• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump Shares Post: You are either a patriot or a traitor

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
Trump getting shot wasn't funny.

But this, this is funny! Who ever made that up did a good job with the wording lol


View attachment 94631


Of course its fake but its still funny

1721825378651.png

"Hey, don't I get some of the credit"
 

LeftyLen

Active Member
We know which side MAGA thinks they fall on. I guess that makes the rest of us traitors according to Trump and his Band of Deplorables.

When driving as a long haul driver listening to the radio or with my online time I make a point of reading and listening to those I disagree with. I listen to both the extremes and moderates to simply acquire an understanding of others, no matter how annoying or even repulsive their positions. There are online those on the far left and far right and everything in between who have plenty to say, each acting like their personal perspectives are singularly the most important perspectives ever uttered that must be heard. I have noted copious comments of those who loath country music stating they envision country music aficionados as deplorable hayseeds. The left relegate rural citizens as deplorables occupying small towns, villages, hamlets. The left as I have assessed see, “agrarian overall wearing yahoos populating those towns, dirty red necked Provencal proletarian hayseeds who are probably in league with the klan -hardly worth the carbon intake their existence entails.” This revulsion I noted in reviews of country music by urban leftists who disdain the working class, particularly the rural variety. Paradoxically the left loath the working class while at the same time harp on the ‘class struggle’ of marginalized workers and other marginalized ‘identity’ groups. The left’s proclaimed egalitarian posture betrayed by their overt condescending view of the working class. This curious dichotomy a perplexing contradiction I have noted about leftists for years, an affirmation of caring about the ‘oppressed’ while simultaneously hating them. This irrational leftist dichotomy always baffled me, at least until actually exploring small towns and meeting people in small towns when suddenly the missing piece of puzzle, the contradictory paradox came together.



In leftist (socialist) countries you always had an elite group of intellectuals who feign caring for others in the oppressed lessor, ‘exploited classes.’ Whenever in power these elites embark on vigorously imposed programs of wealth redistribution to force equality. In collectivist countries, in spite of a history of continuous failure of compelled utopian designs imposed by leftist elites, the elites remain entrenched, thoroughly in love with their own productions. The leftist elites dogmatically rooted in their designs cannot be moved, no matter the resultant collateral damage. This leftist entrenchment is what renders them so insidiously evil, sporting in design what parallels a fundamentalist religion, positions so correct that not only must be heard but must be enforced. The utterly intractable mindset of leftists is why I designate them as being, ‘secular fundamentalists.’
 

LeftyLen

Active Member
Therefore?
Therefore a scenario could, and does seem to be emerging in America like in Germany 100 years ago, red shirts(Marxists) vs black shirts(fascists) in the Wiemer Republic, EXTREMES at both ends of the spectrum in which the 80% middle ignored BOTH, empowering the extremes. That did not end well.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
Therefore a scenario could, and does seem to be emerging in America like in Germany 100 years ago, red shirts(Marxists) vs black shirts(fascists) in the Wiemer Republic, EXTREMES at both ends of the spectrum in which the 80% middle ignored BOTH, empowering the extremes. That did not end well.

I love it when you wax UPPER CASE.

P.S.: Don't tell anyone, but I'm a bit of a Rosa Luxemburg fan. ;)
 

Pogo

Well-Known Member
When driving as a long haul driver listening to the radio or with my online time I make a point of reading and listening to those I disagree with. I listen to both the extremes and moderates to simply acquire an understanding of others, no matter how annoying or even repulsive their positions. There are online those on the far left and far right and everything in between who have plenty to say, each acting like their personal perspectives are singularly the most important perspectives ever uttered that must be heard. I have noted copious comments of those who loath country music stating they envision country music aficionados as deplorable hayseeds. The left relegate rural citizens as deplorables occupying small towns, villages, hamlets. The left as I have assessed see, “agrarian overall wearing yahoos populating those towns, dirty red necked Provencal proletarian hayseeds who are probably in league with the klan -hardly worth the carbon intake their existence entails.” This revulsion I noted in reviews of country music by urban leftists who disdain the working class, particularly the rural variety. Paradoxically the left loath the working class while at the same time harp on the ‘class struggle’ of marginalized workers and other marginalized ‘identity’ groups. The left’s proclaimed egalitarian posture betrayed by their overt condescending view of the working class. This curious dichotomy a perplexing contradiction I have noted about leftists for years, an affirmation of caring about the ‘oppressed’ while simultaneously hating them. This irrational leftist dichotomy always baffled me, at least until actually exploring small towns and meeting people in small towns when suddenly the missing piece of puzzle, the contradictory paradox came together.



In leftist (socialist) countries you always had an elite group of intellectuals who feign caring for others in the oppressed lessor, ‘exploited classes.’ Whenever in power these elites embark on vigorously imposed programs of wealth redistribution to force equality. In collectivist countries, in spite of a history of continuous failure of compelled utopian designs imposed by leftist elites, the elites remain entrenched, thoroughly in love with their own productions. The leftist elites dogmatically rooted in their designs cannot be moved, no matter the resultant collateral damage. This leftist entrenchment is what renders them so insidiously evil, sporting in design what parallels a fundamentalist religion, positions so correct that not only must be heard but must be enforced. The utterly intractable mindset of leftists is why I designate them as being, ‘secular fundamentalists.’
Well there is this.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
Therefore ... like in Germany 100 years ago, red shirts(Marxists) vs black shirts(fascists) in the Wiemer Republic, ...

To be filed under "BTW" ...

Sturmabteilung

Sturmabteilung (German: [ˈʃtʊʁmʔapˌtaɪlʊŋ] ; SA; literally "Storm Division" or Storm Troopers) was the original paramilitary wing of the Nazi Party. It played a significant role in Adolf Hitler's rise to power in the 1920s and early 1930s. Its primary purposes were providing protection for Nazi rallies and assemblies, disrupting the meetings of opposing parties, fighting against the paramilitary units of the opposing parties, especially the Roter Frontkämpferbund of the Communist Party of Germany (KPD) and the Reichsbanner Schwarz-Rot-Gold of the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD), and intimidating Romani, trade unionists, and especially Jews.​
The SA were colloquially called Brownshirts (Braunhemden) because of the colour of their uniform's shirts, similar to Benito Mussolini's blackshirts.​

As for the RFB, to equate a fully justified defense organization with the SA is, in my opinion, morally bankrupt. Perhaps if more people rejected your posturing and took sides in the 20's the Germany of the 30's would have been stillborn.
 

LeftyLen

Active Member
To be filed under "BTW" ...

Sturmabteilung

Sturmabteilung (German: [ˈʃtʊʁmʔapˌtaɪlʊŋ] ; SA; literally "Storm Division" or Storm Troopers) was the original paramilitary wing of the Nazi Party. It played a significant role in Adolf Hitler's rise to power in the 1920s and early 1930s. Its primary purposes were providing protection for Nazi rallies and assemblies, disrupting the meetings of opposing parties, fighting against the paramilitary units of the opposing parties, especially the Roter Frontkämpferbund of the Communist Party of Germany (KPD) and the Reichsbanner Schwarz-Rot-Gold of the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD), and intimidating Romani, trade unionists, and especially Jews.​
The SA were colloquially called Brownshirts (Braunhemden) because of the colour of their uniform's shirts, similar to Benito Mussolini's blackshirts.​

As for the RFB, to equate a fully justified defense organization with the SA is, in my opinion, morally bankrupt. Perhaps if more people rejected your posturing and took sides in the 20's the Germany of the 30's would have been stillborn.
The red shirts were Marxists, over the last 125 years Marxists, collectively have killed imprisoned mare than fascists.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Therefore a scenario could, and does seem to be emerging in America like in Germany 100 years ago, red shirts(Marxists) vs black shirts(fascists) in the Wiemer Republic, EXTREMES at both ends of the spectrum in which the 80% middle ignored BOTH, empowering the extremes. That did not end well.
Where are you finding those red shirts/marxists? They are pretty much an endangered species at this point.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
The red shirts were Marxists, over the last 125 years Marxists, collectively have killed imprisoned mare than fascists.
Marxists are fascists.
  1. (sometimes initial capital letter) a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.
 

Pogo

Well-Known Member
Marxists are fascists.
  1. (sometimes initial capital letter) a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.
NWRT
 
Top