Trump attacks Amazon, calling its shipping deal with Postal Service a 'scam' that must end

[Subduction Zone]

What Trump is basically trying to do is make these multinationals pay a fair price for using national resources in stead of using their enormous weight to create uneven deals, basically exploiting every country they operate in. These big Companies like Google, Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, etc abuse their positions of power. Positions they should not even have in well regulated free market. Anyone believing in a free world not controlled by Multinationals should be happy about this. It brings more money in the local economy and less to the global elite. But as we have been seen consistently the Neoliberals/democrats are basically pushing the multi-nationalist agenda. That is why they want to flood countries with cheap labor behind the guise human interest. If they were so interested in human rights they force these multinationals to pay decent wages in other countries as well.

Because all they do is spread exploitation. Trump is right to make them produce in the US. It is still a great injustice as these multinationals avoid paying taxes in the markets where they make their sales. It is good to force these multinationals where they land to behave more social. It does not harm the low-wage countries either. Now national producers get a chance to take over production and export to richer countries, and that money earned benefits those country. Because multinationals steal from all countries.

Shame on you you democrats. You help no one, only create endless silly melodramatic sideshows about gay rights and that kind of stuff. Like homosexuals are the great victims of society. They generally live a hedonistic lifestyle, have more then average income, and have no kids to support. But these cry babies have been promoted to democratic proof of social interest.

Who do you want to fool? Politics is about fair distribution of income for people in the country, and multinationals should not even have the benefits as national companies. They are the same exploitation rackets that set up the colonies and used slavery to make maximum profit. Of course they want politicians to talk about gays and abortion, that keeps intention away from the real issues, that concern them.

But Trump is trying to address the issues even if has limited leverage. And you can call him a moron as much as you like, you can call his supporters retards, but more and more Americans lost confidence that democrats will ever do anything concrete. They had an excellent chance with Bernie Sanders to prove their sincerity, but in stead showed their real colors.

If the Post Office gave the same rates as other companies they would probably stick with UPS or FedEx. The Post Office does not have the best reputation after all. By lowering their price they got work that they would not otherwise get and have a chance to prove that they can do the job. The Post Office has profited from this deal. Trump is once again an idiot.

 

[Cassandra]

If the Post Office gave the same rates as other companies they would probably stick with UPS or FedEx. The Post Office does not have the best reputation after all. By lowering their price they got work that they would not otherwise get and have a chance to prove that they can do the job. The Post Office has profited from this deal. Trump is once again an idiot.

You really believe he is an idiot, and in that perspective everything he does is idiotic.
But smart people understand that idiots do not become president of any country.

And I tell you Trump is far from an idiot and Trump is quite capable of convincing Amazon not to ditch the Post Office. Not while he is on watch. Because Trump is not about gay pride.

If Democrats had not been cheap hookers for these big corporations all the time,
they might have done it themselves.
In stead they seek excuses, would not work, can not do. We can only spread our legs.
Why not give Bernie a go? Sorry can not do, would not work. We can only bend over.

Wow you guys rock!

 

[Subduction Zone]

You really believe he is an idiot, and in that perspective everything he does is idiotic.
But smart people understand that idiots do not become president of any country.

Yes, I do. or else he is severely mentally ill. And there are many times that leaders of countries have made themselves look like idiots Sadly Trump does that almost every day.

And I tell you Trump is far from an idiot and Trump is quite capable of convincing Amazon not to ditch the Post Office. Not while he is on watch. Because Trump is not about gay pride.

What on Earth does gay pride have to do with this? And now that Amazon has used the Post Office for some time, and may be satisfied with the results that might happen. The point is, and you ignored it, is that without a lower price Amazon would probably have never given the Post Office a chance.

If Democrats had not been cheap hookers for these big corporations all the time,
they might have done it themselves.
In stead they seek excuses, would not work, can not do. We can only spread our legs.
Why not give Bernie a go? Sorry can not do, would not work. We can only bend over.

Wow you guys rock!

I was not pleased with the choice of Hillary at all either, though I think she would do a better job than Trump is doing right now. I was a lifelong Republican until the part began pandering to the extremeists out there. I would have voted for Bernie. If it was close in my state I would have voted for Hillary. As it was I had the luxury of voting third party to indicate my displeasure with both parties.

 

[idav]

What Trump is basically trying to do is make these multinationals pay a fair price for using national resources in stead of using their enormous weight to create uneven deals, basically exploiting every country they operate in. These big Companies like Google, Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, etc abuse their positions of power. Positions they should not even have in well regulated free market. Anyone believing in a free world not controlled by Multinationals should be happy about this. It brings more money in the local economy and less to the global elite. But as we have been seen consistently the Neoliberals/democrats are basically pushing the multi-nationalist agenda. That is why they want to flood countries with cheap labor behind the guise human interest. If they were so interested in human rights they force these multinationals to pay decent wages in other countries as well.

Because all they do is spread exploitation. Trump is right to make them produce in the US. It is still a great injustice as these multinationals avoid paying taxes in the markets where they make their sales. It is good to force these multinationals where they land to behave more social. It does not harm the low-wage countries either. Now national producers get a chance to take over production and export to richer countries, and that money earned benefits those country. Because multinationals steal from all countries.

Shame on you you democrats. You help no one, only create endless silly melodramatic sideshows about gay rights and that kind of stuff. Like homosexuals are the great victims of society. They generally live a hedonistic lifestyle, have more then average income, and have no kids to support. But these cry babies have been promoted to democratic proof of social interest.

Who do you want to fool? Politics is about fair distribution of income for people in the country, and multinationals should not even have the same benefits as national companies. They are the same exploitation rackets that set up the colonies and used slavery to make maximum profit. Of course they want politicians to talk about gays and abortion, that keeps intention away from the real issues, issues that concern them.

But Trump is trying to address the issues even if has limited leverage. And you can call him a moron as much as you like, you can call his supporters retards, but more and more Americans lost confidence that democrats will ever do anything for them. They had an excellent chance with Bernie Sanders to prove their sincerity, but in stead showed their real colors.

I will be more impressed when Trump attacks wal mart, oil companies and car companies. Why only attack tech/internet companies? Nobody likes the monopolies but Trump clearly shows his bias.

 

[Duke_Leto]

By rescinding my rights, and the rights of many others?

Which rights are he rescinding?

 

[Cassandra]

Yes, I do. or else he is severely mentally ill. And there are many times that leaders of countries have made themselves look like idiots Sadly Trump does that almost every day.

What on Earth does gay pride have to do with this? And now that Amazon has used the Post Office for some time, and may be satisfied with the results that might happen. The point is, and you ignored it, is that without a lower price Amazon would probably have never given the Post Office a chance.

I was not pleased with the choice of Hillary at all either, though I think she would do a better job than Trump is doing right now. I was a lifelong Republican until the part began pandering to the extremists out there. I would have voted for Bernie. If it was close in my state I would have voted for Hillary. As it was I had the luxury of voting third party to indicate my displeasure with both parties.

No that is not the point. The point is that Trump will force Amazon to pay decent prices and stop abusing their market position. For Trump the the low prices offer an opportunity to grab Amazon by their balls. Not only by making them behave less abusive, but exposing them. All the things the democrats could have done as well.

Even the Young Turks admitted that Trumps was actually doing stuff what Obama should have done and wondered why democrats never did this. And now democrats are trying to show how cool they are by foul-mouthing Trump? I am not impressed. Not only are they showing themselves impotent, they lost their moral high ground as well. People now see what they really are, concubines of Multinationals.

Who cares what you voted before. Trump is Trump, that is his strength. He did not sell out completely before he was even elected. Hillary would have simply continued the policy of Obama, she is on the same pay list. O yeah, Israel and Saudi Arabia do not like it that Russia helps Syria, so Hillary already started warmongering against Russia. Because if you are a hooker you spread your legs.

I do not even understand Democrats had the audacity to push Hillary. That may be legal but violates the intent of the constitution. First we have Bill and Hillary, then we have Hillary and Bill? Like We already had Bush sr, Bush jr. and now they were pushing Jeff? What is this "Dynasty"? Are these parties trying to get people used to the new royalty?

Okay, we did black, lets push a woman now. And what is next in store? Latino homo couple? As long as it distracts from the real issues and creates a lot of controversy and flame wars, that is what the multinational elite favors. Then democrats can fight their silly moral wars claiming to be humane by supporting the suppressed.

Democrats are fake. Trump is not by any standard a lovable, well behaved man. But he is real, and he is true in his love for his country. He is everything Hillary is not. Berny was a god-sent for the democrats, real, popular and at the right moment. But party elite wanted the glass doll, they had already paid for her. With Hillary war on Russia would already have started. And what the heck, they are pushing for that anyway. Now they are showing that they do not even care who is in the White House. Our agenda is to take on Russia, with or without the president. Because we the international elite rule.

I hope Trump gets reelected. The guy has guts.
And those calling people names? ....
Yeah they are brave too ... (in their own minds)

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Which rights are he rescinding?

Me, and a few others on this forum, specifically transgender rights. Such as the Dumbass-in-Chief thinking he is going to reverse the policy allowing transgender people to openly serve in the military via Twitter post.

 

[Cassandra]

I will be more impressed when Trump attacks wal mart, oil companies and car companies. Why only attack tech/internet companies? Nobody likes the monopolies but Trump clearly shows his bias.

You guys do not (want to) understand what Trump is doing. Of course he shows Bias and one should. You will always be ruled by money, but you favor money that is bound to your country and pays local taxes. Wallmart pays something like 32% in tax, (7 bln 2009). They can not escape that as their stores are bound to American soil.

American and European multinationals try to dodge the taxes on what they do elsewhere (and At home as well if they can). Like: Amazon UK boycott urged after retailer pays just £4.2m in tax
Trump is attacking that. By making Euopean multinationals pay in the US, Europe will make US multinationals pay in Europe, and finally we get rid of some of this staggering exploitation. read here: Multinationals grapple with Republican excise tax surprise

These are things Democrats might have done if Bernie Sanders would have been elected, but they opted for Hillary. Hillary would have done as much as Obama, which is nothing. Just fakism, look how great we are, we have a black president. Look how great we are, we have a female president. Like that solves the real problems.

Did you notice that in recent movies we now have far more multi-racial couples than found in actuality? Push, push, push. The elite wants the cultural and national identity of people destroyed. It is what the communists did too to create the universal worker. They mixed populations even made them minorities in their own land. The ideal working slaves should not have a national or regional allegiance. Otherwise they get national leaders like Trump who fight the international elite. Tell them that is racist. Destroying national identity is the agenda of multinationals everywhere by heralding the multiracial, multicultural, multi-religious society. At the same time they then use the tensions to make the groups hate each other to divide and weaken them. Divide and Rule.

Do you really think Soros helped starting the black lifes matter protests to create more harmony between the races? No, more hate. Tie it in with slavery, put a little more salt in the wounds. And when blacks who are only 14% of the population do more violent crimes against whites than the other way round, do you think that makes whites not more scared and furious? Of course it does. Create hate, keep them at each other throats, that the is the idea. Make it seem like interracial violence is a huge problem, even though all statistics show discrimination is at an all time low. Play the suckers.

What we need is people with a heart for the nation, for the people of the nation. People who cut the crap and start dealing in realities in stead of beliefs pushed by the media. If you think a global world order under the multinational elite is going to be paradise, I advise you to study the Soviet Union. Basically they kept people as stupid as possible to keep them docile.

 

[idav]

You guys do not (want to) understand what Trump is doing. Of course he shows Bias and one should. You will always be ruled by money, but you favor money that is bound to your country and pays local taxes. Wallmart pays something like 32% in tax, (7 bln 2009). They can not escape that as their stores are bound to American soil.

American and European multinationals try to dodge the taxes on what they do elsewhere (and At home as well if they can). Like: Amazon UK boycott urged after retailer pays just £4.2m in tax
Trump is attacking that. By making Euopean multinationals pay in the US, Europe will make US multinationals pay in Europe, and finally we get rid of some of this staggering exploitation. read here: Multinationals grapple with Republican excise tax surprise

These are things Democrats might have done if Bernie Sanders would have been elected, but they opted for Hillary. Hillary would have done as much as Obama, which is nothing. Just fakism, look how great we are, we have a black president. Look how great we are, we have a female president. Like that solves the real problems.

Did you notice that in recent movies we now have far more multi-racial couples than found in actuality? Push, push, push. The elite wants the cultural and national identity of people destroyed. It is what the communists did too to create the universal worker. They mixed populations even made them minorities in their own land. The ideal working slaves should not have a national or regional allegiance. Otherwise they get national leaders like Trump who fight the international elite. Tell them that is racist. Destroying national identity is the agenda of multinationals everywhere by heralding the multiracial, multicultural, multi-religious society. At the same time they then use the tensions to make the groups hate each other to divide and weaken them. Divide and Rule.

Do you really think Soros helped starting the black lifes matter protests to create more harmony between the races? No, more hate. Tie it in with slavery, put a little more salt in the wounds. And when blacks who are only 14% of the population do more violent crimes against whites than the other way round, do you think that makes whites not more scared and furious? Of course it does. Create hate, keep them at each other throats, that the is the idea. Make it seem like interracial violence is a huge problem, even though all statistics show discrimination is at an all time low. Play the suckers.

What we need is people with a heart for the nation, for the people of the nation. People who cut the crap and start dealing in realities in stead of beliefs pushed by the media. If you think a global world order under the multinational elite is going to be paradise, I advise you to study the Soviet Union. Basically they kept people as stupid as possible to keep them docile.

Wal Mart doesnt get a pass on being a multinational company and their revenue rivals Amazon. Have you heard of walmart.com? Wal Mart is number one in the world, amazon is 26. The biggest companies are oil companies like Exxon and car companies like VW who exploit the system, are multinational, and are part of the elitests you complain about.
List of largest companies by revenue - Wikipedia

Look into how much wal mart and other big companies take jobs from their home and send them to China. You want to complain about avoiding taxes? Lets look at costing jobs.
Walmart's imports from China cost 400,000 jobs, says study

Monopolies are a problem in general especially those who exploit and cheat thr systems. VW cheated the system and became one of the largest companies in the world.
How Volkswagen’s ‘Defeat Devices’ Worked

So I will ask again why only pick on internet companies, there is a much bigger problem that Trump is willing to exploit and have no issues with. And I have no idea what BLM has to do with any of those questions, I'm not a supporter of that group.

Your rant is amusing but avoids the hard look at who the real elitists are that you are complaining so passionately about.

 

[Cassandra]

Wal Mart doesnt get a pass on being a multinational company and their revenue rivals Amazon. Have you heard of walmart.com? Wal Mart is number one in the world, amazon is 26. The biggest companies are oil companies like Exxon and car companies like VW who exploit the system, are multinational, and are part of the elitests you complain about.
List of largest companies by revenue - Wikipedia

Look into how much wal mart and other big companies take jobs from their home and send them to China. You want to complain about avoiding taxes? Lets look at costing jobs.
Walmart's imports from China cost 400,000 jobs, says study

Monopolies are a problem in general especially those who exploit and cheat thr systems. VW cheated the system and became one of the largest companies in the world.
How Volkswagen’s ‘Defeat Devices’ Worked

So I will ask again why only pick on internet companies, there is a much bigger problem that Trump is willing to exploit and have no issues with. And I have no idea what BLM has to do with any of those questions, I'm not a supporter of that group.

Your rant is amusing but avoids the hard look at who the real elitists are that you are complaining so passionately about.

Yes all these big corporations monopolizing the market are wrong. But Trump is at least handling the issue. And Walmart is not the first company you want to take on. They still pay a lot of taxes and create a lot of local Jobs. But at some point you want to handle them too, I agree. But Trump did something even more important. Until now Washington helped multinationals with free trade treaties that guaranteed them unhindered access to countries all over the world. Under Obama they were pushing treaties that would allow multinationals to fine countries for hindering them, which is monstrous. Trump tore these treaties up, which is a huge step in breaking their power. He is actually doing something that counts.

I think it is a amazing Trump is still functioning now big money is burying him and his staff under constant media attacks and investigations blowing things way out of proportion to immobilize him. And frankly you guys here willingly or unwillingly are part of that.

But what you should have done is use that energy to get Bernie elected, not the Clinton dynasty. Because Clinton is a complete sell out to big capital, and the fact the she is the first women president is just a lure for people who think politics is the same as religion and all about moral issues. Moral issues only create endless, hopeless division and sidetrack from the real important issues. Bernie and Trump were the independent candidates. Bernie did not make it, Trump did. I was not a fan of Trump either, but I have come to respect him. Stop trying to make him fail, start trying to make him succeed.

You want to go after these double digit profit multinationals first. Take this whole netneutrality, it is a deceit. It is just allowing companies like Google, Facebook Netflix to make endusers pay most of the cost for the infrastructure. They make billions using the local infrastructure of countries for free while they create most of the traffic. Do not cal it netneutrality, call it a free ride for multinationals. What is next? Railneutrality? Sure multinationals no longer want to pay for transport by rail because it increases cost. No only passengers should pay for rail transport, no longer companies when mulitnationals use most of the capacity of rail. Make rail transport a neutral zero fee for companies.

It is a scam that only moves the costs towards the end users. More money for Google, Facebook, Netflix allowing them to take over other businesses and grow even bigger. Trump is no idiot. He says, let them pay to providers, and we tax those providers again. That way some money comes back. Because what people do not seem to understand is that to make these multinational giants pay taxes you need to somehow tie the earnings down to your country. Walmart is tied down in the US, that is why they pay a lot of tax. Providers have cables here, that is why they can be taxed. By forcing companies like Apple to produce in the US, you also tie them down here, and get more leverage over them. Trump is no idiot.

 

[Underhill]

From the article:

Why would Amazon pay the USPS what it pays UPS/Fed Ex when the USPS doesn't come into the picture until a package is received by them and sent out for delivery? And don't forget this little morsel from the article:

Oh. How nice, convenient, and lovely. He wants to launch an attack by citing a source that he doesn't actually cite.

According to everything I have read on the subject, the president is just plain wrong. The USPS makes money on the deal...

 

[Woberts]

Obama was a puppet put there by George Soros.

Citation?

And now democrats want war with Russia, because Putin stopped them from destroying Syria.

Would you care to cite this?

But Trump really does shows he cares about Americans.

You should probably cite this too.

 

[Shaul]

So why isn't Trump going after the person at the USPS who made the deal? Someone is attacking the wrong people.

What you fail to realize is that Amazon uses Fedex/UPS for shipping, the USPS only comes into the picture when the package arrives at your local distribution facility. So the USPS isn't even the #1 shipper or bearing the #1 cost.

Methinks a little Walton birdy spoke with the president to tear into Amazon. It's all about profits at that level.

This is factual incorrect. Amazon does use the USPS as its primary delivery quite often. The USPS even has employees come on Sundays exclusively to handle Amazon deliveries. Also the deliveries that Amazon uses the USPS for are the ones that are most expensive to do, particularly rural deliveries. An independent analysis found that the USPS negotiated Amazon rates are a loser for the USPS. Ask Postal employees what they think of Amazon, you will get an earful.

Trump gets many things wrong. This isn’t one of them.

In 2017, long before Trump was talking about the USPS Amazon relationship, Fortune magazine published this article, Analyst Claims the U.S. Postal Service Is Giving Amazon a Huge Subsidy

 

[Shaul]

According to everything I have read on the subject, the president is just plain wrong. The USPS makes money on the deal...

Then read this,

Analyst Claims the U.S. Postal Service Is Giving Amazon a Huge Subsidy

 

[Underhill]

Then read this,

Analyst Claims the U.S. Postal Service Is Giving Amazon a Huge Subsidy

Okay but that is talking about a general subsidy on all shipping (That disproportionately benefits online retailers but not Amazon specifically). The deal the USPS has with Amazon (last mile shipping) is the same deal they make with Ebay and other large shippers. It actually saves Fed Ex and UPS money and cost the USPS very little as they are already traveling these routes daily.

 

[Shaul]

Yeah, and? Isn't the free market what Conservatives are all about? Is it any different when a company shifts their own tax burden onto the costumer? Or now is it fine for us all to attack a free market and a free market-based contract because Trump complained about it? Last I knew, many on the Right were wanting the USPS to rely more on private funds anyways.

You are really missing the point. The USPS Amazon deal is not the free market. It is an artificially contrived market.

 

[Underhill]

Yes all these big corporations monopolizing the market are wrong. But Trump is at least handling the issue. And Walmart is not the first company you want to take on. They still pay a lot of taxes and create a lot of local Jobs. But at some point you want to handle them too, I agree. But Trump did something even more important. Until now Washington helped multinationals with free trade treaties that guaranteed them unhindered access to countries all over the world. Under Obama they were pushing treaties that would allow multinationals to fine countries for hindering them, which is monstrous. Trump tore these treaties up, which is a huge step in breaking their power. He is actually doing something that counts.

I think it is a amazing Trump is still functioning now big money is burying him and his staff under constant media attacks and investigations blowing things way out of proportion to immobilize him. And frankly you guys here willingly or unwillingly are part of that.

But what you should have done is use that energy to get Bernie elected, not the Clinton dynasty. Because Clinton is a complete sell out to big capital, and the fact the she is the first women president is just a lure for people who think politics is the same as religion and all about moral issues. Moral issues only create endless, hopeless division and sidetrack from the real important issues. Bernie and Trump were the independent candidates. Bernie did not make it, Trump did. I was not a fan of Trump either, but I have come to respect him. Stop trying to make him fail, start trying to make him succeed.

You want to go after these double digit profit multinationals first. Take this whole netneutrality, it is a deceit. It is just allowing companies like Google, Facebook Netflix to make endusers pay most of the cost for the infrastructure. They make billions using the local infrastructure of countries for free while they create most of the traffic. Do not cal it netneutrality, call it a free ride for multinationals. What is next? Railneutrality? Sure multinationals no longer want to pay for transport by rail because it increases cost. No only passengers should pay for rail transport, no longer companies when mulitnationals use most of the capacity of rail. Make rail transport a neutral zero fee for companies.

It is a scam that only moves the costs towards the end users. More money for Google, Facebook, Netflix allowing them to take over other businesses and grow even bigger. Trump is no idiot. He says, let them pay to providers, and we tax those providers again. That way some money comes back. Because what people do not seem to understand is that to make these multinational giants pay taxes you need to somehow tie the earnings down to your country. Walmart is tied down in the US, that is why they pay a lot of tax. Providers have cables here, that is why they can be taxed. By forcing companies like Apple to produce in the US, you also tie them down here, and get more leverage over them. Trump is no idiot.

Trump is an idiot, but you raise some interesting, if sometimes misguided, points.

The problem is that the cable providers have done a terrible job servicing their customers. They are over priced, short on services (or had been prior to Netflix and others) and offer terrible customer support. They have milked customers for decades and are angry, not because they won't make money, but because their unrestricted monopoly in most markets isn't as lucrative as it once was. Cry me a river. They still make massive profits on cable internet, which they continually raise the prices on. So eventually they will be more internet provider and less TV subscription service. I am okay with that.

As for cost for infrastructure... I would point out a simple fact. Comcast, Verizon, Spectrum and others do not pay that cost. We do as customers. The carriers have made massive amounts of cash off that infrastructure we have paid for many times over.

 

[Shaul]

Okay but that is talking about a general subsidy on all shipping (That disproportionately benefits online retailers but not Amazon specifically). The deal the USPS has with Amazon (last mile shipping) is the same deal they make with Ebay and other large shippers. It actually saves Fed Ex and UPS money and cost the USPS very little as they are already traveling these routes daily.

Re-read the article. Package deliveries have exploded for the USPS. For example Rural Carriers (which mostly use their own cars) now routinely have so many packages to deliver that management is pressuring them to (on the employee’s expense) to get bigger vehicles! They have so many packages that they can’t even fit them all into their cars, Jeeps, or trucks. But the employees are still getting the same pay and expected to complete all these deliveries within the same amount of time. IOW a five fold (or more) increase in packages for no more capacity. Also the USPS has a special deal with Amazon for Sunday delivery. The USPS delivers Amazon Prime packages in Sundays. USPS employees come into work on Sundays to deliver Amazon packages and nothing else, no other retailers and no USPS mail. Also this creates the situation where many Postal workers no longer have any days off in the week. Especially during the holidays Postal employees can go for weeks without a day off.

 

[Shaul]

Me, and a few others on this forum, specifically transgender rights. Such as the Dumbass-in-Chief thinking he is going to reverse the policy allowing transgender people to openly serve in the military via Twitter post.

Serving in the military is a right?

 

[Subduction Zone]

This is factual incorrect. Amazon does use the USPS as its primary delivery quite often. The USPS even has employees come on Sundays exclusively to handle Amazon deliveries. Also the deliveries that Amazon uses the USPS for are the ones that are most expensive to do, particularly rural deliveries. An independent analysis found that the USPS negotiated Amazon rates are a loser for the USPS. Ask Postal employees what they think of Amazon, you will get an earful.

Trump gets many things wrong. This isn’t one of them.

In 2017, long before Trump was talking about the USPS Amazon relationship, Fortune magazine published this article, Analyst Claims the U.S. Postal Service Is Giving Amazon a Huge Subsidy

Yet your own article points out how the "analyst" got things wrong and has a vested interest against Amazon:

"But Sandbulte’s investment firm holds FedEx stock, meaning he has a direct interest in critiquing the USPS, and his analysis is debatable on several points. He disingenuously describes the pricing situation as “a gift card from Uncle Sam,” which implies there’s tax money involved. But the USPS doesn’t receive tax revenues."