• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump Wants to Terminate Articles of the Constitution

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
As I said last month on another thread... "If Trump gets in again, he will try to change it all and declare himself king".
I doubt that "king" would seem grandiose enough for him. After all, Liz's son Chuck is "King" now, and Trump knows he's much more important than some old guy from a little Island not even in Europe.

No, I'm sure he'll hold out for a much grander-sounding title than just "king."
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
I would not have the first clue as to comfort. A thong does not look comfortable either, and yet many women seem to really like them. And I do not know who women do this for. But I do enjoy the effort.
I doubt that "king" would seem grandiose enough for him. After all, Liz's son Chuck is "King" now, and Trump knows he's much more important than some old guy from a little Island not even in Europe.

No, I'm sure he'll hold out for a much grander-sounding title than just "king."

Knowing his perpetual and inappropriate use of superlatives, I wonder if he would settle for 'the greatest, most incredible pompous a-hole to ever live'?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I doubt that "king" would seem grandiose enough for him. After all, Liz's son Chuck is "King" now, and Trump knows he's much more important than some old guy from a little Island not even in Europe.

No, I'm sure he'll hold out for a much grander-sounding title than just "king."
But Trump would be King of a major country,
not a past its prime appendage of Scotland.
 

Ponder This

Well-Known Member
To all you Trump supporters out there who revere the Constitution: what do you do with this?

"So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Trump "truthed."

Donald Trump calls for the 'termination' of the United States Constitution over 2020 loss

Trump is wrong.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
To all you Trump supporters out there who revere the Constitution: what do you do with this?

"So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Trump "truthed."

Donald Trump calls for the 'termination' of the United States Constitution over 2020 loss
So he is saying the massive election fraud effectively terminates the Constitution, not himself.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
So he is saying the massive election fraud effectively terminates the Constitution, not himself.
If such a "massive" fraud supposedly exists, then why did almost all the judicial rulings go against him, including by his own judicial appointees?

On top of this, you are reading what you want to see, thus ignoring the actual wording by Trump:
"So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution".
 

Aštra’el

Aštara, Blade of Aštoreth
Trump is my favorite President of all time, and I will vote for him in 2024… but every now and then it is perfectly acceptable to have a laugh at the Supreme Leader’s incredible personality:


B4CBB561-D747-4B6E-8D21-5FC385ADEB7F.png
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
If such a "massive" fraud supposedly exists, then why did almost all the judicial rulings go against him, including by his own judicial appointees?

On top of this, you are reading what you want to see, thus ignoring the actual wording by Trump:
"So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution".
Separate issue. The text which you re-quoted clearly states that a putative massive fraud would terminate the rules, etc. So it is the putative fraud that would terminate the Constitution, not Trump himself. Which is precisely what I wrote.

It isn't I who is twisting the text. It is those that want it to say Trump is terminating the Constitution that is blatantly torturing the text to comport with their narrative.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Separate issue. The text which you re-quoted clearly states that a putative massive fraud would terminate the rules, etc. So it is the putative fraud that would terminate the Constitution, not Trump himself. Which is precisely what I wrote.

It isn't I who is twisting the text. It is those that want it to say Trump is terminating the Constitution that is blatantly torturing the text to comport with their narrative.
Gee, then all those Republicans who interpret what he said the way I have are all wrong and you're right? The only thing you've established is that you will do anything to defend his words and actions, much like so many others did to defend the actions of 20th century fascists and 21st century neo-fascists of which Trump is one of the latter. It's so utterly unbelievable that you support and defend a former president that dines with anti-Semites and racists and tried to overturn an election.
 

wellwisher

Well-Known Member
To all you Trump supporters out there who revere the Constitution: what do you do with this?

"So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Trump "truthed."

Donald Trump calls for the 'termination' of the United States Constitution over 2020 loss

His first sentence is what this is about. He claims that the 2020 election was full of corruption, such as proof that FBI and Twitter colluded to suppress facts, that would have impacted the election. The power of the state is now being used to try to cover this up. There is no precedent or safeguard in the Constitution to deal with this other than impeachment, but this alone does not make the victims right.

A better way to look art this is to answer the question, what would the Democrats do, if the shoes was on the other foot? Say Trump had been successful at stopping Biden from being sworn in as president, until an investigation into election interference was complete. Trump was still president for several months after the election and in this scenario he used the AG to say we need to have an investigation. Trump would remain as President for the time being, for national security reasons. The national security claim would hand cuff the Democrats for the time being until we get past inauguration day then we leave the Constitution.

Since this would have been a dishonest use of power, that has no precedent, the Democrats would need to figure out how to overcome someone who was a crook, who was now entrenched with the powers of the Constitution; he has separation of powers. He can now foot drag the investigation and assume his second term, illegitimately.

Picture if Trump also had the FBI in his pocket and he could use them to spy and harass anyone who spoke out; sound familiar, under the guise of national security. He do thing worse than Nixon and have an excuse. Say he also had mass media and Hi Tech on his side; due to pressure he applies and tax dollar he spends. They agree to run propaganda and disinformation for him, while censoring anything that could weaken his power or make the people turn against him.

There is nothing in the Constitution to make his right, since even checks and balances by the press is not working anymore, due to the crooks in power. This should make it easier for the Left to see. What is happening at Twitter; release of the twitter files, will be more formally investigated in January. The results may open eyes and require something be done to right all the wrongs on an epic scale.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
His first sentence is what this is about. He claims that the 2020 election was full of corruption, such as proof that FBI and Twitter colluded to suppress facts, that would have impacted the election. The power of the state is now being used to try to cover this up.
That is complete nonsense as even the judges he appointed have ruled against him.
 
Top