Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
He's just a symptom.Hinchcliffe is a comedian. He's not the problem.
Jon Stewart Says Tony Hinchcliffe Wasn’t the Problem With Trump’s “Apocalyptic” MSG Rally
While having an insult comic roast a key voting demographic was “probably not the best decision,” Stewart says focus should be kept on Trump’s rhetoric ahead of the election.www.vanityfair.com
Check out some of the late nite TV clips from the rally, the questionable comedy? was hardly limited to the opening.
I've seen a lot of comedy in my day (my husband is a stand-up comedian). I've been to tons and tons of shows.
A roast involves a party that has agreed to be roasted ahead of time. Otherwise, it's just being mean for the sake of being mean.
Wow, the Hitler comparison is quite the stretch of the imagination.Right you are yet Kamala is just a newbie when it comes to her proposed gun confiscation program for registered gun owners.
Disarming those you seek to have dictatorial control over is tried and true tactic of those sharing the Anti-Semitic mindset
The financial aspect a new twist Kamala's likeminded Anti-Semitic forerunners of her and the democrat Anti-Semites currently taking over college campuses and streets and calling for "River to the Sea" solution for the Jews never thought of .
She does try to be innovative in the tactic I must admit .
Kamala for Gun Confiscation: In Her Own Words
Monday, September 16, 2024
Harris supports gun confiscation. Harris has repeatedly expressed support for a mandatory gun “buyback” program where Americans would be forced to turn over their firearms to the government for a set price – in other words: gun confiscation.
Here is Harris supporting gun confiscation, in her own words:
(Sahil Kapur, Kamala Harris Supports Mandatory Buyback of Assault Weapons, Bloomberg, September 6, 2019)
- At a September 2019 campaign event, Harris told reporters that confiscating commonly-owned semi-automatic firearms was “a good idea.” Elaborating on her support for a compulsory “buyback” program, Harris added, “We have to work out the details -- there are a lot of details -- but I do…We have to take those guns off the streets.”
The candidate responded, “I do believe that we need to do buybacks.” Making clear that she believes Americans’ Second Amendment rights are for sale, Harris added “A buyback program is a good idea. Now we need to do it the right way. And part of that has to be, you know, buy back and give people their value, the financial value.”
- On the September 16, 2019 episode of “The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon,” Harris reiterated her support for gun confiscation. During a question-and-answer session, an audience member asked Harris “Do you believe in the mandatory buyback of quote-unquote assault weapons and whether or not you do, how does that idea not go against fundamentally the Second Amendment?”
(The Tonight Show
PUBLISHED PAPER
Nazi Repression of Firearms Owners
August 1, 1999
By Stephen P. Halbrook
Also published in The American Rifleman
New research on the Nazi confiscation of registered guns—and execution of gun owners—provides a poignant lesson on why Americans have always opposed the registration of peaceable firearms owners.
The Night of the Broken Glass (Kristallnacht)—the infamous Nazi rampage against Germany’s Jews—took place in November 1938. It was preceded by the confiscation of firearms from the Jewish victims. On Nov. 8, The New York Times reported from Berlin, “Berlin Police Head Announces ‘Disarming’ of Jews,” explaining:
“The Berlin Police President, Count Wolf Heinrich von Helldorf, announced that as a result of a police activity in the last few weeks the entire Jewish population of Berlin had been ‘disarmed’ with the confiscation of 2,569 hand weapons, 1,702 firearms and 20,000 rounds of ammunition. Any Jews still found in possession of weapons without valid licenses are threatened with the severest punishment.”[2]
On the evening of Nov. 9, Adolf Hitler, Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels and other Nazi chiefs planned the attack. Orders went out to Nazi security forces: “All Jewish stores are to be destroyed immediately. Jewish synagogues are to be set on fire . The Führer wishes that the police does not intervene. All Jews are to be disarmed. In the event of resistance they are to be shot immediately.”[3]
All hell broke loose on Nov. 10: “Nazis Smash, Loot and Burn Jewish Shops and Temples,” a headline read. “One of the first legal measures issued was an order by Heinrich Himmler, commander of all German police, forbidding Jews to possess any weapons whatever and imposing a penalty of twenty years confinement in a concentration camp upon every Jew found in possession of a weapon hereafter.”[4] Thousands of Jews were taken away.
www.newsweek.com
Right you are yet Kamala is just a newbie when it comes to her proposed gun confiscation program for registered gun owners.
Kamala says the Jews are guilty of committing genocide.
So, you're just gonna post the exact same thing I already responded to again?Right you are yet Kamala is just a newbie when it comes to her proposed gun confiscation program for registered gun owners.
Disarming those you seek to have dictatorial control over is tried and true tactic of those sharing the Anti-Semitic mindset
The financial aspect a new twist Kamala's likeminded Anti-Semitic forerunners of her and the democrat Anti-Semites currently taking over college campuses and streets and calling for "River to the Sea" solution for the Jews never thought of .
She does try to be innovative in the tactic I must admit .
Kamala for Gun Confiscation: In Her Own Words
Monday, September 16, 2024
Harris supports gun confiscation. Harris has repeatedly expressed support for a mandatory gun “buyback” program where Americans would be forced to turn over their firearms to the government for a set price – in other words: gun confiscation.
Here is Harris supporting gun confiscation, in her own words:
(Sahil Kapur, Kamala Harris Supports Mandatory Buyback of Assault Weapons, Bloomberg, September 6, 2019)
- At a September 2019 campaign event, Harris told reporters that confiscating commonly-owned semi-automatic firearms was “a good idea.” Elaborating on her support for a compulsory “buyback” program, Harris added, “We have to work out the details -- there are a lot of details -- but I do…We have to take those guns off the streets.”
The candidate responded, “I do believe that we need to do buybacks.” Making clear that she believes Americans’ Second Amendment rights are for sale, Harris added “A buyback program is a good idea. Now we need to do it the right way. And part of that has to be, you know, buy back and give people their value, the financial value.”
- On the September 16, 2019 episode of “The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon,” Harris reiterated her support for gun confiscation. During a question-and-answer session, an audience member asked Harris “Do you believe in the mandatory buyback of quote-unquote assault weapons and whether or not you do, how does that idea not go against fundamentally the Second Amendment?”
(The Tonight Show
PUBLISHED PAPER
Nazi Repression of Firearms Owners
August 1, 1999
By Stephen P. Halbrook
Also published in The American Rifleman
New research on the Nazi confiscation of registered guns—and execution of gun owners—provides a poignant lesson on why Americans have always opposed the registration of peaceable firearms owners.
The Night of the Broken Glass (Kristallnacht)—the infamous Nazi rampage against Germany’s Jews—took place in November 1938. It was preceded by the confiscation of firearms from the Jewish victims. On Nov. 8, The New York Times reported from Berlin, “Berlin Police Head Announces ‘Disarming’ of Jews,” explaining:
“The Berlin Police President, Count Wolf Heinrich von Helldorf, announced that as a result of a police activity in the last few weeks the entire Jewish population of Berlin had been ‘disarmed’ with the confiscation of 2,569 hand weapons, 1,702 firearms and 20,000 rounds of ammunition. Any Jews still found in possession of weapons without valid licenses are threatened with the severest punishment.”[2]
On the evening of Nov. 9, Adolf Hitler, Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels and other Nazi chiefs planned the attack. Orders went out to Nazi security forces: “All Jewish stores are to be destroyed immediately. Jewish synagogues are to be set on fire . The Führer wishes that the police does not intervene. All Jews are to be disarmed. In the event of resistance they are to be shot immediately.”[3]
All hell broke loose on Nov. 10: “Nazis Smash, Loot and Burn Jewish Shops and Temples,” a headline read. “One of the first legal measures issued was an order by Heinrich Himmler, commander of all German police, forbidding Jews to possess any weapons whatever and imposing a penalty of twenty years confinement in a concentration camp upon every Jew found in possession of a weapon hereafter.”[4] Thousands of Jews were taken away.
Not "the Jews." Benjamin Netanyahu seems to be going too far though.
Where's the quote from Kamala? Let's see it.
This link takes me to a landing page on whatever haaretz.com is.
"It's real" is a far cry from "The Jews are guilty of committing genocide."
"It's real" is what she shouted to one of her fans saying that Israel is guilty of Genocide.
As to the first part of your hysteria, Harris's gun control laws are for the whole population, not the Jews specifically in my view.Right you are yet Kamala is just a newbie when it comes to her proposed gun confiscation program for registered gun owners.
Disarming those you seek to have dictatorial control over is tried and true tactic of those sharing the Anti-Semitic mindset
The financial aspect a new twist Kamala's likeminded Anti-Semitic forerunners of her and the democrat Anti-Semites currently taking over college campuses and streets and calling for "River to the Sea" solution for the Jews never thought of .
She does try to be innovative in the tactic I must admit .
Kamala for Gun Confiscation: In Her Own Words
Monday, September 16, 2024
Harris supports gun confiscation. Harris has repeatedly expressed support for a mandatory gun “buyback” program where Americans would be forced to turn over their firearms to the government for a set price – in other words: gun confiscation.
Here is Harris supporting gun confiscation, in her own words:
(Sahil Kapur, Kamala Harris Supports Mandatory Buyback of Assault Weapons, Bloomberg, September 6, 2019)
- At a September 2019 campaign event, Harris told reporters that confiscating commonly-owned semi-automatic firearms was “a good idea.” Elaborating on her support for a compulsory “buyback” program, Harris added, “We have to work out the details -- there are a lot of details -- but I do…We have to take those guns off the streets.”
The candidate responded, “I do believe that we need to do buybacks.” Making clear that she believes Americans’ Second Amendment rights are for sale, Harris added “A buyback program is a good idea. Now we need to do it the right way. And part of that has to be, you know, buy back and give people their value, the financial value.”
- On the September 16, 2019 episode of “The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon,” Harris reiterated her support for gun confiscation. During a question-and-answer session, an audience member asked Harris “Do you believe in the mandatory buyback of quote-unquote assault weapons and whether or not you do, how does that idea not go against fundamentally the Second Amendment?”
(The Tonight Show
PUBLISHED PAPER
Nazi Repression of Firearms Owners
August 1, 1999
By Stephen P. Halbrook
Also published in The American Rifleman
New research on the Nazi confiscation of registered guns—and execution of gun owners—provides a poignant lesson on why Americans have always opposed the registration of peaceable firearms owners.
The Night of the Broken Glass (Kristallnacht)—the infamous Nazi rampage against Germany’s Jews—took place in November 1938. It was preceded by the confiscation of firearms from the Jewish victims. On Nov. 8, The New York Times reported from Berlin, “Berlin Police Head Announces ‘Disarming’ of Jews,” explaining:
“The Berlin Police President, Count Wolf Heinrich von Helldorf, announced that as a result of a police activity in the last few weeks the entire Jewish population of Berlin had been ‘disarmed’ with the confiscation of 2,569 hand weapons, 1,702 firearms and 20,000 rounds of ammunition. Any Jews still found in possession of weapons without valid licenses are threatened with the severest punishment.”[2]
On the evening of Nov. 9, Adolf Hitler, Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels and other Nazi chiefs planned the attack. Orders went out to Nazi security forces: “All Jewish stores are to be destroyed immediately. Jewish synagogues are to be set on fire . The Führer wishes that the police does not intervene. All Jews are to be disarmed. In the event of resistance they are to be shot immediately.”[3]
All hell broke loose on Nov. 10: “Nazis Smash, Loot and Burn Jewish Shops and Temples,” a headline read. “One of the first legal measures issued was an order by Heinrich Himmler, commander of all German police, forbidding Jews to possess any weapons whatever and imposing a penalty of twenty years confinement in a concentration camp upon every Jew found in possession of a weapon hereafter.”[4] Thousands of Jews were taken away.
Kamala says the Jews are guilty of committing genocide.
This is classic Hitler style demonization of an entire race.
You only use language like that condemning an entire race of people when you are laying the groundwork to justify what you intend to do , or in the case of Kamala and her Anti_-Semitic Squad NOT TO DO, something , once elected.
Haaretz | U.S. News
'It's Real': How Two Words by Kamala Harris Set Off a Firestorm About Genocide in Gaza
What did Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris mean when she responded to a pro-Palestinian protester's use of the word genocide during a rally in Wisconsin on Saturday?
Hitler said the same about the Jews.
Birds of a feather.
Mandatory gun confiscation is what she said , oh and she'll give you the choice of a few dollars to comply or jail if you don't
Here is what she did not say, *mandatory gun confiscation for the Jews only* you'll find the ability of the general populace to harrass Jews without their own assault rifles to be difficult. Sounds fair to me.
In my view its not even worth discussing this till you can find a source, except to note you can't tell the difference between the entire race of Jews and Israel.
Still doesn't match your claim.
It really is difficult to grasp how the dark motivations behind this sort of behavior manage to so fully overpower some people's common sense.
This is weird side note, but when I lived in Chicago I had occasion to be in and around many of the predominately Hispanic neighborhoods and I eventually did learn how to more or less accurately differentiate between Puerto Rican and Mexican Americans. They do have different set of physical features that are common within each group (not always, though). And they also do have very different personality traits common within each group. Of the two, I did not much like the Puerto Ricans because they were incredibly arrogant and rude, and would get aggressive (the males in particular) at the drop of a hat. Whereas I really liked the Mexicans I met because they were easy going, fun-loving, hard-working, and just generally friendly people. (The same goes for the many Polish Americans I met.) Also, Pierto Ricans tended to have narrower facial features and more almond-shaped eyes. Whereas the Mexicans tended to have rounder facial shapes and rounder eyes.
So what does the Jewish L.A. Times owner's Daughter publicly rebuking the Democrat Front runner 7 days before national election tell you ?
Only time I worked with anyone of Latin descent, in Indiana, was when I worked at a food processing plant. Otherwise it's very white there, especially the rural parts.
Nope.
Oh ok, I think I understand what you're saying - something that took place in a CNN studio was a highly organized event, where Trump's campaign happened. Madison Square Garden is in the same CNN studio - behind the background wall, I guess. It's guilt by association, but the association is only with the guy who said that to Hasan and somehow not with Hasan himself or the rest of the CNN News Night panel at this highly organized event.
Why is it very negative?
Hinchcliffe is a comedian. He's not the problem.
Jon Stewart Says Tony Hinchcliffe Wasn’t the Problem With Trump’s “Apocalyptic” MSG Rally
While having an insult comic roast a key voting demographic was “probably not the best decision,” Stewart says focus should be kept on Trump’s rhetoric ahead of the election.