• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump nominates pseudo-science promoter Dr. Oz

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
And is not an excuse for discrimination against people who have never committed a crime.

Oh good grief. Use some common sense. What are we going to do? Do a criminal background check on every trans person who is obvious., or deny entrance to all trans people who are obviously trans. Like I said, maybe I have used the women's lavatory with transsexual people. I don't know since only between .05 and 1.6 percent of Americans identify as either trans or non-binary. Anyway, enough about me. I do know that a strange person came into the staffing company I worked for for many years, and we couldn't tell if it was a man or a woman (and his/her name was SHANNON which didn't help much if at all) and he/she refused to say, and this person qualified for a job but never showed up for the interview. I found the entire thing to be weird. But I wouldn't have batted an eye if that person had gone to the bathroom and that was it with me. I would have definitely batted an eye if he or she had come on to me in some way though. I also would have batted an eye if I was straigntening my slip or whatever and this person made it clear that he or she was a man.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
Oh good grief. Use some common sense. What are we going to do? Do a criminal background check on every trans person who is obvious., or deny entrance to all trans people who are obviously trans.
No, we are not going to do a background check on anyone just so they can pee, and we are not going to deny anyone access to a public bathroom unless they do something illegal.

Like you said, common sense.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
What I imagine resulting from the Maga obsession
with women's bathrooms is....
- Laws with severe sanctions against entering a publicly
accessible lavatory or locker room when the posted
sex doesn't match the entrant's birth certificate sex.
- There won't be guards at the doors. On a complaint
basis, cops will arrest the suspected transwoman to
investigate & prosecute. Perhaps a little "tune up"
with tasers & cudgels soften "him" up first.
Yeah, it does complicate the possibility of any touring outside the state of California if my ultra-niche music is accepted by it's narrow target audience (who is primarily MidWest)
 
Last edited:

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Because there was nothing to address to begin with.
Yeah. There was. There's often undue fear from a majority when it comes to letting a minority equally access and share society.
Also it's mostly men who are against this while its mostly women who support it. So there is definitely an element of being offended on someone elses behalf and insisting you must protect that group when they don't want it.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Doesn't this make a case for using a single occupancy bathroom?


Excerpted from your link to The Christian Post.
The conservative Family Research Council has compiled a list of 21 incidents of men assaulting or violating women's privacy in public bathrooms, warning that despite what activists claim, transgender-friendly policies do increase the risk of such crimes.
:
With that in mind, FRC compiled a list of 21 cases reported in the U.S. stretching back to 1999, but most within the last 10 years, where men violated the privacy of women in bathrooms, locker rooms, and other private spaces.
It's safe to assume that The Christian Post, & The
"conservative" Family Research Council would've
diligently compiled their list of such incidents.
So I'll accept their statistics.
The result is about 1 per year in a population
(USA) of 335,000,000.....a very low frequency.

This raises an extremely important issue...
Is the solution to the problem worse than the
problem itself?
A solution would necessarily involve several
things, eg, vetting (eg, birth certificate, genetic
test, blood test, physical exam), surveillance,
police, prosecution, & punishment.
Potential risks / costs....
Butch women harassed, arrested, jailed, &
investigated. Trans women going to prison
for relieving themselves (no assault).
The whole justice system devoting resources
to cause more harm than good.
 
Last edited:

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
Excerpted from your link to The Christian Post.

It's safe to assume that The Christian Post, & The
"conservative" Family Research Council would've
diligently compiled their list of such incidents.
So I'll accept their statistics.
The result is about 1 per year in a population
(USA) of 335,000,000.....a very low frequency.

This raises an extremely important issue...
Is the solution to the problem worse than the
problem itself? A solution would necessarily
involve several things...
Some kind of vetting (eg, birth certificate,
genetic test, blood test, physical exam), some
kind of surveillance, police, prosecution, &
punishment.
Potential risks / costs....
Butch women harassed, arrested, jailed, &
investigated, trans women going to prison
for relieving themselves (no assault), the
whole justice system devoting resources
to cause more harm than good.
My entire point of my post was to counter the claim that it does not happen and women are concerned.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
My entire point of my post was to counter the claim that it does not happen and women are concerned.
Do you find the frequency of it happening to be
a concern justifying creation of a policy to prevent
trans women from using women's lavatories?
How do you envision it being enforced?
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
Do you find the frequency of it happening to be
a concern justifying creation of a policy to prevent
trans women from using women's lavatories?
How do you envision it being enforced?
I think to alleviate women's concerns the use of single occupancy bathrooms is the right answer. As far as how to enforce it, call the police just like if a nontrans man came into the bathroom. Not sure what more you can do.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I think to alleviate women's concerns the use of single occupancy bathrooms is the right answer. As far as how to enforce it, call the police just like if a nontrans man came into the bathroom. Not sure what more you can do.
Single occupancy lavs are spendier,
especially if retro-fitted. Expect that
shared usage will largely continue.
 
Top