Perhaps, but it is limited to that in which a reasonable party is involved in my view. In other words to me if it can't be demonstrated to a reasonable person it's not knowledge whether that person is the first party or the second.
Im the combined lot of every part of my body at best in my view.
If science doesn't know it it is not necessarily knowable. I'd consider it unlikely that you have any significantly greater knowledge of the cosmos than our top scientists do in my view (and perhaps even that is being generous)
I see myself as part of the whole, but I see the whole as the combined lot of its parts. I see no benefit to confusing the two (whole and parts of the whole).
Also the cosmos is not my God simply because I do not choose it to be that.
When it comes to religious meditation, one must transcend duality, so long as there is a 'you' wanting or not wanting, reason, knowledge, view, demonstration, spiritual realization, etc., spiritual realization is impossible.
What you call scientific knowledge is dualistic in nature, it is conceptual, equations, descriptions, etc., these may represent some reality but they are not the reality they represent. But to be clear, science has its place, as does religion, if anyone takes the position that science can realize that which religious practice can realize, they are mistaken, as would anyone who imagines religion can provide the knowledge to build an airplane.
Don't try and mix the science and religious practice.
If you have not realized that represented by the concept God, then you are no in a position to choose, for it is yet merely a concept in your mind, the reality of which is still unrealized.
