• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

US court rules that surveillance program exposed by Snowden was illegal

Tambourine

Well-Known Member
Most of the risk were Iraq and Afghanistan civilians who were covertly passing information to the US.
Whom the US could have protected, had they wanted to.
But to the armed forces of the US the loss of foreign lives is always an acceptable sacrifice.
 

Tambourine

Well-Known Member
I would think a pardon is out of question, hadn't he ran and faced the system head on, a pardon might have been on the table.
I just ran across the story of Matt Diaz, a Navy judge who acted as a (failed) whistleblower in Guantanamo Bay, and I think it illustrates very well what usually happens in these cases:
The Weight of History | The Nib
G63.png

G80.png

G90.png

G92.png

G101.png

G104.png

G106-1317x664.png
 
Last edited:
Top