Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I've been under the impression that it was just used for presentation purposes.This video is new, it might not be on for long.
But the guy, Lt. General Tom McInerney, speaks to why Pelosi is anxious to get Trump out.
He said she was "frantic" that her laptop was removed, that's why she's so frantic, at around 10 minutes in.
Tough to listen with the background music.
Yeah. It cannot possibly be frantic, scared, anger, and other such emotions were common for politicians, staff, journalists amd others who were on the receiving end of an insurrection, and that the very core of our society was assaulted and violated.He said she was "frantic" that her laptop was removed, that's why she's so frantic, at around 10 minutes in.
Well at least that will keep Trump on the phone for awhile and out of trouble for the duration.
But as reprehensible as the actions of Donald Trump are, the rampant use of the internet to foment violence and hate, and reinforce white supremacy is about more than any one personality.
Commit to meaningful transparency of platform algorithms so we know how and what content is being amplified, to whom, and the associated impact.
I've been under the impression that it was just used for presentation purposes.
Even Pence is showing he's furious over it, and I've never known him to display anger like that.
I commend you for having the integrity to admit it. Respectfully, I suggest you try googling these things. I was immediately suspicious of your video and it took me about 10 seconds to find a fact checking website on it.I guess I can't believe everything I get from my far right sources.
They are delusional just like Trump is. They are trying to reinterpret reality to fit their delusions.They are looking at the language of his speech, claiming that he did not actually concede.
You found this on some random website that admits it’s from an “unknown source”.This is a video, actually an audio file, of a phone conversation.
The first 10 minutes is the most controversial.
EXPLOSIVE: OBAMA AND RENZI FORMER PM OF ITALY ORCHESTRATED THE THEFT OF U.S. ELECTIONS
(From an unknown source)
Are you saying Pence was furious over Pelosi losing her laptop?
1. Do you believe everything you find on the internet?
2. If you believed this, but it was actually BS like some of the other content you now admit was BS, how would you know?
You wouldn’t know, you would just go on believing it, wouldn’t you?
Thank you.No, I don't believe all the content that I encounter here on the net.
You sound confident in your own powers of distinguishing truth from fiction. Yet, the Pelosi smear video is the only thing I checked, which can be checked, at this point. And if I hadn’t checked it, you would remain blissfully unaware that it was BS.I'm smart.
I would figure it out in a timely fashion.
And only the Pelosi smear video is BS for sure at this point.
Many, many people take the time to write many, many absurd conspiracy theories on the internet. And this has been happening long before the internet. Here is a sampler: The Skeptic's DictionaryI'm not CONVINCED that it's true, I actually find it dubious in authenticity.
But I find it interesting.
Who would take the time to write it?
Your assessment of the credibility of this letter - or essay, or whatever it is - appears to rest heavily on your gut feelings about how true it seems. That is a very good way to get suckered into nonsense and conspiracy theories.And little things, like he mentions: "the emergency broadcast system to be activated. The FCC just recently released a memorandum speaking to the requirements under Federal law to send messages from the president to the public.
...
Needless to say, if my cell trips off with an emegency broadcast in the coming days, I'll probably take a stroke.
Dave, see what I mean here? The author is pretending to have perfect knowledge of the future. That’s a red flag. No journalist, no matter how much information they have, can know the future. No world leader, not even Donald Trump, can know the future. Real experts and people with real knowledge don’t pretend to have such perfect, prophetic powers. Conspiracy theorists do that, in order to get attention.Let me be clear: Trump will be president for another four years. Biden will not be president. Yes, I know those are shocking words in these crazy days.
Let’s think about this magical, prophetic prediction for a second. Is there any scenario in which this claim can be proved wrong? Even if Biden is inaugurated, Trump has already said he won’t attend. It’s quite possible Trump will stage his own, parallel inauguration no matter what happens, consistent with his effort to take every possible avenue to overturn the election. One does not need any special knowledge to make this prediction and it is almost impossible to prove wrong. That’s another red flag for conspiracy theory nonsense.Expect Trump to be inaugurated on Jan 20th!
Why is that important? Trump has an enormous ego and it has been extremely difficult for him to admit he lost. It is hardly surprising that even after the violence of January 6, even when trying to restore calm, he could not bring himself to say the name “Biden”. It is very common in politics to speak about your opponents without identifying them by name. Many politicians do that. This doesn’t mean anything.I have been approached by many saying, “It’s over…” and “Trump conceded the election…”. Nothing of the sort has taken place. Go back and listen to the videos all the way through. At no point does Trump even mention Biden’s name. At no point does he say he concedes. He does say that there will be a peaceful transition to a new administration and he does say that this is only the beginning. Those phrases are important to note.