Francine
Well-Known Member
"Begotten" in Greek translates as "generated". Zygotes are not "generated"
Those 400 million little swimmers in every ejaculation? Zygote generators, all of them.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
"Begotten" in Greek translates as "generated". Zygotes are not "generated"
Those 400 million little swimmers in every ejaculation? Zygote generators, all of them.
No. Not the creation of Jesus Biblically or by the Quranic narrative. Not generation. Both sperm and ova are generated, the zygote comes about by fusion. In the case of Jesus there was no sperm.
i dont know you will have to ask maimonedes but i think he is dead[/list]Did God create Auschwitz? Did God watch and control Auschwitz?
The Judeo-Christian God (i don't know about the muslim God) appears from the original texts (OT & NT) to be a God that interviens with the world. God may be in control of everything, but may not directly cause everything. A theory is just like cold is the abcence of heat, could evil (auchwitz etc.) be the abcence of God.
just a thought
*Praise the Lawd!! :shout*
or it could be a genocidal anti semetic political movement called national socialism :yes:
by national socialism i assume you are talking about the Nazis? Well, the Nazis did not worship the Christian God and deffinitly not the Jewish God, they worshiped the Sun (wikipedia it, i'm sure its there)
i would be interested in the concept of common prayer which is acceptable to these three diverse religionsThe similarities of Judaism, Christainity and Islam are that they all mention successive revelations and Messengers... All claim to be monotheist and trace themselves back to a common Source.. All share common ethics and love of the Creator...They all have a vested interest in Jerusalem... Judaism does not recognize any revelations from the new testament,Christianity does not recognize any revelations in the Quran all claim to have a belief in one god except the mystery of the trinity and i have yet to actually get a rational explanation for the Islamic vested interest in Jerusalem and they certainly don't share common ethics
At various periods of history they have lived peacefully together but we remember better of course the negative conflicts.. when was this and please don't say Andalusia
Today I think the best example of how Muslims, Christians and Jews can get along is in inter-faith dialogue and organizations: true they can recognize each others existence but can never reconcile each others beliefs
The World Paliament of Religions that is held from time to time..
Parliament of the World's Religions - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and local Inter-faith councils..
I would urge anyone to particpate in their local inter-faith council to experience common prayer and common goals!
- Art
.i would be interested in the concept of common prayer which is acceptable to these three diverse religions
.
In the agencies with which I have worked, we've always taken turns with prayers at open and close of the meetings. Sometimes special prayers for healing or unity are given as well and turns are taken with that as well.
The Muslims may think that the Baha`is are misled or mistaken, but they do not cause disunity in those meetings by pointing it out or refusing to participate in prayers.
Men of good will will find a way to work toward good objectives in unison with others of good will.
Regards,
Scott
i find that very admirable Scott, the more this happens the more understanding can flourish
this is the commision directly from christ after in a vision on the road to damascus
Yes, I know the Muslims claim the Bible was corrupted, but the problem with this theory is that there's no actual evidence to support it. The evidence that we do have overwhelming shows that the Bible is the most creditable ancient literary document of all time. There are over 24,000 New Testament manuscripts that have been found, nearly 6000 that have been found in the original Greek it was written in. We have fragments of the New Testament from as little as 30 years after the original was first written, and at least one complete copy for all of the Biblical books of the New Testament around 150 years after they were first written. In contrast, there are been no Qur'an manuscripts fragments dated before 120 years after Muhammad's death, and the entire Qur'an is not found until 200 years after Muhammad's death.
Number of New Testament Manuscripts:
New Testament: 24,000; 6000 in the original Greek
Qur'an: ?????
Time between Earliest Fragment and the Original Writing:
New Testament: 30 years
Qur'an: 120 years
Time between the Earliest Complete copy and the Original Writing:
New Testament: 150 years
Qur'an: 200 years
Number of Uncertainties about what was Written in the Original Text:
Bible: 120 - 99.8% Accuracy
Qur'an: ?????
There's no question that the New Testament is much more credible than the Qur'an in the area of Textual Criticism. The New Testament can be proven unchanged over the past 1800 years. The only room for corruption would have been in the 150 years between the original, and even then it is very unlikely due to the many fragments of manuscripts that have been found. Any chance that the Bible has been corrupted is small in comparison to the chance that the Qur'an has been corrupted since the Qur'an has much fewer manuscripts and a larger period of time between the original and the first fragments and the first complete copy. There is no valid reason to believe the New Testament has become corrupt without also believing that every other work of ancient literature, including the Qur'an, has also become corrupt, since the New Testament has more support than all others.