Augustus
…
I will stand by my claim that when actually investigated the police usually do not come out as being in the wrong
Incidents that actually get investigated are a tiny minority of the total incidents of police misconduct. The ones which do get investigated also have to come up against a culture of police covering each other's backs. Then there is a very high bar to clear to 'prove' their response was inappropriate.
The deck is very much stacked in their favour.
There is a sizeable minority of cops who enjoy their power and use it abusively. Any profession has its 'bad apples', and joining the police is also attractive people with a certain mindset. Also the nature of police work can create an us against them attitude.
Even if we assume (very generously) that 90% of cops are paladins of virtue, that still leaves a whole lot of problems. It also makes it reasonable to distrust cops in general as you can't tell the good from the bad from a distance.
Are you an advocate of body cams? I am. The protect both the police and the accused. LA is a fairly modern city. Don't the cops there have body cams?
In general a good thing, although we can expect plenty of 'malfunctions' at convenient times. Being caught on camera committing abuses still isn't always enough though, as the Eric Garner case clearly demonstrated.
The deck is still stacked.