Colt
Well-Known Member
You are bias. It’s done many good things but its a proud human institution. God alone is the pillar or Rock.The church is the pillar and foundation of truth.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You are bias. It’s done many good things but its a proud human institution. God alone is the pillar or Rock.The church is the pillar and foundation of truth.
Of course, if there is in fact no "Holy Spirit," then the "truth" the church teaches is guided by nothing at all, except what the church wants.The Church teaches truth as it is guided by the Holy Spirit.
You are bias. It’s done many good things but its a proud human institution. God alone is the pillar or Rock.
We all are. Why do Christians ignore some of the scripture? He told you. You have one father. You are to pray, "our father." Why ignore multiple books telling you this? Jesus was an example, not an exception.He wasn't a "Christian" - he was The Christ! The son of the Living God.
People don't have to go somewhere to be guided by the Holy Spirit. The holy Spirit is love, the advocate.The Church teaches truth as it is guided by the Holy Spirit.
People don't have to go somewhere to be guided by the Holy Spirit. The holy Spirit is love, the advocate.
We all are. Why do Christians ignore some of the scripture? He told you. You have one father. You are to pray, "our father." Why ignore multiple books telling you this? Jesus was an example, not an exception.
I once believed as you do when I was an evangelical. However, I don’t think your position will hold up under further investigation.
Protestants often truncate quotes or cherry pick. Here are two among many.
Let’s start with Chrysostom:
And if one should say, 'How then did James receive the throne of Jerusalem?,' this I would answer that He appointed this man (Peter) teacher, not of that throne, but of the whole world. (Chrysostom, In Joan. Hom. 1xxxviii. n. 1, tom. viii)
Peter himself the Head or Crown of the Apostles, the First in the Church, the Friend of Christ, who received a revelation, not from man, but from the Father, as the Lord bears witness to him, saying, 'Blessed art thou, This very Peter and when I name Peter I name that unbroken Rock, that firm Foundation, the Great Apostle, First of the disciples, the First called, and the First who obeyed he was guilty ...even denying the Lord." (Chrysostom, T. ii. Hom)
I would have to disagree.I said “Jesus was foretelling the rejection of his Gospel, persecution and subsequent murder. Jesus and his Father had already worked out a contingency since the Jews were rejecting their calling. Jesus was dressing down Peter for suggesting that he take a different course of action then turning the other cheek on the cross. Christians converted the rejection into the atonement doctrine, the false claim that it was Gods will for his Son to be rejected and die as a sin debt payment so God could finally forgive people.”
I have no idea how this applies or what you are trying to say. Sorry.We all are. Why do Christians ignore some of the scripture? He told you. You have one father. You are to pray, "our father." Why ignore multiple books telling you this? Jesus was an example, not an exception.
Except when it lies....
I don't think either one of us is cherry picking... it was just a subject matter that was in dispute from the beginning...
As Origen said:
- Origen (185-254)
- “And if we too have said like Peter, ‘Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God,’ not as if flesh and blood had revealed it unto us, but by light from the Father in heaven having shone in our heart, we become a Peter, and to us there might be said by the Word, ‘Thou art Peter,’ etc. For a rock is every disciple of Christ of whom those drank who drank of the spiritual rock which followed them, and upon every such rock is built every word of the church, add the polity in accordance with it; for in each of the perfect, who have the combination of words and deeds and thoughts which fill up the blessedness, is the church built by God. But if you suppose that upon that one Peter only the whole church is built by God, what would you say about John the son of thunder or each one of the Apostles? Shall we otherwise dare to say, that against Peter in particular the gates of Hades shall not prevail, but that they shall prevail against the other Apostles and the perfect? Does not the saying previously made, ‘The gates of Hades shall not prevail against it,’ hold in regard to all and in the case of each of them? And also the saying, ‘Upon this rock I will build My church’? Are the keys of the kingdom of heaven given by the Lord to Peter only, and will no other of the blessed receive them? But if this promise, ‘I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven,’ be common to the others, how shall not all the things previously spoken of, and the things which are subjoined as having been addressed to Peter, be common to them? For in this place these words seem to be addressed as to Peter only, ‘Whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven,’ etc; but in the Gospel of John the Saviour having given the Holy Spirit unto the disciples by breathing upon them said, ‘Receive ye the Holy Spirit,’ etc, . . . And if any one says this to Him, not by flesh and blood revealing it unto Him but through the Father in heaven, he will obtain the things that were spoken according to the letter of the Gospel to that Peter, but, as the spirit of the Gospel teaches, to every one who becomes such as that Peter was.” (Commentary on Matthew, 12:10-11)
I have no idea how this applies or what you are trying to say. Sorry.
Isaiah was talking about Israel as the “suffering servant” being “wounded for our transgression and bruised for our iniquities.” The followers of Jesus forced him into OT scriptures that were not about him.I would have to disagree.
As John the Baptist said, "Behold the Lamb of God that takes away the sins of the world" and as Isaiah forted "He was wounded for our transgression and bruised for our iniquities."
There are just too many scriptures to take it the way you are saying it. IMO
Isaiah was talking about Israel as the “suffering servant” being “wounded for our transgression and bruised for our iniquities.” The followers of Jesus forced him into OT scriptures that were not about him.
Christians often quote everyone but Jesus?