• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trumps is thinking about firing Rod Rosenstien

Shad

Veteran Member
There is nothing wrong with a reasonable defense. Unfortunately Trump sounds like a five year old when describing his "enemies" on Twitter. He is not putting up a reasonable defense, he is putting up an irrational one.

I do not see his use of twitter regarding this topic as an actual defense but attempt to undermine the whole process in the public eye. Keep in mind Trump either believes in the Deep State (swamp) or merely utilizes the belief held by others.
 
Last edited:

Thermos aquaticus

Well-Known Member
I do not see his use of twitter regarding this topic as an actual defense but attempt to undermine the whole process in the public eye. Keep in mind Trump either believes in the Deep State (swamp) or merely utilizes the believe held by others.

The rules of the courtroom:

1. When the facts are on your side you argue the law.
2. When the law is on your side you argue the facts.
3. When neither the law nor the facts are on your side, you attack the other people in the courtroom.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
People on Fox News think Hillary should be thrown in jail for the Uranium One non-controversy, for crying out loud. There are Republicans who are currently pushing for an investigation where there is absolutely zero evidence of any wrongdoing, or even any evidence of Clinton being involved in the approval of Uranium One's contract. I'm not making this up.

I know fully well Fox has long been Pro-Trump, and Pro-GOP for decades. It targets a specific audience to stay in business thus caters to that audience.
 

Thermos aquaticus

Well-Known Member
I know fully well Fox has long been Pro-Trump, and Pro-GOP for decades. It targets a specific audience to stay in business thus caters to that audience.

If they replaced Trump with Hillary and all of the same facts were still in place, you wouldn't be supporting the current investigation?
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
I know fully well Fox has long been Pro-Trump, and Pro-GOP for decades. It targets a specific audience to stay in business thus caters to that audience.
Fox targets conservatives intentionally with panic mongering scare tactics. This allows the republican establishment to garnish votes for corporate policies. It would be tough for people to vote republican if it weren't for the emotional trickery (propaganda)
 

Shad

Veteran Member
If they replaced Trump with Hillary and all of the same facts were still in place, you wouldn't be supporting the current investigation?

I would want to see it to a normal end by Mueller. I do not like the alternatives as it would leave the public in the dark. Ending it by order, direct or not, by POTUS is a horrible idea. Even what I consider speculation would hang over major issues until at least 2020, probably longer. At least with Mueller there would be a resolution if not one favorable to either of our views.
 
Top