Top Iranian General Killed in Airstrike

[mojtaba]

That is not an obligation as you claimed nor imposing a culture. Look up what being an advocate is. Refusing to trade with someone is not a cultural imposition. It is refusing to trade with Iran because of how Iran acts. Ergo disagreement not imposing. Try again and get a dictionary.

What does this mean?
"This announcement is widely being seen as an attempt to challenge and target Iran and potentially get international support for sanctions."

Evidence?

Evidence?

How can I make an english evedence for you? I can not make it for you. Do you think that I am a liar?

 

[Shad]

What does this mean?
"This announcement is widely being seen as an attempt to challenge and target Iran and potentially get international support for sanctions."

Sanctions are not imposing a culture. It is rejecting of trade due to disagreement. No one is obligated to trade with anyone just because they want to trade. Sanctions are a consequence of Iran's actions. Iran is still free to have those laws. Just as the US is free to not trade with Iran.

Would you do business with someone you considered a murder?

How can I make an english evedence for you? I can not make it for you. Do you think that I am a liar?

I think you have be repeating propaganda hence been lied to.

 

[Revoltingest]

I think you have be repeating propaganda hence been lied to.

 

[Shad]

Now prove your claim or are you going to ignore that like you ignore Iran's own actions?

 

[Revoltingest]

Now prove your claim or are you going to ignore that like you ignore Iran's own actions?

I only point out that buying into propaganda
can afflict anyone...even those who accuse
others of repeating it. So it's a criticism best
left unspoken.

 

[Shad]

I only point out that buying into propaganda
can afflict anyone...even those who accuse
others of repeating it. So it's a criticism best
left unspoken.

The difference is I made an argument to prove my claim. Your point is unsubstantiated thus a throw away remark of little merit. Yawn.

 

[mojtaba]

I do not need to lie. I am not a liar.

It is 11 pm in Iran. I want to attend the funeral of Soleimani tomorrow morning. So I should go to bed.

Have a nice time.

 

[Revoltingest]

The difference is I made an argument to prove my claim.

But they were unconvincing, being based upon different values & assumptions.
You're no less subject to propaganda than those on the other side.

 

[Shad]

I do not need to lie. I am not a liar.

I never said you were. I said you were lied to and repeat those lies as if a truth.

 

[Shad]

But they were unconvincing, being based upon different values & assumptions.

Wrong. It was based on definitions of words in English. No values were used at all. The user used specific words and made specific claim. It is not my problem he has issues with English which results in words not meaning what he thinks they mean.

Being subject to is not the same as repeating it which that user was doing in my view.

 

[Revoltingest]

Wrong. It was based on definitions of words in English. No values were used at all. The user used specific words and made specific claim. It is not my problem he has issues with English which results in words not meaning what he thinks they mean.

I'm not seeing this claimed superior facility with English.
But I do see hatred, anger, prejudice, & disregard for human life.

 

[Stanyon]

Being against assassinations goes far beyond my sense of morality.

So you wouldn't endorse assassination under any circumstance?

You don't have to virtue signal, let it go, set it down like a burdensome sack and free yourself.

 

[Shad]

I'm not seeing this claimed superior facility with English.

Look the misuse of obligation in relation to sanctions.

But I do see hatred, anger, prejudice, & disregard for human life.

Such as?

 

[Revoltingest]

Such as?

It's a general theme in your posts about Iran.
I know that nothing I can say will convince
you of this, so we must agree to disagree.

Btw, I don't hold this against you. I've friends
who hold similar values & views. I just disagree.
It's not personal. But you did invite my personal
observations...views I'd have otherwise left
unspoken.

 

[Shad]

It's a general theme in your posts about Iran.

You are assuming a hatred because I am blunt and direct with my opinion of military actions. I do not hate Iran. I think it needs to be countered and disagree with kids gloves approach.

Some actions requires one to separate themselves from becoming emotional due to human attachments otherwise some actions will never be taken as people become buried by the numbers. Do note I never suggested a war, an invasion nor massive action at this time. More so I am not willing to concede to terrorist tactics which are designed to cow the public due to causalities. That is the purpose of the tactic. Killing public will power.

The issues with Iran have existed like this for a decade and more since the second Iraq War. It seems like most people only care about the costs when the media tells them to.

 

[Revoltingest]

You are assuming.....

See...I told you we wouldn't agree.
There's no value in pursuing it further.

 

[Shad]

See...I told you we wouldn't agree.

So? I am correcting your misconceptions.

 

[Wandering Monk]

Fair enough. So go to war with Iran and kill millions of women as well?

Did I suggest such a thing?

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

Yes, we pledge the flag and skip the "under god" part. Yes, we see football teams praying before and after games. Yes, we half of us see Fox and Hannity and the rest of the Right Wing nut cases. Yes, we see mega churches dominating the Sunday morning airwaves.


However, that is peanuts to what the average person is subjected to in countries like Saudi Arabia or Iran or NK.

You reference North Korea but fail to recognize and understand the vast difference in the amount of indoctrination those people receive compared to us.

Uh-huh. Pretty happy with my initial point, actually. I suggest it is you that fails to understand the amount of indoctrination you recieve. That's OK, you can't help it. It's one of those "fish have no word for water" type things.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

My comment, once again, was in response to:

Another point I stand by.