No, again, I am talking about people entering legally. He wants that stopped. He is in the wrong.
What's your source on that?
Because nobody wants to end immigration.
Just illegal immigration.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No, again, I am talking about people entering legally. He wants that stopped. He is in the wrong.
What about the legal asylum seekers Trump called scams and hoaxes? I repeat LEGAL. He is going against our Constitution. As a born American, I resent that. No, I'm not going back to some other country and yes, I have freedom of speech. So, I can say that. I can say as much as I would like. That doesn't mean that I hate my country. That means that I want my country to be better. That is completely patriotic.
The question was "What does immigration mean in that context?"
I don't believe that 13 million Asians moved here permanently in 2014. I can believe that many Asians immigrated here temporarily, tourists and visitors and such. And I'm sure that a fair number came here and overstayed visas.
But the implications of the statistics don't make any sense, and I'm quite confident that it's fake news. The sort that Trump is famous for.
Tom
What's your source on that?
Because nobody wants to end immigration.
Just illegal immigration.
Scams and hoaxes are simply those who say "they are persecuted" when in reality that they aren't. They may have legally applied but would be denied because within their application they have lied in "why" they are seeking asylum.
It's not just the last couple of presidential administrations
Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump,
nobody is willing to take on the real problem.
This leads me to believe that it isn't about the political leadership. It's about the people who really run this country.
Unelected, barely known, super rich, people who tell the government what to do. Those are the people who benefit from the current immigration schizophrenic policy.
Flat wages, high consumption, serf level workforce with no legal rights....
That's why the government won't do anything effective and comprehensive and humane about the problem. Doing so wouldn't suit the very wealthy.
Tom
There would be differences in how they immigrate.
This could be significant. Are some groups immigrating
legally while others aren't? The posted statistics don't
address this.
What appears to concern him is the porous southern
border, which is not limited to central Americans.
I agree with you in terms of immigrants. However the contention arose over illegals literally jumping the border.
If the price of produce went up to the free market price, they would do a lot better.
Their problem is that they are competing on a black market. Other produce growers, who are willing to hire cheap illegal labor, can undercut the honest folks. That puts honest folks out of business.
That's capitalism. The ruthless win and the nice guys lose.
It's why I don't see Christian ethics and Capitalism as remotely compatible. They're mutually exclusive.
Tom
Exactly. They determine whether it is true (since many people lie on applications) or not.I think that the INS checks them out.
Asians and Europeans come here legally for the most part. They are usually educated and can support themselves. They contribute to society.12,750,000 Asian in 2014
Asian Immigrants in the United States
4,785,000 Europen in 2016
European Immigrants in the United States
1,020,000 Africans in 2009
African Immigrants in the United States
By the end of 2019, there are expected to be 539,500 people displaced from Central America.
Central America Refugee Crisis: Aid, Statistics and News | USA for UNHCR
"Immigrants from South America remain a small share of the U.S. foreign-born population, but with a noticeable uptick in arrivals in recent years from deeply troubled Venezuela. The number of Venezuelan immigrants in the United States rose from 216,000 in 2014 to 351,000 in 2017, with a growth of 61,000 in one year alone, from 2016 to 2017.Still, the United States is not the primary destination for Venezuelans leaving an increasingly failing state, with most of the members of Latin America’s largest exodus (at least 2 million people since 2015) fleeing to locations elsewhere in the region, in particular Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, Chile, and Argentina."
South American Immigrants in the United States
South American Immigrants in the United States
In 2015, approximately 3.4 million Central Americans resided in the United States, representing 8 percent of the 43.3 million U.S. immigrants. Eighty-five percent of Central Americans in the United States were from the Northern Triangle, formed by El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras.
So, why is the POTUS so upset over Central American immigrants? Why not Europeans or Asians? Why don't we have room for Central Americans but we do for people from other places? Does he forget that we have airplanes flying people in from other places? Why do we have room for other people but our country is too full for Central Americans? What is that?
Really ? Did Jesus say that the government has the obligation to support citizens of another country that thrust themselves upon that country ?I absolutely agree with you. I don't understand conservative Christians. They are the opposite of what Jesus said.
Asians and Europeans come here legally for the most part. They are usually educated and can support themselves. They contribute to society.
Central Americans on the other hand are usually poorly educated, have no marketable skills except at the lowest rung in the workforce.
So, they become net absorbers of tax money set aside to help American citizens.
If they work, as most do that work, it is in the lowest paying jobs, they pay no income taxes. Few own homes, so they don´t pay property taxes which pays for the education their children are receiving. Virtually all take benefits in some form,or multiple forms, food stamps, housing allowances, welfare, medical, etc.
I suggest you look at some studies regarding which immigrants cost the most when they arrive.
It is purely an economic issue, Central Americans cannot support themselves properly in America. Thus America, in the form of taxpayers spends billions every year in supporting them.
I suggest you look at studies regarding the relative employment status of immigrant Europeans, Asians, and Central Americans.
Thank you but I think some people do want to end legal immigration and, to me, the United States is a country founded on immigration.
The statement is utter nonsense. The numbers of legal immigrants that can be accepted was recently raised, and is scheduled to be raised again next year.That sounds rather histrionic.
But if you care to substantiate, I'm listening....actually reading, but you know....popular phrasing.
Do you know that most local, county, and state agencies never ask the immigration status of those seeking assistance ? In sanctuary cities and states, you can be fired for doing so ?Actually, I have friends from Central America, Asia, Europe and other places. When people come here from other countries some are well educated but their degrees are not recognized by the United States unless they are specifically brought here by employers seeking their skills and education.
Also, "Are legal immigrants eligible for federal public benefit programs?
Only those with lawful permanent resident (LPR) status, but not until they have resided as a legal resident for five years."
Illegal immigrants are not entitled to any social services benefits.
https://immigrationforum.org/article/fact-sheet-immigrants-and-public-benefits/
Where do people get all this bogus stuff? It must be fake news.
Conspiracies are always so much more appealing than alternatives,It's not just the last couple of presidential administrations
Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump,
nobody is willing to take on the real problem.
This leads me to believe that it isn't about the political leadership. It's about the people who really run this country.
Unelected, barely known, super rich, people who tell the government what to do. Those are the people who benefit from the current immigration schizophrenic policy.
Flat wages, high consumption, serf level workforce with no legal rights....
That's why the government won't do anything effective and comprehensive and humane about the problem. Doing so wouldn't suit the very wealthy.
Tom