• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

"Trump's Lies vs. Obama's"

Skwim

Veteran Member
From the New York Times

By DAVID LEONHARDT, IAN PRASAD PHILBRICK and STUART A. THOMPSON
DEC. 14, 2017

27287173789_24979f6ff7_b.jpg

"After we published a list of President Trump’s lies this summer, we heard a common response from his supporters. They said, in effect: Yes, but if you made a similar list for previous presidents, it would be just as bad.

We’ve set out to make that list. Here, you will find our attempt at a comprehensive catalog of the falsehoods that Barack Obama told while he was president. (We also discuss George W. Bush below, although the lack of real-time fact-checking during his presidency made a comprehensive list impossible.)

We applied the same conservative standard to Obama and Trump, counting only demonstrably and substantially false statements. The result: Trump is unlike any other modern president. He seems virtually indifferent to reality, often saying whatever helps him make the case he’s trying to make.

In his first 10 months in office, he has told 103 separate untruths, many of them repeatedly. Obama told 18 over his entire eight-year tenure. That’s an average of about two a year for Obama and about 124 a year for Trump.​

25197935308_017e1fda10_b.jpg


Separately, we have updated our earlier list of Trump's lies, which also includes repeated falsehoods. This article counts only distinct falsehoods for both Trump and Obama.

If we had used a less strict standard, Trump would look even worse by comparison. He makes misleading statements and mild exaggerations – about economic statistics, his political opponents and many other subjects – far more often than Obama. We left out any statement that could be plausibly defended even if many people would disagree with the president's interpretation. We also left out modest quantitative errors, such as Trump's frequent imprecision with numbers.

We have used the word “lies” again here, as we did in our original piece. If anything, though, the word is unfair to Obama and Bush. When they became aware that they had been saying something untrue, they stopped doing it. Obama didn’t continue to claim that all Americans would be able to keep their existing health insurance under Obamacare, for example, and Bush changed the way he spoke about Iraq’s weapons capability.

Trump is different. When he is caught lying, he will often try to discredit people telling the truth, be they judges, scientists, F.B.I. or C.I.A. officials, journalists or members of Congress. Trump is trying to make truth irrelevant. It is extremely damaging to democracy, and it’s not an accident. It’s core to his political strategy.

As for Obama: His falsehoods tended to be attempts to make his own policies look better or to overstate a problem he was trying to solve. In a few cases, they seemed to be careless exaggerations he avoided repeating.

Over all, Obama rarely told demonstrable untruths as president. And he appears to have become more careful over time. We counted six straight-up falsehoods in his first year in office. Across his entire second four-year term, we counted the same number, six, only one of which came in his final year in office.

In all, we found 18 different bald untruths from Obama during his presidency. Trump told his 18th separate untruth in his third full week in office, and his list keeps growing.

In fact, Trump tells falsehoods about Obama and his administration more often than Obama told falsehoods about all subjects. Since his inauguration, Trump has told 10 separate untruths about Obama, including false allegations of wiretapping and false descriptions of Obamacare. We counted only two falsehoods Obama told about Bush.​

List of lies for both presidents follows
after which the article continues
click HERE


.
 
Last edited:

Jumi

Well-Known Member
If Obama lied only 18 times in office during 8 years he would have been a saint among all presidents and politicians that have existed during all time. But look at the legacy in Syria, Libya... would that have happened if he was a saint.

Perhaps he disagreed with the mainstream medias views only 18 times, that would sound more logical.
 

Jumi

Well-Known Member
Those are indeed the worst kind of liars.
Both in the damage that they cause and the unlikelihood of change, usually.
Sounds like most politicians to me. Can't convince others if you can't convince yourself.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Sounds like most politicians to me. Can't convince others if you can't convince yourself.
It's a job requirement. Top officials know things that would be damaging to reveal. That is a major reason why it's important to know when you're lying and when you aren't. Also, that politicians be held to high standards and not be allowed to misuse their latitude to put their own interests above their constituents.
Tom
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I looked at the first few items on the list of what they considered "lies," and I think they're stretching the definition of "lie" quite a bit.

“I wasn't a fan of Iraq. I didn't want to go into Iraq.” (He was for an invasion before he was against it.)

So, he changed his mind. That's not exactly a "lie."

“A reporter for Time magazine — and I have been on their cover 14 or 15 times. I think we have the all-time record in the history of Time magazine.” (Trump was on the cover 11 times and Nixon appeared 55 times.)

A slight exaggeration. "14 or 15" versus "11." Big deal.

“Between 3 million and 5 million illegal votes caused me to lose the popular vote.” (There's no evidence of illegal voting.)

There's no evidence for God either, so does that make every president who believes in God a liar?

“Now, the audience was the biggest ever. But this crowd was massive. Look how far back it goes. This crowd was massive.” (Official aerial photos show Obama's 2009 inauguration was much more heavily attended.)

Another exaggeration, not a lie.

I didn't go through all of them, but it seems like they're reaching. Besides, none of these "lies" really affect anything or have any relevance to any specific issue. Compare that with Nixon's famous "I'm not a crook" or Reagan's "We didn't trade arms for hostages." Reagan also said that there's no word for "freedom" in Russian, which was part of his whole "evil empire" spiel.

Then there was Clinton, who was quite vague on his stance on NAFTA during his campaign (trying to suggest that he was against it), but then came out in favor of it, as if he was one of its most enthusiastic supporters. Technically, it may not have been a lie, but a gross, despicable betrayal of America's working class. Any Democrat who supported NAFTA was worse than a liar, since it was a betrayal of the working class, and the Democrats' claim to be the party of the working man.
 

Jumi

Well-Known Member
So, he changed his mind. That's not exactly a "lie."
Also reading that link, it's hard to know which Iraq war he was talking about. If he supported Bush Sr.'s war, but not Bush Jr.'s it's still different. Keep in mind the last war hadn't happened yet in 2002.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Then there was Clinton, who was quite vague on his stance on NAFTA during his campaign (trying to suggest that he was against it), but then came out in favor of it, as if he was one of its most enthusiastic supporters. Technically, it may not have been a lie, but a gross, despicable betrayal of America's working class. Any Democrat who supported NAFTA was worse than a liar, since it was a betrayal of the working class, and the Democrats' claim to be the party of the working man.
This is the kind of big lie that turned me from a non-partisan voter into an anti-Republican voter. That is not the same as a Democratic voter.
I do remember the campaign where the Republicans touted the boon to the economy their NAFTA proposal represented and how important it was to vote Republican because Clinton wouldn't sign it, due to Clinton's ties to unions that were vehemently opposed to it.

I didn't grasp the long term ramifications of NAFTA myself. I, too, saw Clinton's unwillingness to commit to it as a strike against him. But that was then and this is now. The damage it did to our economy is clear. So now the Republicans want to disown it and lie about where it came from.
Rather like ACA.
Tom
 

Faithofchristian

Well-Known Member
From the New York Times

By DAVID LEONHARDT, IAN PRASAD PHILBRICK and STUART A. THOMPSON
DEC. 14, 2017

27287173789_24979f6ff7_b.jpg

"After we published a list of President Trump’s lies this summer, we heard a common response from his supporters. They said, in effect: Yes, but if you made a similar list for previous presidents, it would be just as bad.

We’ve set out to make that list. Here, you will find our attempt at a comprehensive catalog of the falsehoods that Barack Obama told while he was president. (We also discuss George W. Bush below, although the lack of real-time fact-checking during his presidency made a comprehensive list impossible.)

We applied the same conservative standard to Obama and Trump, counting only demonstrably and substantially false statements. The result: Trump is unlike any other modern president. He seems virtually indifferent to reality, often saying whatever helps him make the case he’s trying to make.

In his first 10 months in office, he has told 103 separate untruths, many of them repeatedly. Obama told 18 over his entire eight-year tenure. That’s an average of about two a year for Obama and about 124 a year for Trump.​

25197935308_017e1fda10_b.jpg


Separately, we have updated our earlier list of Trump's lies, which also includes repeated falsehoods. This article counts only distinct falsehoods for both Trump and Obama.

If we had used a less strict standard, Trump would look even worse by comparison. He makes misleading statements and mild exaggerations – about economic statistics, his political opponents and many other subjects – far more often than Obama. We left out any statement that could be plausibly defended even if many people would disagree with the president's interpretation. We also left out modest quantitative errors, such as Trump's frequent imprecision with numbers.

We have used the word “lies” again here, as we did in our original piece. If anything, though, the word is unfair to Obama and Bush. When they became aware that they had been saying something untrue, they stopped doing it. Obama didn’t continue to claim that all Americans would be able to keep their existing health insurance under Obamacare, for example, and Bush changed the way he spoke about Iraq’s weapons capability.

Trump is different. When he is caught lying, he will often try to discredit people telling the truth, be they judges, scientists, F.B.I. or C.I.A. officials, journalists or members of Congress. Trump is trying to make truth irrelevant. It is extremely damaging to democracy, and it’s not an accident. It’s core to his political strategy.

As for Obama: His falsehoods tended to be attempts to make his own policies look better or to overstate a problem he was trying to solve. In a few cases, they seemed to be careless exaggerations he avoided repeating.

Over all, Obama rarely told demonstrable untruths as president. And he appears to have become more careful over time. We counted six straight-up falsehoods in his first year in office. Across his entire second four-year term, we counted the same number, six, only one of which came in his final year in office.

In all, we found 18 different bald untruths from Obama during his presidency. Trump told his 18th separate untruth in his third full week in office, and his list keeps growing.

In fact, Trump tells falsehoods about Obama and his administration more often than Obama told falsehoods about all subjects. Since his inauguration, Trump has told 10 separate untruths about Obama, including false allegations of wiretapping and false descriptions of Obamacare. We counted only two falsehoods Obama told about Bush.​

List of lies for both presidents follows
after which the article continues
click HERE


.


That's to funny, That you actually believe NY times, that has been caught many times in putting out Fake news and found in Contradicting themselves.

NY times, CNN, are fake news media networks.
And you believe them.ROFL

CNN, NY Times and the Mainstream News Media, are saying that Trump's poll Rating are sinking in the polls.

But yet the Supporters of Trump are still backing Trump, So how is Trump's poll Ratings sinking? It was Trump supporters who voted for Trump and got Trump elected and are still here in Supporting Trump.

Was it not CNN, NY Times and the Mainstream News Media that said Hillary is winning the Election, But then Hillary lost.
All due to the fact that CNN, NY Times and the Mainstream News Media all lied to you all.

And you all are still falling for their lies, Now that's amazing.
 
Last edited:

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
This is the kind of big lie that turned me from a non-partisan voter into an anti-Republican voter. That is not the same as a Democratic voter.
I do remember the campaign where the Republicans touted the boon to the economy their NAFTA proposal represented and how important it was to vote Republican because Clinton wouldn't sign it, due to Clinton's ties to unions that were vehemently opposed to it.

I didn't grasp the long term ramifications of NAFTA myself. I, too, saw Clinton's unwillingness to commit to it as a strike against him. But that was then and this is now. The damage it did to our economy is clear. So now the Republicans want to disown it and lie about where it came from.
Rather like ACA.
Tom

Yes, the Republicans were the bigger cheerleaders for NAFTA, but they also needed support from the Democrats in Congress who were holding out. Just like "only Nixon could go to China," they needed a Democratic president (like Clinton) who was in favor of NAFTA and who could use the party muscle to bring the hardheads in line and get the thing ramrodded through Congress. A Republican president would not have been able to do that, and NAFTA would have died. That's why Clinton's betrayal was far worse than anything the Republicans could have done.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Question for all here....
When you decide whom to vote for, is it based upon who is the bigger or lesser liar?

If you support a candidate based upon their politics, have you ever switched sides
after discovering your original choice was the bigger liar?
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I don't believe that is true and I know it isn't what the Republicans were saying at the time.
Tom

It's not what the Republicans were saying, but for those who wanted NAFTA passed, giving the White House to a "Democrat" (and with Clinton, he was a wolf in sheep's clothing) was a small price to pay.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
It's not what the Republicans were saying, but for those who wanted NAFTA passed, giving the White House to a "Democrat" (and with Clinton, he was a wolf in sheep's clothing) was a small price to pay.
I rated this post in the most sarcastic possible way.
Tom
 
Top