SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
My view is pro-CHOICE. Get it right. Your body, your choice. Man or woman. Reject whatever you want - it only matters when it comes to your own body. Leave other people's bodies alone, they aren't yours.Green New Deal. It died without a whimper despite all the lip service media and Dems provided.
Nope. Try again. You think men can not learn about biology. You are wrong in that.
Yes and I countered it by pointing out education isn't unique to SCOTUS memebers. More so Roe vs Wade was based on privacy clauses not basic biology. Try again. Maybe explain about this knowledge you never provide by draw from ether.
Such as what? Something more than an assertion
Evidence?
No there isn't more to it. Sex can result in pregnancy. Abortion is ending that pregnancy. It isn't that hard.
I have little issues with medical condition that risk both the parent and child. If a risk to the parent only the parent can decide. Financials concerns I reject. Timing concerns I reject. I reject the below as it pre-existing.
She can stop having sex. That is one way people avoid self-harm... by not doing the thing which can cause that harm.
Except that is the point you made above. Sex can lead to pregnancy which caused harm to your mother. Ergo does not want to deal with the results of an action. Get a dildo. Get her tubes cut.
No it is. Action to result. Stop the action and the result does not occur.
You asserted twice and I have rejected it. Deal with it.
That whatever knowledge you babble about counters my view point. So far as per the above it hasn't. This is because all your arguments are framed based on wanting to have sex regardless of results instead of if abortion of another human is justified based on the whim of another. Hence why your only option is pro-abortion which I provided alternatives. Desire is primary not life.
No. The tweet is gone so I have no idea if it was a response to X or just a random tweet. Ergo I can not confirm anything the media claims is context. NYT claims it was made during the conflict in 2012 in Gaza. Omar claims this as well. I can not confirm either.
You can go chasing for "context" if you want. The trope does not change.
I ask again. What have the Squad done that is special in Congress?
I'm done talking with someone who can't be bothered to actually take in and process what is being said to them and instead repeats himself; that won't even consider nuance in cases where it obviously exists; and doesn't care to understand the entire scope of the subject matter under discussion. You obviously aren't open to learning or enlightenment. You can't even admit that your paraphrasing of something I said wasn't accurate, nor will you acknowledge the part that you accidentally left out.
So once again, we're done.
Bye.