This that you are saying, @paarsurrey , is inherently nonsensical.
You are confusing two very different matters with only tangential connection, and treating them as if they were one and the same thing.
One is the state of being an atheist, which is very simple and really ought not to confuse theists nearly as much as it apparently does. An atheist lacks belief in deities. It is really that simple. There are no claims, no need for support, no consequences. Nothing. You might perhaps decide for whatever reason to doubt one's sincerity, but even that is at the very least weird.
The second is whether there is, in fact, some deity. That is not atheism, nor is that even theism. It is instead a matter for theology to deal with. The presumed existence is not at all the same thing as the belief in existence - at least if it is a God such as that which Ibrahim declared that we are talking about.
It is really way too much, bordering into if not being abuse outright, to expect an atheist to feel any duty to justify, evidence or even "prove" his or her own atheism. One's word is plenty enough.
Frankly, this expectation from some theists that we should "embrace God" for apparently no sound reason is as puzzling as it is abusive. And it does not help that it usually comes from people who show quite patently to have little clue of the very nature of atheism.
