you're mentioning here is the classical view of God. Its a view, that while still popular among laymen, within scholarship and theological teachings, died shortly after the Holocaust. The Holocaust changed a great deal, including how God was seen. Basically, the question came up, if God is all loving, and all powerful, how can evil exist, and in such a way that would allow the Holocaust.

What arises are different forms of theology, including process theology and liberation theology. The problem of evil, which from a theological stand point hasn't ever been fully answered, but some great ideas have been put forth, is dealt with in a few main points.

First, the main point that is brought up is a God who is self-limiting. While God may be all powerful, God has limited God's self in order to allow humans to be humans. That means that in times of suffering, God takes a step back. In theory, it would mean that God also suffers during that time, as a parent would, but God allows humans to be who they are.

That leads to a second point that humans, while created by God, are flawed. That flaw though allows for humans to be creative, to have freewill, and to chose. They contain chaos, which while can lead to evil or suffering, isn't a negative thing. From chaos comes order, and chaos allows people to be creative.
 
Top