• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Up to 10million per year could die from this

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
read the above posts... no need to do it again.


I did, i asked for evidence nor belief.

Tell you what. An experiment.

Today i have been diagnosed with gallstones. In 3 weeks i visit the consultant to discuss options. You pray that my gallstones disappear and when the consultant scans my gallbladder i will tell you if faith worked. If not i will have whatever op the consultant recommends... Is that a fair test?
 
Last edited:

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
I did read, opinion is not evidence

Anyway, edited my last post while you were answering, would you care to read the last paragraph and say yes or no?
That would be like saying... "Dear doctor, I know I have appendicitis and that you take it out. I tell you what, doctors, operate on my appendix so that my cancer will be removed."

Reminds me of a quote from a great man,
"But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant."
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I did, i asked for evidence nor belief.

Tell you what. An experiment.

Today i have been diagnosed with gallstones. In 3 weeks i visit the consultant to discuss options. You pray that my gallstones disappear and when the consultant scans my gallbladder i will tell you if faith worked. If not i will have whatever op the consultant recommends... Is that a fair test?
I can just picture a possible response.

"Thou shalt not test thy God".

It's kind of a win-win each time with these kind of debates.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
That would be like saying... "Dear doctor, I know I have appendicitis and that you take it out. I tell you what, doctors, operate on my appendix so that my cancer will be removed."

Reminds me of a quote from a great man,
"But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant."


No, totally wrong, it would be like asking you to put your claim of faith healing to the test on a minor medical problem with no comeback on you if your faith healing fails

You are unwilling to even try so we can assume you do not actually have any faith in faith healing.

Dont you just wish people were more honest when it comes to medicine?
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
No, totally wrong, it would be like asking you to put your claim of faith healing to the test on a minor medical problem with no comeback on you if your faith healing fails

You are unwilling to even try so we can assume you do not actually have any faith in faith healing.

Dont you just wish people were more honest when it comes to medicine?
When I see an honest question - one that hasn’t been already answered...

Then we can dialogue
 
Last edited:

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
I am at a loss at the statement that I ignore people whose faith beliefs were not answered. Where did I say that? Why do you say that?

When you focus on the people whose faith you think was answered (e.g. their inoperable brain tumour was cured), while ignoring the people whose faith didn't save their lives (e.g. those who died from their inoperable brain tumours) and then declaring that faith saves lives.

Not true. We know that chemo works because people are healed (albeit not always). We know that faith works because people are healed (albeit not always). Why is it different?

What I’m asking you for is by what method you have tested your faith claims and demonstrated that faith produces any kind of result whatsoever in these instances.

Have you demonstrated how faith works, what it is and how it operates?

With chemo, doctors can say what the average survival rate is for certain types of treatment for certain types of cancer. So how do we determine the survival rate for faith?

I’ll give you some examples to illustrate what I’m talking about. My father had a massive stroke and as his brain was deteriorating we had to take him off life support and basically wait for him to die. As he died, my deeply religious uncle frantically prayed over him, imploring Jesus to save his life. My father died 7 minutes later at the age of 56. A year later, as my grandfather (my uncle’s father) lay dying, my uncle insisted that every day we all join hands and pray over him for his recovery (prostate cancer). My grandfather ended up dying. Same goes for my grandmother a couple of years later. Lots of praying, but she ended up dying as well. So from my point of view, faith doesn’t have a great track record in the healing department. But you say it does. So how do we settle this discrepancy?

What I want to know is, how can we test your faith claims and determine they are what you say they are?

Think of it this way. Mind can be stronger than the physical. Many times the very will to live can push normal physical capacity beyond its ability. Maybe you have heard "Now it is up to him and his will to live" - the will, or mind, alters the capacity of the body.

Likewise, the spirit is stronger than both mind and physical. It has the capacity to change the natural course of sickness.

What is a spirit and how do we know we have one?

And does that mean God doesn’t play a role in these supposed miracles then? That it all boils down to mind over matter?

Through empirical evidence. We prayed after the declaration that the woman was going to die in 6 month (or there about -- it's been a while so the exact month count may be off by a month) because of the inoperable tumor and then, after prayer, it shrunk and disappeared and the doctors had no medical explanation.
Empirical evidence? What you have are anecdotes. I could just as easily say, “Well we prayed over my dad and he died so faith doesn’t produce medical miracles.”

So you prayed over the woman and she lived. So how about all the people all over the world at any given moment that are praying that their starving children will survive to adulthood? And yet millions of starving children die every day. Where does that fit into your empirical evidence?

You do know that cancer has been known to spontaneously regress, right? It is well documented.

Immunity over inability: The spontaneous regression of cancer
Spontaneous regression of tumour and the role of microbial infection – possibilities for cancer treatment


We prayer for another woman with stage four cancer, and a month later they said "We don't understand it, but it is completely gone". And the list goes on and on.

This looks like confirmation bias to me.

I mean, you have to realize that at any given moment, there have to be thousands (maybe millions) of people all over the world praying for the survival of their loved ones, many of whom are children, who will ultimately die. They don’t get any miracles. But that lady you prayed over was definitely cured by God? How does that make any kind of sense?

A miracle from God, as defined by Christians, is when the natural course of nature is violated. Adrenaline for momentary strength is not a miracle. It is the natural course of nature.

Okay, so then in the case of the women you prayed over, there is a natural explanation for their survival – spontaneous regression. So we have no need to invoke faith or miracles in such cases. It’s just the natural course of nature.

Smith Wigglesworth going to a wake, grabbing a dead person and putting him up on a wall and shouting, "Arise and live" - and on the third time his eyes open and he lives, is called a miracle.

Are you seriously saying that Smith Wigglesworth raised the dead? Where is this documented? Why doesn’t it appear in the science literature? It seems such an amazing feat would be known and studied all over the world.

Sorry but anecdotes from the 19th Century don’t cut it for me.

My friend who had a third failure in bridging her broken spinal cord and the doctors said "Don't lift anything over 5lbs, don't have babies, don't do any physical work" and after going to a service, went to her hotel room, fell to the floor crying out to God when she realized all pain was gone and John Hopkins Hospital says, "We have no idea what happened, its a miracle, you spinal cord is completely normal" and two babies later she still is normal and pushes a lawn mower, violates nature and would be classified as a miracle.
Where is this documented that I can look at? It sounds like the third attempt to bridge her broken spinal cord wasn’t a failure after all, now does it?

I would assume that there are many definitions to try to let the hearer understand. One that I like is:

Hebrews 11:1 Amplified Bible, Classic Edition (AMPC)

11 Now faith is the assurance (the confirmation, the title deed) of the things [we] hope for, being the proof of things [we] do not see and the conviction of their reality [faith perceiving as real fact what is not revealed to the senses].

That doesn’t make much sense to me. So faith is believing in things you can’t observe or test?

How is faith a pathway to truth? Is there anything that can’t be believed on faith?
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
The guy who is unwilling to test his claim publicly is accusing me of dishonesty? Wow
I test it publicly every time I pray for someone.

But apparently, you don't understand the first thing about prayer by your statement:#35

And, yes, when there is an honest question, I am happy to dialogue.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
I test it publicly every time I pray for someone.

But apparently, you don't understand the first thing about prayer by your statement:#35

And, yes, when there is an honest question, I am happy to dialogue.

I am sure you think you are working miracles.

Ok i do know the power of prayer

diseases-eradicated-or-diseases-eradicated-or-decimated-by-science-decimated-20355211.png

i provided an honest statement, you refuse to accept it.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
When you focus on the people whose faith you think was answered (e.g. their inoperable brain tumour was cured), while ignoring the people whose faith didn't save their lives (e.g. those who died from their inoperable brain tumours) and then declaring that faith saves lives.
Again... that is like saying "when you focus on the ones that are cured by using chemo, you ignore the people that chemo didn't save their lives and then declaring that chemo saves lives.

We do say that of chemo and we do say that of faith.

I’ll give you some examples to illustrate what I’m talking about. My father had a massive stroke and as his brain was deteriorating we had to take him off life support and basically wait for him to die. As he died, my deeply religious uncle frantically prayed over him, imploring Jesus to save his life. My father died 7 minutes later at the age of 56. A year later, as my grandfather (my uncle’s father) lay dying, my uncle insisted that every day we all join hands and pray over him for his recovery (prostate cancer). My grandfather ended up dying. Same goes for my grandmother a couple of years later. Lots of praying, but she ended up dying as well. So from my point of view, faith doesn’t have a great track record in the healing department. But you say it does. So how do we settle this discrepancy?

I can understand your position as many people go through that same pain and then wonder. Certainly I'm sorry for the pain of lost loved ones. I also have lost loved ones.

There are many reasons in the Bible that expresses why there are cases that it just doesn't produce the desired results. Just like there are many cases that chemo doesn't produce the desired results, but we don't throw out chemo because someone else died even when they used chemo.

Certainly I don't know your grandparents and your father and all the nuances to suggest possibilities but in my experiences, I have found a few:

For an example: One person never ate vegetables (natural anti-oxidants) and loved sugar (a cancer enhancer). We did pray but he still didn't want to eat vegetables and still ate ice-cream.Prayer, IMV, is useless in this case.

Another example - more of a biblical explanation: Unforgiveness is a faith short circuit. Unforgiveness can be hidden in someones heart and yet no one knows that it is there. Thus Jesus said "And when you pray, forgive..." Mark 11:25 Some people's faith is short-circuited through unforgiveness.

Some people are not really praying with faith as Jesus said, "Matthew 6:7 But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking."

Then there are those who really don't believe: Matthew 13:58 And he did not many mighty works there because of their unbelief.

Not saying that any of the above fits what happened.. there are many other issues that could have prevented God's move. I'm just saying that sometimes it doesn't work like sometimes chemo doesn't work.

What I’m asking you for is by what method you have tested your faith claims and demonstrated that faith produces any kind of result whatsoever in these instances.

Have you demonstrated how faith works, what it is and how it operates?

With chemo, doctors can say what the average survival rate is for certain types of treatment for certain types of cancer. So how do we determine the survival rate for faith?

Yes, we teach on how faith works, what it is and how it operates. Teaching is what Jesus did and teaching increases capacity.

As far as testing... we teach, people pray, and when we ask "Please raise your hand if you have experienced a supernatural healing moment" hands go up everywhere.

What I want to know is, how can we test your faith claims and determine they are what you say they are?

I would say learn about faith and then test it yourself? I'm not sure how you want me to answer that question

What is a spirit and how do we know we have one?

And does that mean God doesn’t play a role in these supposed miracles then? That it all boils down to mind over matter?

No... I expressed that the spirit and faith is greater than mind over matter. Yes, God plays a role and, for Christians, we determine we have a spirit through the word and through experience.

Empirical evidence? What you have are anecdotes. I could just as easily say, “Well we prayed over my dad and he died so faith doesn’t produce medical miracles.”

So you prayed over the woman and she lived. So how about all the people all over the world at any given moment that are praying that their starving children will survive to adulthood? And yet millions of starving children die every day. Where does that fit into your empirical evidence?

You do know that cancer has been known to spontaneously regress, right? It is well documented.

Immunity over inability: The spontaneous regression of cancer
Spontaneous regression of tumour and the role of microbial infection – possibilities for cancer treatment

I think these really aren't questions but rather you are saying "I don't believe it" and so the questions aren't really questions

This looks like confirmation bias to me.

I mean, you have to realize that at any given moment, there have to be thousands (maybe millions) of people all over the world praying for the survival of their loved ones, many of whom are children, who will ultimately die. They don’t get any miracles. But that lady you prayed over was definitely cured by God? How does that make any kind of sense?
Again... I have prayed prayers that were useless and now I know why. There are reasons why people don't receive and we thank God that wisdom is given to man to help people get healed (although thousands, maybe millions, still die) even by doctor hands

Okay, so then in the case of the women you prayed over, there is a natural explanation for their survival – spontaneous regression. So we have no need to invoke faith or miracles in such cases. It’s just the natural course of nature.

How do you know it wasn't a miracle? Is "spontaneous regression" a medical term of "I don't know why it happened, but it happened"?

Are you seriously saying that Smith Wigglesworth raised the dead? Where is this documented? Why doesn’t it appear in the science literature? It seems such an amazing feat would be known and studied all over the world.

Sorry but anecdotes from the 19th Century don’t cut it for me.

OK... no problem.

Where is this documented that I can look at? It sounds like the third attempt to bridge her broken spinal cord wasn’t a failure after all, now does it?

John Hopkins Hospital. And this sounds more like "No matter what you say, I'm not going to believe you".

So, whether the child thrown from the third floor at the Mall of America a couple of weeks ago, placed in an induced comma in an ICU to perform a 5 hour body check and finding that absolutely no brain, or bone damage and the fall's effects was like falling from a bike and the doctor saying "It is truly a miracle" makes no difference to you.

This would qualify as a reason why wouldn't be able to receive a miracle.

That doesn’t make much sense to me. So faith is believing in things you can’t observe or test?

How is faith a pathway to truth? Is there anything that can’t be believed on faith?

Are these really questions? Because these plethora of answers doesn't really convince me you are really seeking.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
I am sure you think you are working miracles.

Ok i do know the power of prayer

View attachment 28752

i provided an honest statement, you refuse to accept it.

LOL... well... be it unto you as you have believed.

You say it doesn't work but it has worked for me. I guess you are a little too late to tell me that.
 

Rational Agnostic

Well-Known Member
Again... that is like saying "when you focus on the ones that are cured by using chemo, you ignore the people that chemo didn't save their lives and then declaring that chemo saves lives.

We do say that of chemo and we do say that of faith.



.

Incorrect comparison. We know and understand the causal mechanism by which chemo kills cancer cells. However, faith and prayer have no known causal mechanisms. There is no way to prove that "faith healings" are real or coincidences. However, given that we know of no causal mechanism by which faith can physiologically heal a person, we can be dang near 100% certain that faith and prayers do not cure diseases. ESPECIALLY since prayers for the regeneration of severed limbs are never answered.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Incorrect comparison. We know and understand the causal mechanism by which chemo kills cancer cells. However, faith and prayer have no known causal mechanisms. There is no way to prove that "faith healings" are real or coincidences. However, given that we know of no causal mechanism by which faith can physiologically heal a person, we can be dang near 100% certain that faith and prayers do not cure diseases. ESPECIALLY since prayers for the regeneration of severed limbs are never answered.

I disagree. It would be better if you said "I don't know of causal mechanisms" or "I really don't understand how faith works".

What you have presented is called a part-to-whole fallacy.

It would be like me saying, "since chemo doesn't grow limbs, chemo doesn't work".

Prayer against sickness is totally different than prayer for growing limbs. It would be like treating cancers with aspirin.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
LOL... well... be it unto you as you have believed.

You say it doesn't work but it has worked for me. I guess you are a little too late to tell me that.

Your belief is yours, enjoy? Don't forget to contact a doctor when you are ill
 

Rational Agnostic

Well-Known Member
I disagree. It would be better if you said "I don't know of causal mechanisms" or "I really don't understand how faith works".

What you have presented is called a part-to-whole fallacy.

It would be like me saying, "since chemo doesn't grow limbs, chemo doesn't work".

Prayer against sickness is totally different than prayer for growing limbs. It would be like treating cancers with aspirin.

Nice reading, buddy. I said "faith and prayer have no KNOWN causal mechanisms." We "KNOW of no causal mechanism...." And chemo was never intended to grow limbs, so of course it won't grow limbs. But given that you admit prayer for growing limbs is liking treating cancer with aspirin, you're essentially admitting that prayer doesn't work. Because if it worked, and God was real and all-powerful, he could do UNAMBIGUOUS healings like growing back limbs. The "prayer healings" you allude to however, are ambiguous, and could just as easily be coincidences. You could obtain the same results by praying to a flagpole. Oh, look! It works....sometimes. LOL:tearsofjoy:
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Nice reading, buddy. I said "faith and prayer have no KNOWN causal mechanisms." We "KNOW of no causal mechanism...."
As I said... you would be better if you said "I don't KNOW of any causal mechanism" - but that doesn't mean there aren't any.

And chemo was never intended to grow limbs, so of course it won't grow limbs.
Again... Part-to-whole fallacy. First we are talking about sickness and now you want to move the goal post.

But given that you admit prayer for growing limbs is liking treating cancer with aspirin, you're essentially admitting that prayer doesn't work.

Thus, since you can't treat cancer with aspirin, you're essentially admitting that chemo doesn't work.

:D Just using your logic however crazy it might be :D

Because if it worked, and God was real and all-powerful, he could do UNAMBIGUOUS healings like growing back limbs.
Shows you don't understand biblical principles.

The "prayer healings" you allude to however, are ambiguous, and could just as easily be coincidences. You could obtain the same results by praying to a flagpole. Oh, look! It works....sometimes. LOL:tearsofjoy:

Your logic is amazing. Out of this world. And yet prayer healings still occurs despite your opinion. :D
 
Last edited:

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I test it publicly every time I pray for someone.

But apparently, you don't understand the first thing about prayer by your statement:#35

And, yes, when there is an honest question, I am happy to dialogue.
You do not understand what a valid test is. There has to be a reasonable way for you to be shown to be wrong. Cherry picking the few wins is not confirmation. This is why creationism fails. Creationists are unwilling to put their ideas to the test because they are afraid of failure. People that truly want to know and have at least some trust in their ideas look forward to running tests on them. That is what scientists do. They don't demand that others 'prove them wrong' they try to prove themselves wrong and when they fail to do so that is when they start to think their ideas are correct.
 
Top