ppp
Well-Known Member
He won't. His brain is still mired thinking that throwing out the names of people is meaningful.Spoilsport! I wanted to hear him tell us how it is evidence for a God without using an argument from ignorance.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
He won't. His brain is still mired thinking that throwing out the names of people is meaningful.Spoilsport! I wanted to hear him tell us how it is evidence for a God without using an argument from ignorance.
I know you asked Brian2, but I did look up some information about the genetic code. And no scientific explanation that I read about can explain really how it came about. They can explain certain things about it, like the proteins and maybe how it happened, but that is why I asked in my slightly funny question -- what is more intelligent? The human, or his genetic code?So to be clear....
is it the genetic code itself you claim as evidence or that Antony Flew believes it?
I know you're responding to whoever, but cite the peer reviewed scientific papers that you looked up.I know you asked Brian2, but I did look up some information about the genetic code. And no scientific explanation that I read about can explain really how it came about.
Seems to me that that would depend entirely upon which human you are asking about.... what is more intelligent? The human, or his genetic code?
lol - whatever if you say so --Seems to me that that would depend entirely upon which human you are asking about.
I understand you may have a hard time believing it, but genetic code is really not that difficult to understand.lol - whatever if you say so --
I am speaking not of its existence but its beginning. It's not hard to understand that scientists themselves do not know how the genetic code began. If you know more than that, please say so. Thanks.I understand you may have a hard time believing it, but genetic code is really not that difficult to understand.
You seem confused.I am speaking not of its existence but its beginning. It's not hard to understand that scientists themselves do not know how the genetic code began. If you know more than that, please say so. Thanks.
Let's say that they have no clue how life began. Then what?I am speaking not of its existence but its beginning. It's not hard to understand that scientists themselves do not know how the genetic code began. If you know more than that, please say so. Thanks.
I was not referring to religion and faith. Not sure how you arrived at that. I was referring to "faith, belief, and knowledge" per the post by PureX I was quoting.Piffle. No one thinks that religion and faith are the same thing. Faith is holding a position without epistemic warrant. Some religious beliefs are just specific instances of faith. Plenty of people hold such faith beliefs both with and without religion. Purexs disdain is about bringing others down. Never support for his own views.
Sorry, I just thought your comment was funny. Maybe you didn't mean it to be. Have a good one.You seem confused.
you asked "what is more intelligent? The human, or his genetic code?"
"I find that theists and atheists alike are doggedly determined to confuse and conflate faith with religious belief. The theists do it because their religion teaches them this unfortunate nonsense."I was not referring to religion and faith. Not sure how you arrived at that. I was referring to "faith, belief, and knowledge" per the post by PureX I was quoting.
Then they have no clue.Let's say that they have no clue how life began. Then what?
Correct. If they have no clue, then they have no clue.Then they have no clue.
Yuphe mystery of how it formed is still there.
I see no evidence that you know (or care0) whether or how much of the origin of of life is a mystery. Do you?But I think we were speaking about the genetic code. And to reiterate, while it is a mystery now, and cannot be solved now
Who cares?what I understand Flew felt that the mystery of it evidently turned him to God
Then why are you bringing up the genetic code? You have sunk one Hell of a lot of pointless, hollow words into talking about the genetic code only to acknowledge that you have said nothing relevant to whether or not your god exists. C'mon, dude. Focus and quit rambling.I do not need the fantastic genetic code to convince me there is a God although it is awesome imo
Again, who cares?we all have beliefs in one way or another.
They have a pretty good idea. But for some odd reason you insist on believing that something that you have no reliable evidence for was behind it.I am speaking not of its existence but its beginning. It's not hard to understand that scientists themselves do not know how the genetic code began. If you know more than that, please say so. Thanks.
If you're addressing what I said, it doesn't matter what the main body is about if that's not what I was talking about. But no matter, you know now. Did you have anything to offer on what I was talking about, or did you want to maintain your position about a point I didn't make? I'm good either way."I find that theists and atheists alike are doggedly determined to confuse and conflate faith with religious belief. The theists do it because their religion teaches them this unfortunate nonsense."
The main body of the post to which you were replying was about religion and faith. I am confused as to your (apparent) confusion. Perhaps you were not fastidious in your reading.
Unfortunately, God could hover in the air right in front of me in a blinding blaze of glory, right now, and I still would have no possible way of verifying that what I am witnessing is God as opposed to some clever magician's trick. Or some advanced space alien's form of visitation, or even a trick of my own mind, or perhaps even a demon. So all the messengers God could send me still could never be verified. And lacking that verification, we are lying to ourselves and others if we claim we can "know" whatever they say is a message from God. Or that they even are messengers from God. I don't even see how THEY could know.Any proposed characterisation of a designer is imaginary unless it has been revealed to us by the designer. That is the position of the Bible believers at least.
But it is meanigful. Just about the name dropper, though.He won't. His brain is still mired thinking that throwing out the names of people is meaningful.
If you are not addressing the post to which you are replying then it doesn't matter what you said.If you're addressing what I said, it doesn't matter what the main body is about
What really amazes me is the complexity of the DNA strand. You can actually use it for storage of data like a flash drive. IMV a mystery of how it actually came to being. IMV, maybe not so much a mystery with a God factor.I know you asked Brian2, but I did look up some information about the genetic code. And no scientific explanation that I read about can explain really how it came about. They can explain certain things about it, like the proteins and maybe how it happened, but that is why I asked in my slightly funny question -- what is more intelligent? The human, or his genetic code?
Oh, and I didn't need Anthony Flew to get me to believe in God which I did later in life (not that late but after years of not believing). But the mystery (yes, mystery) of how the genetic code came about it is obviously in my opinion more than what the human mind is capable of both replicating and understanding. It is beyond human wisdom and science. In my opinion.