Magic Man
Reaper of Conversation
There is such a thing as responding to a threat with an unjustified amount of force. For instance, you're not allowed shoot someone because he slaps you in the face. How about he tells GZ that he better stay down and then RUNS to a safe location. He clearly would've had the opportunity once he had dropped GZ. And if George is the coward we all think he is there's about 99% chance he would heeded such a warning to stay down. Even from a moral point of view, the kid should've at least given George a chance to give up. Raining blows on him mma style until he's in a comma or dies cannot be justified on the grounds that there's chance he MIGHT get up again. And what's so wild about assuming that George had been dropped from a punch and then Martin climbed on him MMA style basically trying to kill him? GZ certainly lie down voluntarily. Or do you propose Trayvon simply asked him to lie down and George complied with the request? Is anyone even arguing against the claim that GZ was dropped by Martin at which point an MMA style beatdown commenced? Even the prosecution, a sad excuse for a bunch of litigators, had to change their tune and concede that Martin was on top when he was shot.
Let's break down these assumptions you're making:
1) Martin used more force than was necessary (like shooting someone for slapping you in the face). We have no idea. When a kid is being followed by a man at night and is then confronted, he's justifiably not thinking "Exactly how much force is necessary to just make sure I'm safe but no more". He's justifiably thinking "Crap, I need to protect myself; I don't know who this is or what he's capable of".
2) "How about he tells GZ that he better stay down and then RUNS to a safe location. He clearly would've had the opportunity once he had dropped GZ. And if George is the coward we all think he is there's about 99% chance he would heeded such a warning to stay down."
First, we have no idea how the altercation went. We don't know that he just dropped Zimmerman and then had the chance to run. And telling a complete stranger who has been threatening you to stay down while you run away might sound great in hindsight when the whole situation can be looked at, but that's not how it works when you're in the situation. This is the main problem with all of your assumptions: you're looking at it with a whole lot more info than Martin would have had at the time, and you're looking at it less emotionally and more rationally than someone who's being threatened and is trying to protect themselves.
3) "Even from a moral point of view, the kid should've at least given George a chance to give up. Raining blows on him mma style until he's in a comma or dies cannot be justified on the grounds that there's chance he MIGHT get up again. And what's so wild about assuming that George had been dropped from a punch and then Martin climbed on him MMA style basically trying to kill him? GZ certainly lie down voluntarily. Or do you propose Trayvon simply asked him to lie down and George complied with the request? Is anyone even arguing against the claim that GZ was dropped by Martin at which point an MMA style beatdown commenced?"
Yes, people are arguing against the wild assumption that an MMA style beatdown commenced. It's a given that Martin was on top of Zimmerman, but there isn't sufficient evidence for your assumption that he was raining blows on him or that it was MMA style or that he was trying to put him in a coma or kill him. You're welcome to assume all of that, but you need to realize it's just an assumption, not close to a fact.
The bottom line is you have this idea of how it went that isn't proven by what we know. It's possible things went the way you think they did, but don't act like it's fact.