In a gender fluid world, what's the etiquette with using gender pronouns?
I get we should use the person's preferred pronoun, or 'they' is gender neutral, but what about when someone had a significant achievement in their past before they came out as transgendered. The most obvious example is Caitlyn Jenner. Bruce Jenner comes out as a woman named Caitlyn Jenner, great, no problem with that, from that moment on you are now a woman named Caitlyn and we shall use the pronoun 'she'. Easy, done.
But who won the men's decathalon, was name male athlete of the year, and inducted into the track and field hall of fame? Was it the woman Caitlyn or the man Bruce?
I see it as the man Bruce won these things things.
And supposing in the future the woman Caitlyn decides to revert back to the man Bruce, who won woman of the year in 2015, a man named Bruce or a woman named Caitlyn?
It was a woman named Caitlyn.
And we can make this more hypothetical, for example, if George Bush were to come out as transgender, would he be the first woman president?
No. Not in my opinion. Essentially, it is how the person self identifies (publicly) at the time.
And what if this happens after a woman becomes president, does her status as 'first woman president' get rescinded? Or if a woman becomes president and then later becomes transgender, would she still be the first woman president?
Or if Neil Armstrong came out after the moon landing, would he still be the first man on the moon, or would he be the first woman on the moon?
How does transgender apply retroactively? Should it?
And it goes beyond just transgender, really. Who wrote 'When Doves Cry'? Was it Prince, the artist formerly known as Prince, or Prince - the artist formerly known as the artist formerly known as Prince?
Feel I answered the gender ones. I don't believe transgender ought to apply retroactively with regards to public accomplishments. I do think it is debatable. I think if talking directly with the person, it would probably be best to assume it applies, for them, retroactively. But they aren't the only person in charge of their public perception. That's societal.
Regarding Prince, I'm fairly certain Prince wrote "When Doves Cry." The 'Love Symbol' thing occurred later. All songs written under that moniker, ought to be attributed to that symbol, even if it is unpronounceable. That is how the artist self identified publicly at the time.
So what's the etiquette for when someone changes identity? For the average person it isn't really an issue, but when you have significant accomplishments tied to your identity, does the identity tied to those accomplishments change retroactively when the identity is changed in the present or future?
It's all so confusing.
And let's keep this civil OK. This isn't about whether you agree or disagree with being transgender.
The retroactive aspect of this strikes me as a choice proposition and not something that say science or some other endeavor of study could weigh in on without also being political / philosophical. The etiquette, I imagine would only come up if writing a story to be published openly and if it were me, I'd go with how the person self identified at the time publicly. If I were interviewing them, I'd reference that through filter of how they self identify today, but would be as clear as I can that when it comes to time of my writing, I'm going with how they self identified then.