Jeremiahcp
Well-Known Jerk
Too late for that.I try not to judge.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Too late for that.I try not to judge.
Do make an effort to stay on topic, please.
Healthcare for space travel? Usually covered but it may be out of network.@Quetzal. Don't forget about healthcare!
OK, you got me. It's so hard to tell nowadays.Of course. Not sure if you knew I was joking but no more from me after this.
I think its good that Trump is reviving a program based on science which could further science. Good for him.
Plus, how do you tell if it was work related?Healthcare for space travel? Usually covered but it may be out of network.
I didn't criticize Trump.But this is a positive thing! I am not a fan of the Donald, but if he does something that is beneficial, why shouldn't we recognize it?
I would hate to see those forms.Plus, how do you tell if it was work related?
I call it boredom.Hard to tell.
..certainly bitter.
Just a big fan.Quetzal, you involved in Aerospace?
The rise of private spaceflight
Commercial spaceflight has taken off during the Obama presidency. For example, two different American companies, SpaceX and Orbital ATK, are now flying uncrewed resupply missions to the ISS for NASA.
In addition, SpaceX and Boeing hold multibillion-dollar contracts to fly NASA astronauts to and from the orbiting lab, and both companies should start doing so in the next year or two, NASA officials have said. (NASA has been dependent on Russia to provide such taxi services since the retirement of the space shuttle fleet in July 2011, a move set in motion by President George W. Bush in 2004.)
Such public-private cooperation kicked off with the announcement of NASA's Commercial Orbital Transportation Services program in January 2006. But it was "turbocharged" under the Obama administration, which made the development of private crew-carrying vehicles a priority, said Casey Dreier, director of space policy at the nonprofit Planetary Society.
"That, to me, is the biggest legacy [of the Obama administration] — fully embracing the potential of commercial launch capabilities, and really, really making that a priority, and fighting for it against a lot of opposition from Congress," Dreier told Space.com. "I don't think commercial crew was fully funded at NASA until 2015."
Great, now you've done it. Once Trump gets wind that Obama was for it, he's gonna defund all the spacey things.Why is this news? Another distraction. Obama set this ball rolling a long time ago.
President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More
Because the president has expressed interest in wishing to invest financially and politically into space travel. Having the support from the executive branch is a big deal.Why is this news?
I get that. So which MIC player is getting the rewards?Because the president has expressed interest in wishing to invest financially and politically into space travel. Having the support from the executive branch is a big deal.
If it means we get advances in space flight/technologies, does it matter?I get that. So which MIC player is getting the rewards?
ULA are the big boys when it comes to military contracts, right?SpaceX has flown a military mission recently and plans to fly another in 2018.
It matters if it's a typical lobbyist deal. We just gave the MIC a huge payday with the Saudi deal. Since this is the republican party, I can see lobbyists begging for this. Government funds are sought after by private corporations because gov't funds typically have huge profit margins (low cost)If it means we get advances in space flight/technologies, does it matter?