Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
Apparently as I don't do belief.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Understanding Cosmology (Post 1)
- Thread starter Meow Mix
- Start date
Audie
Veteran Member
Ig city
Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
Ditto
likely, that they're putting you on ignore...
or they're just not going to respond to you any more...
Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
^ Hmmm, does anyone besides lovely lady atheists know what 'Ig city' means?
Oh noooooooooooo, they couldn't be so mean? Could it possibly be a term of endearment?
This is true, we get enough haters so ignore it is from religious quaters. Saves a lot of hassle
Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
I do not hate you. quite the contrary, all atheists are as much an expression of Universal Existence/God as I am, so I do not hate, but love you.
As the expression goes, "do not love the belief, but love the believer".
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Hating a belief is about as useful as hating math.
Nothing new is in the heavens above or the earth below. The billions of years of the history of the universe, the sun and the earth, and the evolution of life and humanity.
Though our future on earth is a bit sketchy if we do not take better care of the earth,
Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
Transcending belief is not hating belief, beliefs serve their purpose until the reality for which the belief stands, is realized.
Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
See, I don't hate your belief, but it is not reality.
Not my belief it is science. We cannot make our own reality.
Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
I don't like to argue, but it is your belief in a scientific explanation, I like science, but I understand it is in a state of evolution, ie., not complete. Absolute reality is what it is.
You don't like to argue? You are arguing.
Science is not ever complete or absolute. Science is consistent and reliable. Science advances with new knowledge, but science does not change as much as want to see it change. It more reflects your belief as complete and absolute.
Yes, reality is what it is, but we cannot create reality based on what we believe.
Last edited:
Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
Let's not argue about arguing, ok!
I don't do belief in the context of contemporary scientific theory as it has an atheistic bias, I consider it and appreciate it, but there is so much more.
Precisely, and a lot of the scientific positions on cosmology require belief, reality is on the other side of the belief/theory.
first problem, Methodological Naturalism is neutral concerning religious belief. I am atheist and a scientist with over fifty years experience, and I accept science concerning the nature of our physical existence, and believe in God's Creation in harmony with science.
No, scientific knowledge of cosmology is not based on belief by definition. It is based on the consistent objective verifiable evidence.
You are going to be very disappointed with the reality of the evolving knowledge of science.
Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
Well that's a start, glad to hear you are not an atheist, not that I have anything personal against atheists, but it is somewhat sad that their present closed mind prevents them from transcending their limitations, and realizing the open ended reality on the other side.
Of course it is, atheistic science believes there was a beginning to the Cosmos, they believe the Cosmos is not conscious, etc..
News alert, an eternal Cosmos is complete, absolute reality does not evolve, only parts evolve to learn what and who they really are, in an eternal process.