BilliardsBall
Veteran Member
I have been answering that in the previous posts. Firstly, from the perspective of experience. Experience illuminates everything. Without experience, all we have is speculations and suppositions based upon concepts and ideas, which is a matter of the head trying to figure out something it has no experience with. That of course, in all cases, in all matters, religious or otherwise, ends up typically quite far off the mark.
As an illustration of that, I always like to share that cartoon someone came up with that to me spot-on nails that difference. I believe I may have shared this with you before, but I'll share it again here to illustrate my first point in how we are able to discern meaning from scripture:
View attachment 45981
The second way we can know, if we lack personal experience with something, is with reason and logic. Though not as illuminating as experience, it certainly does give us clues or point us in the right direction of understanding.
I've given several examples in the previous post how hell is not something that can be reconciled logically with a God of Infinite Love. If we are to read those passages as, literal facts and not metaphoric language to point to some abstraction beyond a literal interpretation, we are confronted with irreconcilable contradictions.
"Weeping and gnashing of teeth", if understood literally, means the resurrected dead have teeth and eyes that water. Does that make logical sense to you? Why would they have teeth? Teeth are for chewing food in order to fill our stomachs with what we need in order to continue to live. In a place like hell where no one ever dies, why teeth? Why eyes that secrete fluid?
Compare that now with how Jesus answered that misguided, literalist imagination of the afterlife by the person who asked him about the wife of the brothers who died in succession while she was alive. "Whose wife is she in the afterlife," they naively asked him. Jesus' answer is telling, and directly addresses my pointing out the absurdity of teeth in hell. "They neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of heaven".
That means, they don't have sex organs! What purpose would they serve? Likewise what purpose would teeth serve in hell? It's not logical. Jesus was saying, "Don't be a literalist!," to those who imagined they would be marrying and having sex in heaven. Don't think like that. Don't think literally, he was saying in essence to them.
The other example of a logical impossibility I gave was that existence of hell as a place. Where is it located? None of your answers can be reconciled with an infinite God of infinite Love. If hell is inside God, then God is in hell. If hell is outside God, then God is not infinite. There can be no "outside" of infinity. Infinity has no outsides, no boundaries. That is not logical.
So, firstly is experience, and secondly without experience to illuminate, logic. Hell as a literal place of torture, fits neither experience nor logic. Hell as a metaphor for suffering, fits both.
I hope this helps.
God is in Hell, as you quoted the scripture--there's no place we can go that God is not.
Hell is logical, we would praise Jesus if we saw Hitler in Heaven, knowing God's mercy, but also praise Him if we saw Hitler in Hell, knowing God's justice. What a person sows, they reap.
Hell in the Bible is down, Heaven is up--that is, God's Heaven is outside the visible universe, Hell is in the Earth's interior, known to be a source of heat and a place of many subterranean chambers.
I liked your cartoon very much, but Jesus didn't use love to interpret/reinterpret the scriptures as much as He was the author of the scriptures and made them sensible to lay people and Pharisees alike.