• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

U.S. European Allies Not Happy With Biden's Afghanstain Policy

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
The Taliban was the government when we went in. We wouldn't have attempted to remove them if they had given us Al-Qaeda. So things are gong back to the way they were before we got involved.

Frankly, the Taliban needed to be taken out whether or not they supported Bib Laden. Their treatment of women and their destruction of the Buddhas at Bamayan were enough for me to say they needed to go.

But, of course, the US messed even that up.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
It was, but the fragility of the Afghan forces was unanticipated.

Monday-morning quarterbacking is soooooo much easier.

Actually, it was very much anticipated. It was known they had very little support for the government and that the Taliban were gaining strength.

Did anyone really believe the defense forces the US trained would be able to do anything?
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
It was, but the fragility of the Afghan forces was unanticipated.

Monday-morning quarterbacking is soooooo much easier.
Such a withdrawal doesn't leave me feeling confident the planning was much more than "leave and abandon allies and those who stuck their necks out for us (again)."
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Such a withdrawal doesn't leave me feeling confident the planning was much more than "leave and abandon allies and those who stuck their necks out for us (again)."

Given the track record of the US, is that any surprise at all?
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
Frankly, the Taliban needed to be taken out whether or not they supported Bib Laden. Their treatment of women and their destruction of the Buddhas at Bamayan were enough for me to say they needed to go.

But, of course, the US messed even that up.

What government would have been supported in the region?
Maybe there was a "right" way to go about it, but certainly a heck of a lot of wrong ways.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
The people happened. And the Taliban just walked across the land...their land.
If it's their land they wouldn't have had to take it with violence, nor would they need extreme laws, strictness, and violence to maintain that control.
They know nothing than how to reign in fear and terror. They are no real leaders or rulers, only bullies who are highly trained and armed.
The amount of people fleeing and fearing for their lives is no suggestion or indication it is the Taliban's land.
 

esmith

Veteran Member
Trump wanted us out on May 1st of this year, which would leave us even less prepared, but Biden felt that this was rushing things too much.
So, President Trump wanted to leave in May of this year and Biden said that was rushing it fast.
So, just what did stumbling Joe devise for a plan....Give you a hint. Not a damn thing.

And one would have hoped that we learned our lesson in Vietnam that occupying another country is fraught with difficulty, but we have the memory span of a gnat.
I seem to remember that we did a excellent job in Japan and Germany after WWII.
 

oldbadger

Skanky Old Mongrel!
Seems the Biden honeymoon with Eurpoean allies didn't last long.
Biden heads to NATO amid friction over Afghanistan withdrawal

We've all been thoroughly squashed, I'm sad to say. Not just the USA.

I read part of that linked article and noticed how
' ......this week in Brussels, where officials must begin to tackle a series of unanswered questions about the future of Afghanistan .....'

You see? There are still buffoons in Europe wanting to discuss a country's future when they have been totally defeated. Nut cases.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Given the track record of the US, is that any surprise at all?

I'm sad to say that it is.....now.
For awhile it's going to be determined by who has the biggest stick. Faction and regime changes tend to happen in that area, and regional warlords usually don't go quietly.
You see? There are still buffoons in Europe wanting to discuss a country's future when they have been totally defeated. Nut cases.
It would be nuts for them to not discuss what happened and what the future looks like. The Taliban does, after all, likely pose an international threat.
 

esmith

Veteran Member
Ah! So that is a pretty good 'tell' to show us a Tribal Politico, esmith.
I don't think we'll get a balanced view from you....just sayin'
Didn't see you compaining about the names given to President Trump.
Obviously you do not have a balanced view.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Actually, it was very much anticipated. It was known they had very little support for the government and that the Taliban were gaining strength.
Yes, but that was being downplayed by all four of our presidents and their military spokesmen.

IMO, it was a HUGE mistake to occupy Afghanistan to begin with.

Did anyone really believe the defense forces the US trained would be able to do anything?
It's like if I went into your house because you & your spouse were arguing and then staying for 20 years to "keep the peace".
 
Top