• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump Tariff

John53

I go leaps and bounds
Premium Member
It appears Trump's posting has produced results. Mexico's President has agreed to stop the migration of illegal immigrants into the United States and work to stop drug smuggling.

Trump touts Mexico's 'effectively closing' the border after call with Sheinbaum. She disagrees

The article says nothing about the Mexican president agreeing to stop the migration of illegals.

Edit to add: more importantly it doesn't say anything about Trump cancelling plans for the 25% tariff.
 
Last edited:

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
You have no way of knowing what they have looked at. This statement is piffle.
There's a lot of information about how badly we understand our system of government. A Majority of Americans Can’t Recall Most First Amendment Rights | The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania Add to that ignorance about how a capitalist system works and there's no reason to believe that this was any different for this election.

But if I'm wrong, I'd be interested in a decent poll showing my error.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
She disagrees with the first sentence sentence in the title: "Trump touts Mexico's 'effectively closing' the border after call with Sheinbaum. She disagrees"

No, you don't have to read the article.
Just. Read. The. Title.
No, she disagrees with actually totally closing the border. But Trump didn't ever say to completely close the border. He said effectively closing the border to illegal immigrants, not to legal activities. She will "attend to" (stop) the illegal immigrant caravans crossing the border and will work with the U.S. on the drugs. Everything Trump demanded. Her "disagree" is sophistry, semantics, spin and attempted face saving. She has to posture so she doesn't look like a door mat. She will stop the illegal immigrants from crossing the border. That isn't allowing an open border. It is an effectively CLOSED border. Whether she will admit it or not.

Yes, you have to read the article to know what she disagrees with. Just. Read. The. ARTICLE!

Trump isn't even President yet. He posted on social media, and the Mexican President gave him all he asked for.Trump has gotten all he asked for. If it makes Presidente Sheinbaum feel better she can call it whatever she wants. That doesn't change the facts. She is still folding like a cheap suit. And if you want to go along with her attempting "sour grapes" in order to stay in denial, that's on you. Trump won this one, "bigly".
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
There's a lot of information about how badly we understand our system of government. A Majority of Americans Can’t Recall Most First Amendment Rights | The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania Add to that ignorance about how a capitalist system works and there's no reason to believe that this was any different for this election.

But if I'm wrong, I'd be interested in a decent poll showing my error.
The voters spoke clearly. The opinions of some left wing think tank notwithstanding. You are choosing to listen to the latter instead of the former. That says more about you than the voters.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
The article says nothing about the Mexican president agreeing to stop the migration of illegals.

Edit to add: more importantly it doesn't say anything about Trump cancelling plans for the 25% tariff.
The whole oddball thing about his is that who can stop anyone who enetrs the USA illegally? I'm not sure that migrants are rquired to enter at specific points of entry, but I am aware that migrants can cross anywhere, encounter boder control, and then ask for asylum and it is essentially legal. These people are then part of the immigration system with due process. "Illegals" would be anyone who has entered with the intent to not ask for asylum, I guess.

So I guess the president of Mexico doesn't need to stop the migrants wanting asylum, which makes them "legals".
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
The voters spoke clearly.
They just didn't think clearly. Can you explain what is smart about electing a criminal with mental health issues?
The opinions of some left wing think tank notwithstanding.
And any other rational human being who understands that a criminal with mental health issues is not fit to be president.
You are choosing to listen to the latter instead of the former. That says more about you than the voters.
Voters are not necessarily rational. Remember only a small percentage fewer voted the other way. Would you be saying this if Harris won? Of course not. The fact is those who voted for Trump did not do so rationally. There is no rational basis to have voted for a criminal with mental health issues.
 

John53

I go leaps and bounds
Premium Member
The whole oddball thing about his is that who can stop anyone who enetrs the USA illegally? I'm not sure that migrants are rquired to enter at specific points of entry, but I am aware that migrants can cross anywhere, encounter boder control, and then ask for asylum and it is essentially legal. These people are then part of the immigration system with due process. "Illegals" would be anyone who has entered with the intent to not ask for asylum, I guess.

So I guess the president of Mexico doesn't need to stop the migrants wanting asylum, which makes them "legals".

Yup. The Mexican president couldn't make such a promise because it would be impossible.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
No, she disagrees with actually totally closing the border. But Trump didn't ever say to completely close the border. He said effectively closing the border to illegal immigrants, not to legal activities. She will "attend to" (stop) the illegal immigrant caravans crossing the border and will work with the U.S. on the drugs. Everything Trump demanded. Her "disagree" is sophistry, semantics, spin and attempted face saving. She has to posture so she doesn't look like a door mat. She will stop the illegal immigrants from crossing the border. That isn't allowing an open border. It is an effectively CLOSED border. Whether she will admit it or not.

Yes, you have to read the article to know what she disagrees with. Just. Read. The. ARTICLE!

Trump isn't even President yet. He posted on social media, and the Mexican President gave him all he asked for.Trump has gotten all he asked for. If it makes Presidente Sheinbaum feel better she can call it whatever she wants. That doesn't change the facts. She is still folding like a cheap suit. And if you want to go along with her attempting "sour grapes" in order to stay in denial, that's on you. Trump won this one, "bigly".
No one has said anything about legal activities. Even FOX! had this to say
President-elect Trump said he spoke with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, saying she has agreed to "stop Migration through Mexico, and into the United States"...

 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
The voters spoke clearly. The opinions of some left wing think tank notwithstanding. You are choosing to listen to the latter instead of the former. That says more about you than the voters.
You ignored my point. It's useless to try to discuss something with someone who won't respond to the post I made but just repeats his point. But do you believe that Americans in general really know what is in the Constitution, the First Amendment and so forth along with being economically educated so they can make informed decisions about who to vote for? Again, if you disagree with the posts I made respond to them if you want to have a conversation.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Four more years of Trump delusion and gaslighting us. God help us. This freak will have control of the nukes.
Remain in your Tom Clancy fantasyland that Trump will control the nukes by himself. Have fun with that.

The rest of the world will focus on the real issues that plague this nation.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
No one has said anything about legal activities. Even FOX! had this to say
President-elect Trump said he spoke with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, saying she has agreed to "stop Migration through Mexico, and into the United States"...

However it goes, I'm sure the numbers at the border will fall to manageable levels.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
They just didn't think clearly. Can you explain what is smart about electing a criminal with mental health issues?

And any other rational human being who understands that a criminal with mental health issues is not fit to be president.

Voters are not necessarily rational. Remember only a small percentage fewer voted the other way. Would you be saying this if Harris won? Of course not. The fact is those who voted for Trump did not do so rationally. There is no rational basis to have voted for a criminal with mental health issues.
You do know all the same tired crap you're spewing out isn't working anymore.
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
No, she disagrees with actually totally closing the border. But Trump didn't ever say to completely close the border. He said effectively closing the border to illegal immigrants, not to legal activities. She will "attend to" (stop) the illegal immigrant caravans crossing the border and will work with the U.S. on the drugs. Everything Trump demanded. Her "disagree" is sophistry, semantics, spin and attempted face saving. She has to posture so she doesn't look like a door mat. She will stop the illegal immigrants from crossing the border. That isn't allowing an open border. It is an effectively CLOSED border. Whether she will admit it or not.

Great. Where did she say that she agreed to doing more than what she had already planned?
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Inflation is up again to 2.3% and the CPI core prices are up 2.8%.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/i...mer-fed-weighs-how-much-to-cut-rates-fe420832
Oh, look that wasn't Fox News. :rolleyes:
What is obvious is that you are in denial.
View attachment 100312
Apparently, you didn't notice the gradual decline, and also you fail to mention the simple fact that our inflation rate is lower than basically all the western democracies. And if inflation truly was of your concern, then you should be stressed with Trump's
stating he will significantly raise tariffs.

IOW, you are making 0 sense.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Even when(if) those tariffs raise prices, most if not all will still be cheaper than those made in the US.
It won't be enough to get people to buy American but if prices rise due to the tariffs, collected sales tax will rise with it.
Again, you really don't understand the ripple effect as prices will go up and quite dramatically on some items.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
So much for all the talk before the election about defending democracy. Some people only pay lip service to democracy when what they really mean is that it is fine so long as it agrees with them.
Says the one who supports and defends the one who tried to overturn the 2020 election. :rolleyes:
 
Top