Another thought which fits well into this thread.
In economy, it is quite common that the solutions a company can find tend to be a direct copy of the communication structure involved. The well-know example is like "if you want to make a compiler and let it do by four teams, the result will be a four-pass-compiler". More figuratively: "process becomes product".
This made me think about religions where we may see the same.
Let us take a look at the Catholics: Their religion is a direct mapping of their church's organisation. It has a strong hierarchy, and no level can talk to anything but one level higher. So the individual Catholic cannot talk to his god directly, he needs, ultimately, the pope.
The protestants, however, do not have such an extremely hierachical organisation, and consequently, every Protestant can talk to his god.
Now when we look at independent Setians, of course they can work directly with Set. This is a direct mirror of the fact that they lack a wordly hierarchy.
The TOS, on the other hand, has his priests. Maybe the fact that Aquino was/is a military officer, accustomed to think in hierarchies, had some part in how he formed his then-new project: process became product. Now a hierarchical priesthood is only necessary if the people think that the priests have some kind of better access to Set, and that is, AFAIK, the TOS' position: The priests have a better understanding of Set.
My aim is not to discuss which position is "right" because no matter what position a certain Setian holds, he would not hold it if he did not consider it as right.
The point is the subtlety of how communication structures influence the outcome. Any comments?