YmirGF
Bodhisattva in Recovery
Redundant rhetorical reflexes, eh?It seems that "deja vu" no longer exists without the suffix "all over again".
Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Redundant rhetorical reflexes, eh?It seems that "deja vu" no longer exists without the suffix "all over again".
Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ya, you betcha sure!Redundant rhetorical reflexes, eh?
If you keep up using "irregardless", it might eventually become a perfectly cromulent word.Being a budding linguistic architect, I will often toss the word "Irregardless" into a sentence to spice things up. It always amuses me when people attempt to correct me because I am likely far more familiar with the flexibility of language than the person seeking to correct me. The thicker dullards actually have the temerity to argue the point. What it takes them awhile to digest is that I am always using it in a factious sense mocking peoples lack of verbal dexterity.
Maybe a prostate problem.As a man I can't stand it when I go to the bathroom to take a leak, get done and give it several shakes, wipe, tuck it back in my pants and then some more dribbles out, soaking my boxers, pants and leg...sigh. What the hell?!
Guess that comes with age.
wait...it's not in-te-GR-al???I hate it when people put the accent on the 2nd syllable of "integral".
But not so "syllable" because it sounds humorous.
I prefer "in teh grahl"wait...it's not in-te-GR-al???
It's not cheating....it's "marketing".It is cheating, so of course, with God watching me, I don't do it.
No, I do not think so. Marketing is for selling. Sellers and helpers have to take the risk that the item won't sell. It is gambling.It's not cheating....it's "marketing".
I was josh'n ya.No, I do not think so. Marketing is for selling. Sellers and helpers have to take the risk that the item won't sell. It is gambling.
And people who should apologize don'tRegularly, (it seems daily, but is probably more like a few times a week) I have been noticing when I connect to the internet, there is at least one new story on my homepage about someone apologizing for saying something.
I wonder how such silly stuff as who said the wrong thing and caused an outcry...and is being pressured to apologize...has become such a regular topic for stories.
If news stories followed the newspaper format, Public Apologies would be its own section.
(It's not an apology that annoys me, it is the frequency of focus upon it.)