Esteban X
Active Member
Why don't you just pull your head out of your *** and actually read the links that we provide.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
There is irrefutable evidence from Polonium halos that the rock layers of the Grand Canyon where all formed in a short time, the worldwide flood.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
They are not all going to be the same but some area of the Earth are subject to flash flooding even today. A migrating herd caught in a flash flood could make graveyard like that instantly. One thing that shows that it is a natural flood of a specific time period many millions of years ago is that all of the fossil species are of the same time period. The Noah's Ark myth cannot explain sorting by time. We never see a brontosaur with a T-Rex. In fact if I got a list of what dinosaurs existed when I could generate a long long list of dinosaurs that are never seen together.
ChieftheCef
Well-Known Member
It's just like, dude, you wouldn't show us bad studies when everyone and their mother is looking out for Monotheists and their faulty claims...
It is happy sun though. Remember, Christians compared their savior to the sun:
It is happy sun though. Remember, Christians compared their savior to the sun:
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Satan fooled those pagans that worshipped the sun, like Satan fools the modern pagans who deny God Almighty the creator of all things.
Dimi95
Прaвославие!
Gentry's Tiny Mystery Unsupported by Geology | National Center for Science Education
"My understanding is that all the assertions in the Bible which pertain to science would be true." -Robert V. Gentry Cross-examination McLean v. Arkansas, 1981
One thing to note is that Creatonist also criticize Gentry's work..
Last edited:
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
First it only addresses one aspect of his work. Second the article actually does not address any of his work as it is just comparing apples and oranges. Babe Ruth hit 714 home runs and was one of the greatest home run hitters of all time, He also hit singles. So since he hit singles, does that mean he did not hit any home runs? That is the line of reasoning of the book. The article also uses false assumptions ans to what happened during the flood. Evolutionists do the same thing.Gentry's Tiny Mystery Unsupported by Geology | National Center for Science Education
"My understanding is that all the assertions in the Bible which pertain to science would be true." -Robert V. Gentry Cross-examination McLean v. Arkansas, 1981ncse.ngo
One thing to note is that Creatonist also criticize Gentry's work..
Esteban X
Active Member
Then they have that in common
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
No.
The alternative is not drawing a priori conclusions and instead let the evidence shape the worldview.
If the bible is correct, then following the evidence would lead you to the bible model anyway.
There's no need to start with assumed conclusions. That is a fallacious approach when the goal is to actually seek justified models of reality.
The way you approach it, your goals seems to be nothing more then trying to paint the bullseye around the arrow.
This is not how you find correct answers to questions.