First Baseman
Retired athlete
In order to do so one would have to actually read and study the Quran. I have no intention whatsoever of doing so.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
There are no mistakes in Quran
- Thread starter paarsurrey
- Start date
In order to do so one would have to actually read and study the Quran. I have no intention whatsoever of doing so.
firedragon
Veteran Member
I think thats an awesome and truthful statement. I cant help chuckling to this and have come back to read this small statement a few times, I mean it respectfully.
Shad
Veteran Member
No the word is moosioona as la is prefix. Waasia is wide hence the verse is widener, extender not expander.
No I am going on the "all" parameters. If all living things are created in pairs while there are organism that require no pairs then the verse is merely 7th century knowledge
No but that in every case of the use "found" in the Quran is also an actuality. The verse does say it was setting in the pool http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=18&verse=86 Everything in brackets is commentary not in the verse
Thrown is irrelevant in itself as something thrown becomes a missile. The problem is that this verse is taking meteor showers, falling restorers, etc as if these we actual stars with a purpose.
Post hoc rationalization. You also ignore what Jinns are in order to change it to debris. Jinn are debris now?
Which is your view after all Islam has doctrine for jinn and black magic.
Which shows that this 7th century Arab didn't have a clue what he was talking about
Your way has flaws and discounts the other method completely in favour of your religion.
Mountains do not stabilize anything otherwise. Mountains are tiny compared to plates and has no effect on it's movement as something that hinders earthquakes or the plates.. Also if you look at records of earthquakes you will find that major earthquakes often occur in areas with a massive amount of mountains yet this did nothing to stabilizes anything.
Seems like you have zero known of plate tectonics
Shad
Veteran Member
So you cherry pick even your own sects views when convenient.
Aquitaine
Well-Known Member
We have (just like with every other thread of this topic) but whenever one is brought up the muslims dismiss it as misinterpretated, or twist the verse to mean something else.
What truly hasn't been seen yet is any of these apparent "scientific miracles".
morphesium
Active Member
Actually, a lot of mistakes in koran has been pointed out and it is there in the site wikiislam. you can go and read some verses in koran and you will know how pathetic it is morally and scientifically.
Last edited:
firedragon
Veteran Member
They are not mistakes that has been pointed out. They are things found in anti Islam sites. They are not mistakes but simply an opinion that they hold fast to.
morphesium
Active Member
Didn't this post (just a few posts up ) make any sense to you? shame on you.
http://www.religiousforums.com/threads/there-are-no-mistakes-in-quran.180191/page-24#post-4688277
Even if someone points a mistake, and you know there are plenty of mistakes in koran, - in the very next thread you would still be typing sentences like these- "there are no mistakes in quran" or "so far no one has pointed out a single mistake in quran".
firedragon
Veteran Member
Please answer these questions if you dont mind.
What does la mean?
So you very clearly say that 'Waasia' cannot by any means mean expand. But it means Extender and Expander?
And you quote Corpus.Quran, what reference do you quote for this to contradict Corpus.Quran for this point?
You said that it was past tense. Whats your assessment with la as prefix moosioona being the word, coming from Waasia as you have pointed out. Is that still in the past tense?
Made in pairs. That does not say that "Children are made only via sexual intercourse between a male and a female". Whereever you picked this up from. There are organisms that do not need pairs to reproduce, but show me an organism that are not MADE IN PAIRS>.
It does not say the Sun sets in water. It says that he reached the Sunset, then he reached the Sunrise a couple of verses later. Have you heard of the evening prayer that Muslims generally refer to? Maghrib. This is the same. l Maghribi is the west.
You have to understand the point.
Thats a premitive interpretation.
For this, you wanted to give the interpretation you really wanted to.
I already said "If you analyse, this is talking of lower skys that repel whats astray (lishshayatheena). It could very well be talking about the ozone layer that burns astray debris that enters the earths atmosphere. That could be the punishment of the Blaze cited here."
SHOW ME THAT IT SAYS JINN.
When you translate something with a paganised, magic, big devils, little devils, hoodoo, woodoo, curses, Hercules, Zues, Karuppayya, etc in your mind you will look for it those things.If you are scientific in your mind you will look for that. So you can argue both ways. It depends on you, if its just a sentence. But the Quran tells me not to walk blindly, and to analyse every piece of information I get.
Your perceptions. And you dont intend to understand.
When you say that major earthquakes often occur in areas with mountains, please realise that earch quakes happen elswhere as well.
It is not about earth quakes. I know that people who cant stand or hate the Quran look for what ever they can find, like this earth quake argument which is completely irrelevant.
When two plates collide, mountains are formed. The stronger plate slides under the other. Mountain ranges, the crust sinks deeper into the mantle. Read General Science - 1985, and isostasy.
Transform, extensional, and compressional environments produce different types of earthquakes. Thus it could happen anywhere. Nevertheless it is a fact that plates drift over the magma stratum. The mountains formed in the conjunctions prevent drifting. Areas that are tectonically stable tend to be isostatically balanced.
Peace.
Last edited:
firedragon
Veteran Member
No it did not.
Shad
Veteran Member
It can mean extend. However expander only came later. This was not how the verse was translated prior to the development of the expanding universe model. Later translations using expander in order for the verse to confirm to modern knowledge
It is based on Lane's Lexicon pages 3052 and 3053.
Irrelevant as http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=51&verse=47#(51:47:1) shows it is past tense, built is past tense.
No, what it does say in all things made in pairs. The parameter of all destroys this miracle. Asexual organisms do not require a mate such as prokaryotic.
http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=36&verse=36
http://www.britannica.com/science/binary-fission
Yes it does since every example of the use "found" was an actuality not the appearance of. Maghribi is not west.
http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=18&verse=86
Your point has no merit
No it isn't as people didn't know what falling stars were.
Nope.
Which is post hoc rationalization as their is nothing about the ozone at all. The ozone isn't a missile. It doesn't make debris missiles
The next verse identifies Satan who is a Jinn as does another verse. Neither verse diverges from the stars being the object in question.
http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=37&verse=7
http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=67&verse=5#(67:5:1)
Empty assumption.
If you mean convinced by your horrible argument, ignoring what the text saws, ignore lexicons, then sure I agree. I do not have your confirmation bias and low standards
Yes but the point is if mountains stabilize anything then said mountains would reduce the amount of earthquakes in a region. However these regions have a greater amount of earthquakes then region without mountains at all such as prairies plains.
Wrong as the claim is earthquake stabilize the earth but in fact do no such thing. Your point is irrelevant.
Yet these sliding plate are not stabilized the the mountains they create. The mountains have no effect on the plates not even hindering movement as the mountains are part of the plate itself. You quote does nothing to support your claim at all.
Irrelevant as per the claim mountains should make these areas more stable when this never actually happens. The mountains do not provide this balance and you have done nothing to show any mountain does. Congratulation on your inability to read your own sources. You are making things up not stated by your source. The rocky mountains has done nothing to prevent the Pacific plate from hitting the North American plate nor continuing to do so.
firedragon
Veteran Member
A word not translated as such sometime ago does not mean it cannot mean expand now. You cannot say it cannot mean that. Thats absurd. It can mean expand and it does. Check your own source.
Check the same link you provide. It says expand. Earlier you said it does not and you provide a source that contradicts you.
And you said Lamoosioona is not the word, La is the prefix. Of course. But what does La mean?
And your source says Expanders. Is that past tense? I already told you, its an active participle. I even gave you examples. Check your own source.
http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=36&verse=36#(36:36:1)
Created in pairs, not created by pairs. Where ever you picked up that argument from is false. Check your own source.
Mountains stabilise plates. It does not reduce earthquakes. No one said it. But if you wanna deny something, deny that mountains stabilise plates.
Well, if you would like to stick to an unscientific claim, so be it. But maybe you could study what isostasy and isostasy equilibrium is.
firedragon
Veteran Member
Show me where it says Jinn.
Worth noting that while many examples raised do make the Qur'an seem entirely like a fallible text to non-Muslims, a Muslim is very much committed to not thinking of them as mistakes. A non-Muslim might say this is blind faith or denial or whatever, a Muslim might say it's because they don't reject the true meaning while the non-Muslims do because they're turning away from the Qur'an, because of pride or prior indoctrination or whatever.
Either way, examples and proofs can be thrown all one likes, it seems hugely unlikely a Muslim will concede 'Oh yes, that is a mistake, thanks random Internet-person I'll change my entire religious worldview' or that a non-Muslim will suddenly say 'You know what, you're right, it is totally infallible and comes from God, where can I go to say Shahadah?'
Either way, examples and proofs can be thrown all one likes, it seems hugely unlikely a Muslim will concede 'Oh yes, that is a mistake, thanks random Internet-person I'll change my entire religious worldview' or that a non-Muslim will suddenly say 'You know what, you're right, it is totally infallible and comes from God, where can I go to say Shahadah?'
firedragon
Veteran Member
Its not about Shahadah. Its about understanding. There is no need for one to call himself Muslim. There are a lot of people who call themselves by various terms who go and commit murder, rape and corruption. If one man who calls himself a Christian murders 6 million Jews, is he still a Christian? Thats a big question. Those ISIS dudes who call themselves Muslims, are they Muslim? Thus increasing the number is just absurd.
But we can take an effort to understand a book and discuss the topic. There always some knowledge to take from it.
If an example is taken. Lets say from the Vedas.
I have heard many people say that the Vedas say that the earth is static and they quote Yajurved. Then a guy called Mahasrirajan explained that this manthra does not say static, it says stable. Now the thing is, I am a Muslim, I certainly dont believe the Vedas to be infallible because I have studied it in depth. But I must take his explanation because its true. He is correct. Yajurved 32/6.
But there are some that no one can explain in any manner of translation or morality.
Fair enough
I do respect you've actually heard of the Vedas, let alone know some stuff about them!
Although the term infallible as used for the Qur'an and by some Christians for the Bible is not quite the same as the term used for the Vedas. The Vedas are shruti, 'heard', which is to say they are the transcription of the divine understandings of the rishis, who were saints, mystics and philosophers of the 2nd Millennium BCE. They built upon pre-existing customs and terminology, and include a whole mixed bag of stuff really.
Nevertheless, for me 'Jews believe Ezra is the Son of God' does it. For you, it does not. That is as it is.
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Let me clear one point again and I request everybody to remember it:
There are no mistakes in Quran
Post#1
It is due to wrong understanding of Quran, much propagated by the opposing websites.
If one studies Quran oneself:
It is due to wrong understanding of Quran, much propagated by the opposing websites.
If one studies Quran oneself:
- intently
- unbiased
- with an open mind
- and with correct approach
It is therefore essential that one confirms that one has read the Quran from cover to cover and while reading it one naturally noticed a mistake in Quran. All such observations will be attended by me.
If one "copies/pastes" from other websites who oppose Islam, I don't feel like attending them as such posts are just for the sake of fun.
There are other websites who have written replies to them one may like to access them.
Regards
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
I did not claim that Quran is a text book of science. One may check it when one is free.
Quran is for guidance of the humans toward the path that leads to G-d. It guides one in ethical, moral and spiritual matters.
What to speak of the living things, even the non-animate things have been described by science in pairs/family terms.
#442"Family Of The Sun" - The Planets of Our Solar System in Song
However, I will discuss the word (ز و ج) plural أَزْوَاجٌ translated in some relevant verses as "pairs" mentioned in Quran:#442"Family Of The Sun" - The Planets of Our Solar System in Song
The triliteral root zāy wāw jīm (ز و ج) occurs 81 times in the Quran, in two derived forms:
- five times as the form II verb zuwwijat (زُوِّجَتْ)
- 76 times as the noun zawj (زَوْج)
Verb (form II) - to marry, to be paired
(33:37:31) zawwajnākahā We married her to you فَلَمَّا قَضَىٰ زَيْدٌ مِنْهَا وَطَرًا زَوَّجْنَاكَهَا
(42:50:2) yuzawwijuhum He grants them أَوْ يُزَوِّجُهُمْ ذُكْرَانًا وَإِنَاثًا وَيَجْعَلُ مَنْ يَشَاءُ عَقِيمًا
(44:54:2) wazawwajnāhum And We will marry them كَذَٰلِكَ وَزَوَّجْنَاهُمْ بِحُورٍ عِينٍ
(52:20:5) wazawwajnāhum and We will marry them مُتَّكِئِينَ عَلَىٰ سُرُرٍ مَصْفُوفَةٍ وَزَوَّجْنَاهُمْ بِحُورٍ عِينٍ
(81:7:3) zuwwijat are paired وَإِذَا النُّفُوسُ زُوِّجَتْ
Noun
(2:25:30) azwājun spouses وَلَهُمْ فِيهَا أَزْوَاجٌ مُطَهَّرَةٌ وَهُمْ فِيهَا خَالِدُونَ
(2:35:5) wazawjuka and your spouse وَقُلْنَا يَا آدَمُ اسْكُنْ أَنْتَ وَزَوْجُكَ الْجَنَّةَ وَكُلَا مِنْهَا رَغَدًا
(2:102:42) wazawjihi and his spouse فَيَتَعَلَّمُونَ مِنْهُمَا مَا يُفَرِّقُونَ بِهِ بَيْنَ الْمَرْءِ وَزَوْجِهِ
(2:230:10) zawjan a spouse فَإِنْ طَلَّقَهَا فَلَا تَحِلُّ لَهُ مِنْ بَعْدُ حَتَّىٰ تَنْكِحَ زَوْجًا غَيْرَهُ
(2:232:10) azwājahunna their husbands فَلَا تَعْضُلُوهُنَّ أَنْ يَنْكِحْنَ أَزْوَاجَهُنَّ إِذَا تَرَاضَوْا بَيْنَهُمْ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ
(2:234:5) azwājan wives وَالَّذِينَ يُتَوَفَّوْنَ مِنْكُمْ وَيَذَرُونَ أَزْوَاجًا يَتَرَبَّصْنَ بِأَنْفُسِهِنَّ أَرْبَعَةَ أَشْهُرٍ وَعَشْرًا
(2:240:5) azwājan (their) wives وَالَّذِينَ يُتَوَفَّوْنَ مِنْكُمْ وَيَذَرُونَ أَزْوَاجًا وَصِيَّةً لِأَزْوَاجِهِمْ
(2:240:7) li-azwājihim for their wives وَصِيَّةً لِأَزْوَاجِهِمْ مَتَاعًا إِلَى الْحَوْلِ غَيْرَ إِخْرَاجٍ
(3:15:17) wa-azwājun and spouses وَأَزْوَاجٌ مُطَهَّرَةٌ وَرِضْوَانٌ مِنَ اللَّهِ وَاللَّهُ بَصِيرٌ بِالْعِبَادِ
(4:1:12) zawjahā its mate يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ اتَّقُوا رَبَّكُمُ الَّذِي خَلَقَكُمْ مِنْ نَفْسٍ وَاحِدَةٍ وَخَلَقَ مِنْهَا زَوْجَهَا
(4:12:5) azwājukum by your wives وَلَكُمْ نِصْفُ مَا تَرَكَ أَزْوَاجُكُمْ إِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ لَهُنَّ وَلَدٌ
(4:20:4) zawjin a wife وَإِنْ أَرَدْتُمُ اسْتِبْدَالَ زَوْجٍ
(4:20:6) zawjin (of) a wife مَكَانَ زَوْجٍ وَآتَيْتُمْ إِحْدَاهُنَّ قِنْطَارًا فَلَا تَأْخُذُوا مِنْهُ شَيْئًا
(4:57:16) azwājun (are) spouses لَهُمْ فِيهَا أَزْوَاجٌ مُطَهَّرَةٌ وَنُدْخِلُهُمْ ظِلًّا ظَلِيلًا
(6:139:11) azwājinā our spouses خَالِصَةٌ لِذُكُورِنَا وَمُحَرَّمٌ عَلَىٰ أَزْوَاجِنَا
(6:143:2) azwājin pairs ثَمَانِيَةَ أَزْوَاجٍ مِنَ الضَّأْنِ اثْنَيْنِ وَمِنَ الْمَعْزِ اثْنَيْنِ
(7:19:4) wazawjuka and your wife وَيَا آدَمُ اسْكُنْ أَنْتَ وَزَوْجُكَ الْجَنَّةَ فَكُلَا مِنْ حَيْثُ شِئْتُمَا
(7:189:9) zawjahā its mate هُوَ الَّذِي خَلَقَكُمْ مِنْ نَفْسٍ وَاحِدَةٍ وَجَعَلَ مِنْهَا زَوْجَهَا
(9:24:7) wa-azwājukum and your spouses وَأَزْوَاجُكُمْ وَعَشِيرَتُكُمْ وَأَمْوَالٌ اقْتَرَفْتُمُوهَا
(11:40:12) zawjayni a pair قُلْنَا احْمِلْ فِيهَا مِنْ كُلٍّ زَوْجَيْنِ اثْنَيْنِ
(13:3:14) zawjayni pairs وَمِنْ كُلِّ الثَّمَرَاتِ جَعَلَ فِيهَا زَوْجَيْنِ اثْنَيْنِ
(13:23:8) wa-azwājihim and their spouses جَنَّاتُ عَدْنٍ يَدْخُلُونَهَا وَمَنْ صَلَحَ مِنْ آبَائِهِمْ وَأَزْوَاجِهِمْ
(13:38:8) azwājan wives وَلَقَدْ أَرْسَلْنَا رُسُلًا مِنْ قَبْلِكَ وَجَعَلْنَا لَهُمْ أَزْوَاجًا وَذُرِّيَّةً
(15:88:8) azwājan (to) categories لَا تَمُدَّنَّ عَيْنَيْكَ إِلَىٰ مَا مَتَّعْنَا بِهِ أَزْوَاجًا مِنْهُمْ
(16:72:6) azwājan spouses وَاللَّهُ جَعَلَ لَكُمْ مِنْ أَنْفُسِكُمْ أَزْوَاجًا
(16:72:10) azwājikum your spouses وَجَعَلَ لَكُمْ مِنْ أَزْوَاجِكُمْ بَنِينَ وَحَفَدَةً
(20:53:16) azwājan pairs وَأَنْزَلَ مِنَ السَّمَاءِ مَاءً فَأَخْرَجْنَا بِهِ أَزْوَاجًا مِنْ نَبَاتٍ شَتَّىٰ
(20:117:7) walizawjika and to your wife فَقُلْنَا يَا آدَمُ إِنَّ هَٰذَا عَدُوٌّ لَكَ وَلِزَوْجِكَ
(20:131:8) azwājan pairs وَلَا تَمُدَّنَّ عَيْنَيْكَ إِلَىٰ مَا مَتَّعْنَا بِهِ أَزْوَاجًا مِنْهُمْ زَهْرَةَ الْحَيَاةِ الدُّنْيَا
(21:90:8) zawjahu his wife فَاسْتَجَبْنَا لَهُ وَوَهَبْنَا لَهُ يَحْيَىٰ وَأَصْلَحْنَا لَهُ زَوْجَهُ
(22:5:68) zawjin kind اهْتَزَّتْ وَرَبَتْ وَأَنْبَتَتْ مِنْ كُلِّ زَوْجٍ بَهِيجٍ
(23:6:3) azwājihim their spouses إِلَّا عَلَىٰ أَزْوَاجِهِمْ أَوْ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُهُمْ فَإِنَّهُمْ غَيْرُ مَلُومِينَ
(23:27:17) zawjayni (of) mates فَإِذَا جَاءَ أَمْرُنَا وَفَارَ التَّنُّورُ فَاسْلُكْ فِيهَا مِنْ كُلٍّ زَوْجَيْنِ اثْنَيْنِ
(24:6:3) azwājahum their spouses وَالَّذِينَ يَرْمُونَ أَزْوَاجَهُمْ وَلَمْ يَكُنْ لَهُمْ شُهَدَاءُ إِلَّا أَنْفُسُهُمْ فَشَهَادَةُ أَحَدِهِمْ أَرْبَعُ شَهَادَاتٍ بِاللَّهِ إِنَّهُ لَمِنَ الصَّادِقِينَ
(25:74:7) azwājinā our spouses هَبْ لَنَا مِنْ أَزْوَاجِنَا وَذُرِّيَّاتِنَا قُرَّةَ أَعْيُنٍ
(26:7:10) zawjin kind أَوَلَمْ يَرَوْا إِلَى الْأَرْضِ كَمْ أَنْبَتْنَا فِيهَا مِنْ كُلِّ زَوْجٍ كَرِيمٍ
(26:166:7) azwājikum your mates وَتَذَرُونَ مَا خَلَقَ لَكُمْ رَبُّكُمْ مِنْ أَزْوَاجِكُمْ
(30:21:8) azwājan mates وَمِنْ آيَاتِهِ أَنْ خَلَقَ لَكُمْ مِنْ أَنْفُسِكُمْ أَزْوَاجًا لِتَسْكُنُوا إِلَيْهَا
(31:10:26) zawjin kind وَأَنْزَلْنَا مِنَ السَّمَاءِ مَاءً فَأَنْبَتْنَا فِيهَا مِنْ كُلِّ زَوْجٍ كَرِيمٍ
(33:4:11) azwājakumu your wives وَمَا جَعَلَ أَزْوَاجَكُمُ اللَّائِي تُظَاهِرُونَ مِنْهُنَّ أُمَّهَاتِكُمْ
(33:6:6) wa-azwājuhu and his wives النَّبِيُّ أَوْلَىٰ بِالْمُؤْمِنِينَ مِنْ أَنْفُسِهِمْ وَأَزْوَاجُهُ أُمَّهَاتُهُمْ
(33:28:4) li-azwājika to your wives يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُلْ لِأَزْوَاجِكَ إِنْ كُنْتُنَّ تُرِدْنَ الْحَيَاةَ الدُّنْيَا وَزِينَتَهَا فَتَعَالَيْنَ أُمَتِّعْكُنَّ
(33:37:11) zawjaka your wife أَمْسِكْ عَلَيْكَ زَوْجَكَ وَاتَّقِ اللَّهَ
(33:37:39) azwāji the wives لِكَيْ لَا يَكُونَ عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ حَرَجٌ فِي أَزْوَاجِ أَدْعِيَائِهِمْ
(33:50:6) azwājaka your wives يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ إِنَّا أَحْلَلْنَا لَكَ أَزْوَاجَكَ اللَّاتِي آتَيْتَ أُجُورَهُنَّ
(33:50:50) azwājihim their wives قَدْ عَلِمْنَا مَا فَرَضْنَا عَلَيْهِمْ فِي أَزْوَاجِهِمْ
(33:52:12) azwājin (other) wives لَا يَحِلُّ لَكَ النِّسَاءُ مِنْ بَعْدُ وَلَا أَنْ تَبَدَّلَ بِهِنَّ مِنْ أَزْوَاجٍ
Continued in the next post #479.
Regards
Last edited:
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Continued from the previous post #478.
(33:53:60) azwājahu his wives وَلَا أَنْ تَنْكِحُوا أَزْوَاجَهُ مِنْ بَعْدِهِ أَبَدًا
(33:59:4) li-azwājika to your wives يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُلْ لِأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِنْ جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ
(35:11:10) azwājan pairs وَاللَّهُ خَلَقَكُمْ مِنْ تُرَابٍ ثُمَّ مِنْ نُطْفَةٍ ثُمَّ جَعَلَكُمْ أَزْوَاجًا
(36:36:4) l-azwāja (in) pairs سُبْحَانَ الَّذِي خَلَقَ الْأَزْوَاجَ كُلَّهَا مِمَّا تُنْبِتُ الْأَرْضُ
(36:56:2) wa-azwājuhum and their spouses هُمْ وَأَزْوَاجُهُمْ فِي ظِلَالٍ عَلَى الْأَرَائِكِ مُتَّكِئُونَ
(37:22:4) wa-azwājahum and their kinds احْشُرُوا الَّذِينَ ظَلَمُوا وَأَزْوَاجَهُمْ وَمَا كَانُوا يَعْبُدُونَ
(38:58:4) azwājun (of various) kinds وَآخَرُ مِنْ شَكْلِهِ أَزْوَاجٌ
(39:6:8) zawjahā its mate خَلَقَكُمْ مِنْ نَفْسٍ وَاحِدَةٍ ثُمَّ جَعَلَ مِنْهَا زَوْجَهَا
(39:6:14) azwājin kinds ثُمَّ جَعَلَ مِنْهَا زَوْجَهَا وَأَنْزَلَ لَكُمْ مِنَ الْأَنْعَامِ ثَمَانِيَةَ أَزْوَاجٍ
(40:8:11) wa-azwājihim and their spouses وَمَنْ صَلَحَ مِنْ آبَائِهِمْ وَأَزْوَاجِهِمْ وَذُرِّيَّاتِهِمْ
(42:11:8) azwājan mates فَاطِرُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ جَعَلَ لَكُمْ مِنْ أَنْفُسِكُمْ أَزْوَاجًا
(42:11:11) azwājan mates وَمِنَ الْأَنْعَامِ أَزْوَاجًا يَذْرَؤُكُمْ فِيهِ لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ
(43:12:3) l-azwāja the pairs وَالَّذِي خَلَقَ الْأَزْوَاجَ كُلَّهَا وَجَعَلَ لَكُمْ مِنَ الْفُلْكِ وَالْأَنْعَامِ مَا تَرْكَبُونَ
(43:70:4) wa-azwājukum and your spouses ادْخُلُوا الْجَنَّةَ أَنْتُمْ وَأَزْوَاجُكُمْ تُحْبَرُونَ
(50:7:10) zawjin kind وَأَلْقَيْنَا فِيهَا رَوَاسِيَ وَأَنْبَتْنَا فِيهَا مِنْ كُلِّ زَوْجٍ بَهِيجٍ
(51:49:5) zawjayni pairs وَمِنْ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ خَلَقْنَا زَوْجَيْنِ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَذَكَّرُونَ
(53:45:3) l-zawjayni the pairs وَأَنَّهُ خَلَقَ الزَّوْجَيْنِ الذَّكَرَ وَالْأُنْثَىٰ
(55:52:5) zawjāni (in) pairs فِيهِمَا مِنْ كُلِّ فَاكِهَةٍ زَوْجَانِ
(56:7:2) azwājan kinds وَكُنْتُمْ أَزْوَاجًا ثَلَاثَةً
(58:1:8) zawjihā her husband قَدْ سَمِعَ اللَّهُ قَوْلَ الَّتِي تُجَادِلُكَ فِي زَوْجِهَا
(60:11:5) azwājikum your wives وَإِنْ فَاتَكُمْ شَيْءٌ مِنْ أَزْوَاجِكُمْ إِلَى الْكُفَّارِ فَعَاقَبْتُمْ فَآتُوا الَّذِينَ ذَهَبَتْ أَزْوَاجُهُمْ مِثْلَ مَا أَنْفَقُوا
(60:11:12) azwājuhum their wives فَآتُوا الَّذِينَ ذَهَبَتْ أَزْوَاجُهُمْ مِثْلَ مَا أَنْفَقُوا
(64:14:6) azwājikum your spouses إِنَّ مِنْ أَزْوَاجِكُمْ وَأَوْلَادِكُمْ عَدُوًّا لَكُمْ فَاحْذَرُوهُمْ
(66:1:11) azwājika your wives يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ لِمَ تُحَرِّمُ مَا أَحَلَّ اللَّهُ لَكَ تَبْتَغِي مَرْضَاتَ أَزْوَاجِكَ
(66:3:6) azwājihi (of) his wives وَإِذْ أَسَرَّ النَّبِيُّ إِلَىٰ بَعْضِ أَزْوَاجِهِ حَدِيثًا
(66:5:7) azwājan wives عَسَىٰ رَبُّهُ إِنْ طَلَّقَكُنَّ أَنْ يُبْدِلَهُ أَزْوَاجًا خَيْرًا مِنْكُنَّ
(70:30:3) azwājihim their spouses إِلَّا عَلَىٰ أَزْوَاجِهِمْ أَوْ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُهُمْ فَإِنَّهُمْ غَيْرُ مَلُومِينَ
(75:39:3) l-zawjayni two kinds فَجَعَلَ مِنْهُ الزَّوْجَيْنِ الذَّكَرَ وَالْأُنْثَىٰ
(78:8:2) azwājan (in) pairs وَخَلَقْنَاكُمْ أَزْوَاجًا
See Also Lane's Lexicon
- Classical Arabic dictionary
http://corpus.quran.com/qurandictionary.jsp?q=zwj
Regards
(33:53:60) azwājahu his wives وَلَا أَنْ تَنْكِحُوا أَزْوَاجَهُ مِنْ بَعْدِهِ أَبَدًا
(33:59:4) li-azwājika to your wives يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُلْ لِأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِنْ جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ
(35:11:10) azwājan pairs وَاللَّهُ خَلَقَكُمْ مِنْ تُرَابٍ ثُمَّ مِنْ نُطْفَةٍ ثُمَّ جَعَلَكُمْ أَزْوَاجًا
(36:36:4) l-azwāja (in) pairs سُبْحَانَ الَّذِي خَلَقَ الْأَزْوَاجَ كُلَّهَا مِمَّا تُنْبِتُ الْأَرْضُ
(36:56:2) wa-azwājuhum and their spouses هُمْ وَأَزْوَاجُهُمْ فِي ظِلَالٍ عَلَى الْأَرَائِكِ مُتَّكِئُونَ
(37:22:4) wa-azwājahum and their kinds احْشُرُوا الَّذِينَ ظَلَمُوا وَأَزْوَاجَهُمْ وَمَا كَانُوا يَعْبُدُونَ
(38:58:4) azwājun (of various) kinds وَآخَرُ مِنْ شَكْلِهِ أَزْوَاجٌ
(39:6:8) zawjahā its mate خَلَقَكُمْ مِنْ نَفْسٍ وَاحِدَةٍ ثُمَّ جَعَلَ مِنْهَا زَوْجَهَا
(39:6:14) azwājin kinds ثُمَّ جَعَلَ مِنْهَا زَوْجَهَا وَأَنْزَلَ لَكُمْ مِنَ الْأَنْعَامِ ثَمَانِيَةَ أَزْوَاجٍ
(40:8:11) wa-azwājihim and their spouses وَمَنْ صَلَحَ مِنْ آبَائِهِمْ وَأَزْوَاجِهِمْ وَذُرِّيَّاتِهِمْ
(42:11:8) azwājan mates فَاطِرُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ جَعَلَ لَكُمْ مِنْ أَنْفُسِكُمْ أَزْوَاجًا
(42:11:11) azwājan mates وَمِنَ الْأَنْعَامِ أَزْوَاجًا يَذْرَؤُكُمْ فِيهِ لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ
(43:12:3) l-azwāja the pairs وَالَّذِي خَلَقَ الْأَزْوَاجَ كُلَّهَا وَجَعَلَ لَكُمْ مِنَ الْفُلْكِ وَالْأَنْعَامِ مَا تَرْكَبُونَ
(43:70:4) wa-azwājukum and your spouses ادْخُلُوا الْجَنَّةَ أَنْتُمْ وَأَزْوَاجُكُمْ تُحْبَرُونَ
(50:7:10) zawjin kind وَأَلْقَيْنَا فِيهَا رَوَاسِيَ وَأَنْبَتْنَا فِيهَا مِنْ كُلِّ زَوْجٍ بَهِيجٍ
(51:49:5) zawjayni pairs وَمِنْ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ خَلَقْنَا زَوْجَيْنِ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَذَكَّرُونَ
(53:45:3) l-zawjayni the pairs وَأَنَّهُ خَلَقَ الزَّوْجَيْنِ الذَّكَرَ وَالْأُنْثَىٰ
(55:52:5) zawjāni (in) pairs فِيهِمَا مِنْ كُلِّ فَاكِهَةٍ زَوْجَانِ
(56:7:2) azwājan kinds وَكُنْتُمْ أَزْوَاجًا ثَلَاثَةً
(58:1:8) zawjihā her husband قَدْ سَمِعَ اللَّهُ قَوْلَ الَّتِي تُجَادِلُكَ فِي زَوْجِهَا
(60:11:5) azwājikum your wives وَإِنْ فَاتَكُمْ شَيْءٌ مِنْ أَزْوَاجِكُمْ إِلَى الْكُفَّارِ فَعَاقَبْتُمْ فَآتُوا الَّذِينَ ذَهَبَتْ أَزْوَاجُهُمْ مِثْلَ مَا أَنْفَقُوا
(60:11:12) azwājuhum their wives فَآتُوا الَّذِينَ ذَهَبَتْ أَزْوَاجُهُمْ مِثْلَ مَا أَنْفَقُوا
(64:14:6) azwājikum your spouses إِنَّ مِنْ أَزْوَاجِكُمْ وَأَوْلَادِكُمْ عَدُوًّا لَكُمْ فَاحْذَرُوهُمْ
(66:1:11) azwājika your wives يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ لِمَ تُحَرِّمُ مَا أَحَلَّ اللَّهُ لَكَ تَبْتَغِي مَرْضَاتَ أَزْوَاجِكَ
(66:3:6) azwājihi (of) his wives وَإِذْ أَسَرَّ النَّبِيُّ إِلَىٰ بَعْضِ أَزْوَاجِهِ حَدِيثًا
(66:5:7) azwājan wives عَسَىٰ رَبُّهُ إِنْ طَلَّقَكُنَّ أَنْ يُبْدِلَهُ أَزْوَاجًا خَيْرًا مِنْكُنَّ
(70:30:3) azwājihim their spouses إِلَّا عَلَىٰ أَزْوَاجِهِمْ أَوْ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُهُمْ فَإِنَّهُمْ غَيْرُ مَلُومِينَ
(75:39:3) l-zawjayni two kinds فَجَعَلَ مِنْهُ الزَّوْجَيْنِ الذَّكَرَ وَالْأُنْثَىٰ
(78:8:2) azwājan (in) pairs وَخَلَقْنَاكُمْ أَزْوَاجًا
See Also Lane's Lexicon
http://corpus.quran.com/qurandictionary.jsp?q=zwj
Regards
Last edited:
YmirGF
Bodhisattva in Recovery
Likewise, if one removes all the naughty things that Hitler did, and look at some of the good things he did with an open mind, even Hitler can seem like a really nice guy.What you are really describing is called "suspension of disbelief". We do it all the time watching TV and movies.