Milton Platt
Well-Known Member
I don't need to. Use whatever thing is in existence today explode it, electrocute it, or mix it with chemicals bring it to life any thing you want to do. I'll wait and accept your belief then.
Take what ever you consider the first life, nurture it , mate it, give it drugs create an intelligence the can create a watch and I'll take back all I said. I'll wait and accept your belief then.
You don't even have to duplicate just show me the actual path intelligence took so that man can make a watch, take the closest creature to us and show me scientifically reproducible steps to get the intelligence to create a watch. I'll wait and accept your belief then.
If its is not scientifically credible which means ability to duplicate among other things, it might as well be God.
So you want me to duplicate in my lifetime what took billions of years to happen naturally.
Why is it you need no proof? What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. It isn't that you don't need to. It's that you can't and you know that. You are asking me to detail every step in abogenisis before you will accept it. And yet you are unwilling to supply the same detail about how your god did it.
Your assertion is far more unlikely than abiogenis. You are not only assertimg life came from non-living matter (dust) but are then asserting that there was also a supernatural god involved.
Nobody has said we understand all the details of abiogenesis. But we are getting closer to an understanding. We have a number of pieces of the puzzle. But it is okay to say we do 't know and keep looking. It is not okay to fill in the holes in our knowledge with "god did it".