Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
That requires objective evidence to verify.
Depends. Some claim prayer is sufficient, and they are just as adamant their religion is the truthful one.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Turning to G-d does not stall progress of science. Does it ?
- Thread starter paarsurrey
- Start date
That God(s) isn't used as a reason for any scientific test (or lack thereof) nor should we attempt to disprove or prove God(s) using science.
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Did I say that science should take up the matter if G-d exists ? I never said it. Right,please?
Regards
A lot of Nobel prize winners have been Christian.
Nimos
Well-Known Member
What is meant by that statement is simply, that God per definition is considered supernatural, which is something that science doesn't work with.
If you are performing an experiment and add a bit of God to it, basically anything is possible.
Just to make it perfectly clear, it doesn't mean that religious people are not scientific or capable of doing science. In fact by far the majority of religious people that work in science have absolutely no issue with it.
Milton Platt
Well-Known Member
Only if one stops seeking answers via the scientific methods and just relies on old stories and personal revelation, etc.
If turning to God means turning away from science you're probably stumbling along in the wrong direction.
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
The people have to understand their religion and follow it . If they ignore it and opt to follow their own desires, the truthful religion does not force them. Does one want that religion should apply force, please?
Regards
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Does science say that religion should follow "scientific method", please?
My understanding is that scientific method is only for science, and not for religion. Right, please?
Regards
True, but not enough information, but the ancient religions are divided and conflated concerning science.
Milton Platt
Well-Known Member
I did not say that, and science says nothing about religion. That was not what you asked in your OP
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
It is a wrong notion that all scientists deny existence of G-d. Right, please?
Regards
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
No truthful founder of any great religions ever opposed science. Right,please?
Regards
Ask the "scientists" at the discover institute.
Luckily they are only a very tiny fraction of of scientists who hold god dear.
Although most scientists do not believe in a god (i have heard as many as 93% hold no religious belief) some of the greatest discoveries have been made by scientists who gave a belief in god
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Science is a different domain, so it doesnt have to say anything about the truthful religion. Right,please?
Regards
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
"some of the greatest discoveries have been made by scientists who gave a belief in god"
It gives evidence that the truthful religion is an ally of science. Right,please?
Regards
Milton Platt
Well-Known Member
Only those religious claims which can be tested, such as the efficacy of prayer.
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
It is not a scientific problem so science has got nothing to do with it, please?
Regards
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
While making utmost endeavors to find a vaccine for the Corona-virus, it won't stall if they also turn to G-d. That is my understanding, please?
Regards