dust1n
Zindīq
What's the difference?
Are you familiar with the difference between insults and assumptions?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What's the difference?
Well, that doesn't mean you should be a dick about it...
I've heard people refer to imperialism as a "cancer on the face of the earth"; does that mean an anti-imperialist with cancer would be offended by the expression?.
Are you familiar with the difference between insults and assumptions?
Are you familiar with the correlation between assumptions about one's surroundings and their interaction with them?
No. What is the correlation?
And I'm going to assume that was a yes, of sorts.
The correlation: Assumptions one make about their surroundings inherently affect their interactions with their surroundings.
Example: If someone is racist towards blacks, they will make and maintain an assumption that every black person they meet is inferior to them; as a result, their conduct regarding black people will be affected as a result.
Yes, everyone knows you are talking about it being okay to make fun of someone (who is not actually present, so the insult is being made to have fun at someone else's expense, NOT to really insult the supposed target) because they somehow resemble people who are disabled through no fault of their own, AS IF that person was a member of that group of disabled people. Ha ha. Very funny.Everyone knows what we're talking about.
Here's another example:
If someone lives on planet Earth, they will make and maintain an assumption that every morning the sun will rise. As a result, humans will alter their behavior due to that expectation.
Not so bad, those assumptions, after all, when taken into account they may result in reasonable outcomes and unreasonable outcomes.
"Mad" can be insulting to those with mental health issues.Meh, why can't people just call each other idiots or mad?
No need to offend others while your at it, just offend who you are targeting.
Well, we see eye to eye. Except I don't believe assuming someone is at fault, should be avoided/reprimanded or otherwise prejudiced against for using a word even when their intention is nowhere near as sinister as deliberately and expressly ridiculing someone for something they have no control over?
That's your perception. I would be careful about bestowing your impressions onto others.Because they use the term retarded as a synonym for something inferior or something that doesn't work properly.
In your opinion, perhaps not, but that's what this is all about: explaining why using a term for a developmental disorder to describe someone amounts to making fun of those who have the disorder.I don't think you should need an explanation why that is offensive.
Yes, everyone knows you are talking about it being okay to make fun of someone (who is not actually present, so the insult is being made to have fun at someone else's expense, NOT to really insult the supposed target) because they somehow resemble people who are disabled through no fault of their own, AS IF that person was a member of that group of disabled people. Ha ha. Very funny.
I'm sure you were never picked on when you were younger because you were younger, or goofier, or your skin was a different color, or your accent was different, or you had a speech impediment, or....And if you were, multiply that by a thousand for someone who is obviously different than "normal" people and get insulted and victimized and put down all the time for things they can do nothing about.
Words are weapons, and using them in a manner that harms, whether "intended" or not, causes harm. Maybe not to you, and maybe you can't fathom why someone with dark skin might resent the N word, or a person of Irish descent might take exception to being called a Mic, and so on. It shows you are an ignorant, inconsiderate @$$ of a human being. WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT is human beings with feelings, and treating them like inanimate objects for a laugh, or to harm them mentally, emotionally, socially. Go ahead, pile it on them, they're too weak to fight back about it!
Yep! That's what I'm talking about.
Well what pretty words do you want ?.OK, I'm disabled (not in the sense of "retarded") and I hate the word "handicapped". It comes across as ridiculously patronizing. People in disabled communities generally say "disabled".
Case Study: A principal lawyer asks one of his paralegals to look for an appropriate barrister to act in a matter and the paralegal suggests one. The principal, as the work load is enormous, says no on the basis that he would be "a retarded choice" or that "[the barrister in question] is a retard".
Now, these two colleagues might have a mutual understanding of what is meant when they refer to someone in the industry as a retard and, by using a two syllable word instead of explaining why this barrister would be an inappropriate choice, time is saved.
Where in this case study is an example of someone who is reflecting their unhappiness and where is the example of putting others down to make themselves feel better?
a distant relative of mine is mongoloid.Admittedly, this is a topic that I might be lacking in understanding so I appreciate any assistance.
The other day, I was watching a game at a bar and one of the players on screen made a huge mistake. One guy I was watching the game with shook his head and said, "that'd be right - the retard we all knew him to be". Immediately when this guy said "retard," another guy turned around to him, noticeably offended, and confronted him about his use of the word. The offended guy's complaint was based upon the fact that he "works with special needs children" and that he is always offended when he hears that word being used. The guy apologised and said to offended guy that he never intended to use the word to offend anyone.
Now, I have an enormous respect for language and love flexible use of the English language so this altercation left me puzzled. After briefly looking at the etymology and considering the past and present uses of the word, I'm still at a loss about this offended guy's reaction.
First off - apparently this was a term that was widely accepted with medical connotations and used as a means to refer to people with mental disabilities as an alternative to being called things like "idiot" or "moron". This was apparently up until the last 15 years when people started deciding that "retard" should be considered an insult. Secondly, the word is used so liberally today to refer to so many different things in literally infinite contexts that to avoid the word would probably only cripple expression.
Considering the above paragraph, it's obvious to me that there needs to be a term that distinguishes people with intellectual disabilities for everyone's benefit however it seems as if the very nature of the topic would doom any term that refers to intellectually challenged people to eventually become a term of insult. This almost confirms to me that simply being offended by something does not constitute any form of argument and by assuming that it does stifles progress.
Idk, it's a dirty topic I suppose - but necessary.