I addressed that....it can be made cost neutral to the poor.I think someone else here alluded to this. The poor is very susceptible to these taxes. They won't be able to choose in what was supposed to be a free market.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I addressed that....it can be made cost neutral to the poor.I think someone else here alluded to this. The poor is very susceptible to these taxes. They won't be able to choose in what was supposed to be a free market.
Yes, buying habits change with fuel prices.Do you think so? I see a lot of hybrids and they seem to be growing in numbers in northern VA.
Naw, the "real" men and women drive trucks.Do you think so? I see a lot of hybrids and they seem to be growing in numbers in northern VA.
But they aren't.If the tax they pay at the pump is offset by a reduction in other taxes, it's a wash.
If the tax they pay at the pump is offset by a reduction in other taxes, it's a wash.
Note also that poor people in urban areas endure the worst air quality, & would
benefit from less exhaust in the air.
That's a good point. Makes me sad because I typically prefer those to full cabs.Have you noticed that trucks with standard cabs are becoming rarer?
My proposal isn't based upon Republicans' policies.But they aren't.
Republicans are all about raising taxes. Just not on the rich folks who send jobs overseas and hire all the illegal immigrants.
They claim that taxing the rich will cost jobs, despite all the evidence to the contrary. Like when Bush cut taxes on high incomes and the country wound up in a huge recession.
The evidence is there.
Tom
But it isn't.I addressed that....it can be made cost neutral to the poor.
Their payroll taxes are significant, & could be reduced or eliminated.Being poor, I wouldn't expect they pay much tax otherwise. Where would you reduce their tax burden?
The more people (rich or poor) who use less fuel the better.So then you agree? The more poor folks we keep off the road, the better for them as well as the rest of us.
Don't they get most of that kicked back to them during tax return season?Their payroll taxes are significant, & could be reduced or eliminated.
I've never been a fan of those anyway.
For snowplowing, they're far superior.That's a good point. Makes me sad because I typically prefer those to full cabs.
I'm not proposing a property tax increase.But it isn't.
Republicans regularly raise taxes, here in Indiana.
They tripled the property taxes on rental property, effectively tripling the tax on the people who can't afford to buy. How is that not a "job killing tax hike"?
Tom
Not payroll taxes.Don't they get most of that kicked back to them during tax return season?
You keep saying this.My proposal isn't based upon Republicans' policies.
And the reason for the recession was 9/11, not the tax cuts (which occurred after the economy began to crash).
Drat. I think I was referring to income tax.Not payroll taxes.
Those are down the drain.....unless you make it to 62, & start slopping at that trough (like me).
Then you get some back, even though you continue to pay them.
You keep derailing the thread to make it about your dislike for Republicans.You keep saying this.
You're in the picture framing business?But I know differently, because my business is very real estate dependent. The real estate market was booming between the Republican tax cuts and the Republican Recession. I know this because I was there. The custom picture framing industry and the art business were blazing, at the time.
You just don't know what you're talking about, and I know this.
Tom
A big part of the problem here is people saying things that are demonstrably false.Drat. I think I was referring to income tax.
Yes, actually I do.You don't know jack.
You're in the picture framing business?
Then you're misreadingA big part of the problem here is people saying things that are demonstrably false.
Cutting income taxes, while cranking up the other taxes, is not "cutting taxes". It is shifting the tax burden.
Here you go again.Which is something that Republicans seem very good at, at least by my experience in Indiana. Republicans raise taxes every chance they get. They just don't call it a tax increase. They talk about fiscal prudence. Cut taxes on the rich, raise taxes on the less rich, and pretend that they are "about the people".
Tom
I addressed that....it can be made cost neutral to the poor.