Considering that the aforementioned Wikipedia article's sources include The Watchtower, what's your impression?Is Wikipedia being lead by Gods truths.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Considering that the aforementioned Wikipedia article's sources include The Watchtower, what's your impression?Is Wikipedia being lead by Gods truths.
So wikipedia defines the truth of the Gospel for you. Wikipedia only says what JW believe it to be, not what it is.Is Wikipedia being lead by Gods truths. The FDS are.
I do not know what the other person was talking about but the bible says that all who are born gain by faith in the crucufixion are part of the family of God and are part of the kingdom of God. That is in my understanding what is meant by the true followers of God. Even if we dissagree on a verse or two here and there, even if we get it wrong in some areas we Christians belong to Christ who said he would not lose a single one of us but raise us up on the last day, as well as saying he would not leave us nor forsake us. Period.I guess one person's false teachings is anothers single true religion, and vice versa.
I guess one person's false teachings is anothers single true religion, and vice versa.
This is reality-- 0ne truth--one true religion has it.
Deleted Post
The number of religious we have today is a direct result of people changing the original word of God.
I personally believe that most religions came from one source. I believe followers of different profits and messengers that GOD sent altered their religion slowly over time and that is why we have different religions today.
The Abrahamic religions started in one geographical location and spread from there over time. Thats a fact. It is evidence to me that religion is a human invention and spread by humans. Why did all the prophets of the abrahamic religions pop up in the middle east and nowhere else? Why were there no prophets popping up in the Far east, Austrailia, the Americas? Can you answer that?
The Abrahamic religions started in one geographical location and spread from there over time. Thats a fact. It is evidence to me that religion is a human invention and spread by humans. Why did all the prophets of the abrahamic religions pop up in the middle east and nowhere else? Why were there no prophets popping up in the Far east, Austrailia, the Americas? Can you answer that?
There is a very easy explenation for that: ABRAHAM WAS IN THE MIDDLE EAST. If you actually want a complete answer. God searched the world for someone who would follow him, I do not know how many he examined but he found Abraham and made a covenant with him and his posterity. That posterity was Israel whom God had decided to reveal himself through and he held them to a very high standard and opposed influence from outside "Heathen" tribes. They existed in the middle east as well and that is why. They were used as a conduit for God and eventually his Messiah but both were meant for the Gentiles and the world as a whole. Judgeing from the pervasivness of Christianity it all worked out exactly as intended. You may have some preference about the issue but you have no valid reason to claim that this has not been the case.The Abrahamic religions started in one geographical location and spread from there over time. Thats a fact. It is evidence to me that religion is a human invention and spread by humans. Why did all the prophets of the abrahamic religions pop up in the middle east and nowhere else? Why were there no prophets popping up in the Far east, Austrailia, the Americas? Can you answer that?
The Abrahamic religions started in one geographical location and spread from there over time. Thats a fact. It is evidence to me that religion is a human invention and spread by humans. Why did all the prophets of the abrahamic religions pop up in the middle east and nowhere else? Why were there no prophets popping up in the Far east, Austrailia, the Americas? Can you answer that?
There is a very easy explenation for that: ABRAHAM WAS IN THE MIDDLE EAST. If you actually want a complete answer. God searched the world for someone who would follow him, I do not know how many he examined but he found Abraham and made a covenant with him and his posterity. That posterity was Israel whom God had decided to reveal himself through and he held them to a very high standard and opposed influence from outside "Heathen" tribes. They existed in the middle east as well and that is why. They were used as a conduit for God and eventually his Messiah but both were meant for the Gentiles and the world as a whole. Judgeing from the pervasivness of Christianity it all worked out exactly as intended. You may have some preference about the issue but you have no valid reason to claim that this has not been the case.
Well where you been? If they are all Gods messengers why are they all saying different and contradictory things? There is no correlation or reason between Prophet hood and whatever is arbitrarily decided as the worst place. In fact it is rather contrary to the function of a prophet in many cases and has very little correlation and that is only coincedence.Baha'i Scriptures explain, Messengers always appear in the worst and darkest place on earth. Abrahamic Messengers or No-Abrahamic Messengers in Baha'i View are all God's Messengers, and they all appeared in the worst place in their own time. Muhammad appeared between wild tribes of Arabs. Baha'u'llah appeared between fanatic and superstitious persians, and so on. Prophet Soloman appeared between wild tribes, He knew how to speak with those Animals (The wild Tribes of animal people!)
Buddha, Krishna,Zoroaster, Socrates etc. were non-Abrahamic; they were messengers prophets of the one true attributive creator God, in my opinion.
There is a very easy explenation for that: ABRAHAM WAS IN THE MIDDLE EAST. If you actually want a complete answer. God searched the world for someone who would follow him, I do not know how many he examined but he found Abraham and made a covenant with him and his posterity. That posterity was Israel whom God had decided to reveal himself through and he held them to a very high standard and opposed influence from outside "Heathen" tribes. They existed in the middle east as well and that is why. They were used as a conduit for God and eventually his Messiah but both were meant for the Gentiles and the world as a whole. Judgeing from the pervasivness of Christianity it all worked out exactly as intended. You may have some preference about the issue but you have no valid reason to claim that this has not been the case.
If your argument was an explenation of why God centered his revelation on the middle east then fine. However I imagine your argument is trying to gain credability by association with a competant explenation of history.Thank you for supporting my arguement.