The psychology of the God of the gaps. It doesn't sound like it explains the Bible however.
The folklore, culture and history of Sumerian and Semitic Mesopotamia and Semitic Canaan explain the bible. It's a remarkable record.
You say show me but don't show me the evidence that you have to accept by faith because that is not real evidence and that needs to be shown to be true.
You want to believe the materialistic worldview by faith but refuse the evidence for faith in the non materialistic worldview.
I believe in a materialistic world, but not by faith. I only have to open my eyes, pick up my morning cup of coffee, walk to the shops, to know that a world exists external to me, and I've known that since very early in life. I'd be surprised if you were to argue with any of that.
But I don't see how the immateriality of gods, spirits, demons, angels, all over the world and all through history, in uncountable numbers, represent any other part of reality than the psychology of evolved humans.
I say yet again, if you want me to believe God is real, then simply give me a satisfactory demonstration of a real god. After all, that's how I know there are real pandas, real chimpanzees, real sea squirts, and through the microscope real microorganisms and through the telescope real galaxies, on and on.
My argument is that I have faith in God and your argument is that you don't have faith in God and that you don't want to have faith in God.
I don't doubt you have faith in God. I simply point out that God is not a real being, since if [he] were a real being you could show [him] to me. Instead, you can't even tell me what species of real being [he] is.
Where is that definition of "real" I asked you for?