• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

UN peace plan

greatcalgarian

Well-Known Member
Booko said:
The UN has declared Shebaa Farms to be Syrian territory. If the Syrians don't like the IDF occupying it, it's their business to take it up with Israel, not Hezbollah.

According to another thread, some one said that Turks sold the land of Palestinian to Jews, and so currently those land had become Jews, and the nation of Israel.

In this case, Syrians has categorical stated that Shebaa Farms belong to Lebonan. I am not sure how UN has a hand in declaring Shebaa Farms to be Syrian territory when umteen times, Syria has told UN that land BELONGS to Lebanon.

What ever the case may be, UN has not said the land belong to Israel, and accordingly, Israel is illegally occupying a foreign land, has it become legal just that UN said it belongs to Syria?

Your analogy is great. Why should Bush go in to overthrow Sadam? Is Bush an Iraqi? He has dual citizenship that gave him the right to go in to overthrow the government there? So this is your link of Israel - Syria - Hezbellah on a piece of land argument.:p
 

egroen

Member
According to another thread, some one said that Turks sold the land of Palestinian to Jews, and so currently those land had become Jews, and the nation of Israel.
Wow, you really selective eye-sight, don't you?

Yes, it was said the Turks sold land to the jews... how this translates into the nation of Israel, well you better explain that to me.

In reality, the Turks lost WWI and they signed these lands over to the french and british in accords with their peace treaty. This is what happens in war... typically the defeated power, well... loses. Except in the case of Israel, who keeps giving back the land it conquers to the arabs.

-Erin
 

greatcalgarian

Well-Known Member
egroen said:
Wow, you really selective eye-sight, don't you?

Yes, it was said the Turks sold land to the jews... how this translates into the nation of Israel, well you better explain that to me.

In reality, the Turks lost WWI and they signed these lands over to the french and british in accords with their peace treaty. This is what happens in war... typically the defeated power, well... loses. Except in the case of Israel, who keeps giving back the land it conquers to the arabs.

-Erin

I have no idea how that translates into the nation of Israel, some one use that to justify the existence of Israel nation, I think.

The Turks surrendering of land to the British and French is not the same as the one quoted by some one in the other thread. That was talking about Jews buying land legally from the Turks:p , perhaps the poster mistaken the buying of Palestinian arab land during British occupation period.

Anyway my contention is that the current land where Israel nation sits on, about more than 50 years ago (that is prior to 1948) has a majority of Palestinian Arab, Christian and Jews, those residence staying there for several generation. It was around the time when the Zionist movement started the mass immigration of Jews into the Palestinian land that started the conflict between the Palestinian Arab and the newly immigrated in Jewish population. And this immigration is partly caused by the Nazi persecution of the Jews living in Europe, as well as the Jews feeling persecuted living in Britain.
For how many generation have those Jews lived in their 'adopted land' before immigrating from all over the world into the land of Palestinian around the period from 1920 to 1948? When did those Jews left their motherland (Palestinian) to live in other nations? During Caesar time? During the Persian Empire time? Why were they living outside Palestinian during all those time? There were Palestinian Jews staying back and living in Palestinian land during the rule of the various conquerers of the land.
In actual fact, when the British took over the control of the Palestinian land from the Turks, the land residence was MAJORITY Palestinian Arab muslim. It was the policy of the British that allowed mass immigration of Jews into the Palestinian land that cause the present day problem. Who made all those Jews immigrating back to Palestinian land other than Nazi? If those Jews are making a good living, being treated equal in their land of adopted citizenship, some may immigrate back on religious belief reason, but I do not think there will be such a large population movement.
Even taking for granted that Jews have a passion of returning to their promised land according to their religion, this should be done peacefully. The British formulation was already biased, and when handed over to the UN, it was in a mess. The surrounding Arab nations made a mess out of everything by interferring with the internal affair of the Palestinian people. What they should have done is to have the UN stopped the mass immigration, and just hold a democratic election to let the residence of the people during that time to determine their own future, that is, they should enforce a disarmament of both the Jewish militants (there was no Israel nation then, so they can only be termed as Jewish militants, and in Bush definition, those are terrorist :p as well same as the Arab militants) and the Arab militants, and we would not have the current middle east problem.
 

kai

ragamuffin
Booko said:
The UN has declared Shebaa Farms to be Syrian territory. If the Syrians don't like the IDF occupying it, it's their business to take it up with Israel, not Hezbollah.
i think the syrians use Hezbollah as a proxy , Syria tends to view Lebenon as part of greater syria anyway so in a way they are doing something about it and this way it makes Israel the badguy and Hezbollah the freedom fighter
 

kai

ragamuffin
well its been nearly one hour and its peace i personally cant see it working the lebonese will be unable/unwilling to dissarm Hezbollah and the French will not deploy untill its safe to do so. meanwhile Hezbollah will goad Israel into retaliation . israel will then have to increase its deployment/invasion or withdraw. my guess would be a full scale invasion of most of southern Lebenon
 

TashaN

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Jon said:
If Islam is a religion of peace why does Iran want to kill Jews?

If christianity is the religion of turning the other cheek for the enemy why does USA want to kill all Muslims and make a new salve-Middle East?
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
c0da said:
I think to ask Israel to release every Lebanese prisoner would be unreasonable. It may well be the case that some of them have been wrongly kidnapped, but I can't imagine that every one of them is innocent - the IDF have taken them for a reason.

It is normal international law to return prisoners after a conflict.
Israel does not recognise that.
No does it recognise that it is a crime to capture (arrest in their terms)members of a foreign government.

In the circumstances they can hardly expect the return of their own soldiers who are captured.
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
The Truth said:
If christianity is the religion of turning the other cheek for the enemy why does USA want to kill all Muslims and make a new salve-Middle East?

I do not believe That most Muslims nor the USA want to kill each other.

The Palastinians and Israel have a serious relationship problem.
And the USA have a serious problem with percieved terrorists.
There is a serious cultural problem between the Moselim nations and the West.

How to arrive at Peace is the important issue, not how to kill more people.
 

jewscout

Religious Zionist
the peace plan will stop the hostilities for now...but this will happen again and again and again and again.
 

Booko

Deviled Hen
The Truth said:
If christianity is the religion of turning the other cheek for the enemy why does USA want to kill all Muslims and make a new salve-Middle East?

You make some assumptions here that I think are unwarranted:

1. The US gov't is a Christian gov't that acts on Christian principles.

(It isn't and it doesn't. And unlike certain other nations who claim to be Muslim nations and still perpetrate violent acts on their neighbors, the US gov't doesn't claim to be a Christian gov't, though obviously in order to get elected certain politicians make noise about this.)

2. The US wants to kill all Muslims

(if there were no oil, they'd be happy enough to see you fare as well as, say, some nations in Africa. Rwanda comes to mind. They really don't give a rat's ear what relgion people in other countries follow, unless it affects their plans for hegemony in some way.)

3. The US wants to make a new Middle East.

(Incorrect. The neo-cons want to make a new Middle East. And then there's the rest of the nation, which is most of it. The neo-cons happen to have had some influence in this adminstration, but that influence is waning as it becomes more apparent their plans were ill-conceived in the first place.)

4. Christianity teaches that nations should turn the other cheek.

(Turning the other cheek is the responsibility of the *individual* not the state. Please read up on great Christian thinkers when it comes to "Just War" St. Augustine is probably the place to start, but there have been others. If you need a link, let me know.)

I hope this helps to clear up a few misconceptions about the relationship between the US gov't, Americans generally, Muslims, the Middle East, and Christianity.
 

kai

ragamuffin
Terrywoodenpic said:
It is normal international law to return prisoners after a conflict.
Israel does not recognise that.
It is indeed normal to return pows after a conflict not terrorists hezbollah are not the Lebonese armed forces and no country recognises that
No does it recognise that it is a crime to capture (arrest in their terms)members of a foreign government. please explain unless you mean Adolf Eichmann

In the circumstances they can hardly expect the return of their own soldiers who are captured.
they are not "captured" Hezbollah are not regular soldiers they are not empowered by their government to capture anyone
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
kai said:
they are not "captured" Hezbollah are not regular soldiers they are not empowered by their government to capture anyone

No does it recognise that it is a crime to capture (arrest in their terms)members of a foreign government. please explain unless you mean ....

No I mean members of the palastinian parliament.who were recently arrested in their own homes, by the Isralies.

The Hesbollah may not be Government troups but they are certainly recognised
by the lebonese people and are represented in their parliament.

To day Israel is offering to exchange some prisoners, so they plainly recognise Hesbollah in some way.
The correct thing to do would be to exchange all prisoners through the red cross.
 

TashaN

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Booko said:
though obviously in order to get elected certain politicians make noise about this.

Not only noise, once they are elcted they can apply whatever they want through their policies. So simple.

if there were no oil, they'd be happy enough to see you fare as well as, say, some nations in Africa. Rwanda comes to mind. They really don't give a rat's ear what relgion people in other countries follow, unless it affects their plans for hegemony in some way.

So just because Muslims have oil so it's ok to kill them?

Turning the other cheek is the responsibility of the *individual* not the state.

I see, for us Muslims peace is not just an individual act but a universal one. :)

I hope this helps to clear up a few misconceptions about the relationship between the US gov't, Americans generally, Muslims, the Middle East, and Christianity.

The US wants to make a new Middle East.

Incorrect.

David Barton & the 'Myth' of Church-State Separation
http://www.beliefnet.com/story/154/story_15469_1.html


CIA's tactics against the Middle East
http://www.evz.ro/article.php?artid=256217

New Middle East
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
 

Booko

Deviled Hen
The Truth said:
Not only noise, once they are elcted they can apply whatever they want through their policies. So simple.

Not if they want their party to stay in power. Not so simple as you might think.

So just because Muslims have oil so it's ok to kill them?

I wish you would stop putting words in my mouth. I simply pointed out a political reality. I didn't voice my approval or disapproval of it.

I see, for us Muslims peace is not just an individual act but a universal one. :)

It is for Baha'is as well. I'd go further and say it's our raison d'etre.
 

kai

ragamuffin
Terrywoodenpic said:
No does it recognise that it is a crime to capture (arrest in their terms)members of a foreign government. please explain unless you mean ....

No I mean members of the palastinian parliament.who were recently arrested in their own homes, by the Isralies.are these Hamas members who are of course reponsible for firing rockets into Israel

The Hesbollah may not be Government troups but they are certainly recognised
by the lebonese people and are represented in their parliament.I dont think anyone in Lebenon has any choice other than recognisibg Hezbollah

To day Israel is offering to exchange some prisoners, so they plainly recognise Hesbollah in some way.
The correct thing to do would be to exchange all prisoners through the red cross.


Israel is negotiatinh with the Lebonese government and i agree about the red cross
 

TashaN

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Booko said:
I wish you would stop putting words in my mouth. I simply pointed out a political reality. I didn't voice my approval or disapproval of it.

What the heck?

How do i supposed to know whether this is your opnion or theirs?
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
kai said:


No I mean members of the palastinian parliament.who were recently arrested in their own homes, by the Isralies.are these Hamas members who are of course reponsible for firing rockets into Israel

Hamas were not involved with firing rockets in lebanon.
The Hesbollah may not be Government troups but they are certainly recognised by the lebonese people and are represented in their parliament.I dont think anyone in Lebenon has any choice other than recognisibg Hezbollah
The lebonese in general,including Christians were supporting Hisbollah's stance against the Isralie invasion. there was no coersion involved.

Israel is negotiatinh with the Lebonese government and i agree about the red cross
As the Lebonese government hold no prisoners that would be fruitless.
They may be negotiating through the Lebonese government, but not with it.
 

c0da

Active Member
Terry said:
It is normal international law to return prisoners after a conflict.
Israel does not recognise that.
No does it recognise that it is a crime to capture (arrest in their terms)members of a foreign government.

In the circumstances they can hardly expect the return of their own soldiers who are captured.

Terry, The international laws protect prisoners of war...., not terrorists.

"In principle to be entitled to prisoner of war status the captured service member must have conducted operations according to the laws and customs of war, e.g. be part of a chain of command, wear a uniform and bear arms openly. Thus, franc-tireurs, terrorists and spies may be excluded" - From Wiki.
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
c0da said:
Terry, The international laws protect prisoners of war...., not terrorists.

"In principle to be entitled to prisoner of war status the captured service member must have conducted operations according to the laws and customs of war, e.g. be part of a chain of command, wear a uniform and bear arms openly. Thus, franc-tireurs, terrorists and spies may be excluded" - From Wiki.

Wiki is not a very accurate source.
A more pressing point, is that If you kill theirs they will kill yours.

I would not actually describe the hezbollah as terrorists, their fighting function is only a small part of their function amongst Lebonese Muslims.

They were the first in, finding homes for people, and relief as the Israelies withdrew. They had already started clearing debris and taping off dangerous areas.
hardly the action of terrorists.
 
Top