Yes, “back to God who gave it.”
It is an “it.”
It is spirit, it is part of man. Man is more than the physical.
The "it" is no more than grammatical and in the English translation.
"It" has no male or female gender but "it" is alive, and in fact it is the life of the body.
As shown in the rest of the Bible, the spirit of man is more than just a life force however.
And Psalms 146:4 simply says about man, “His spirit goes out…”
Just like the lightbulb “goes out” when the electricity is turned off.
How does it go “back to God”?
In the same sense as that electricity…. it “goes back” to the Power Company, they’re the ones who generated it, so it’s theirs. It will certainly be them to make you pay for it! Haha.
And when the power “goes out,” everything electric is ‘dead.’
Psalm 146:3 Do not put your trust in princes,
in human beings, who cannot save.
4 When their spirit departs, they return to the ground;
on that very day their plans come to nothing.
5 Blessed are those whose help is the God of Jacob,
whose hope is in the Lord their God.
This translation has "departs". You can have the analogy of a light bulb but that "goes out" is not what is meant. The spirit, an actual spirit in us, departs from us at death. As Jesus said, "Into your hands I commit my spirit".
Notice the spirit belongs to Jesus and it goes back to God to take care of it.
It is this spirit which is the soul which lives on after the death of the body. (Matt 110:28)
It is this soul which comes back into the body to bring it back to life. (1Kings 17:22)
(when I spoke of Psalm 146 I think I was referring to the use JWs wrongly make of it by saying that it shows that there is no consciousness after death.)
And there’s no difference between our (human) spirit / life force, and that of animals. - Ecclesiastes 3:19-20
Eccles 3:18 I also said to myself, “As for humans, God tests them so that they may see that they are like the animals. 19 Surely the fate of human beings is like that of the animals; the same fate awaits them both: As one dies, so dies the other. All have the same breath; humans have no advantage over animals. Everything is meaningless. 20 All go to the same place; all come from dust, and to dust all return. 21 Who knows if the human spirit rises upward and if the spirit of the animal goes down into the earth?”
22 So I saw that there is nothing better for a person than to enjoy their work, because that is their lot. For who can bring them to see what will happen after them?
I suppose you believe everything is meaningless and we have no advantage over the animals but I believe everything is not meaningless and we do have advantage over the animals and our life comes directly from God and we are set up for fellowship with God.
JWs like to understand Ecclesiastes literally when it suites their purpose.
It’s not me. Genesis 3:19
So you’re claiming that more was going to happen to Adam at his death, and God just didn’t tell him about it? That is called ‘lying by omission.’
I'm sure JWs know of the term "gradual revelation" and how God does not, and has not in the Bible, told us all things about a subject at once.
Judging by the JW use of earlier revelation on a subject and ignoring later revelation, maybe you did not realise that.
But really "no". God had already told us in the creation that we are both spirit and dust and so going back to dust is plainly only what happens to the part that is made from dust. It is just that God did not say at that stage what happens to the spirit. So even with your belief about "spirit" you could still accuse God of lying by omission if you like.
And the Bible also talks about “the
spirit of the world” (1 Corinthians 2:12); Samson’s ‘
spirit returning’ (Judges 15:19); to “worship with
spirit” (John 4:24); “the
spirit of wisdom” (Exodus 28:3); etc.
the Greek word “pneuma” & Hebrew word “ru’ach” translated spirit can have different meanings….
https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/tl/r1/lp-e?q=spirit
It's great that JWs believe that "spirit" can have different meanings but when it comes to the meaning that we are spirit living in a body, a tent, you somehow don't want to see that meaning even though it is plainly spoken of.