Grumpuss
Active Member
Supported by historical account, right?Huh??
"reform", you mean? The Renaissance was a period of European history.They haven't gone through the process of the Renaissance and are still under the thrall of religious extremism.
I'm not sure what this suggestion means. Are you advocating democracy or a central global government?Should any country?
I had been. But you present zero actual alternative evidence of Exodus not existing, preferring to savage the primary account. You don't seem to cite much of a basis for rejection because of the supernatural claims of the Bible, ignore that the Hebrews were continually harassed, attacked, enslaved and discriminated against, to parrot what is essentially a white supremacist claim that the Exodus is made up.Enough. I don't have animosity to the Jews. While you seem to think that a historical critique is the same as a denigration, that is simply not the case.
Judaism is no worse than any other religion and is better than most. I have far, far more problems with fundamentalist Christianity, but any sort of fundamentalism (which tends to deny the humanity of those who disagree) is problematic.
Now, if you want to discuss the historicity of the Exodus and Biblical texts, we can continue.
But if you are going to continue to insult me, this discussion is over.