• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Vaccination and Religious Beliefs

psychoslice

Veteran Member
Bold faced lie in a sad attempt to flame bait.

Basically, the very definition of trolling.

Thank you for further demonstrating my point.
Your so funny, I bet everyone has a good old laugh at you, yea you put a real good show on, I am excited about the next episode.
 

Poisonshady313

Well-Known Member
aArZ4Z2_700b.jpg
 

philbo

High Priest of Cynicism
This is why I don't show much so called evidence because whatever I show is going to be trampled over, no matter what, as it is said, don't throw your pearls among swine.
"you don't show much so-called evidence"??? So far you have shown no evidence at all, and failed even to acknowledge let alone come up with any possible way the data in the study I linked to could be shown to be wrong.

You're the very worst kind of head-in-the-sand anti-vaxx conspiracy theorist: unable to refute the statistics, you pretend you haven't seen them and make sweeping gratuitous assertions about the motives of every single health professional in the business.
 

psychoslice

Veteran Member
"you don't show much so-called evidence"??? So far you have shown no evidence at all, and failed even to acknowledge let alone come up with any possible way the data in the study I linked to could be shown to be wrong.

You're the very worst kind of head-in-the-sand anti-vaxx conspiracy theorist: unable to refute the statistics, you pretend you haven't seen them and make sweeping gratuitous assertions about the motives of every single health professional in the business.
The evidence is there if your willing to look for it, I'm not going to copy and past, I do my own reading and I have my own opinion of what I have read, and that is all I am sharing, my opinion, got it ?.
 

Vishvavajra

Active Member
This is why I don't show much so called evidence because whatever I show is going to be trampled over, no matter what, as it is said, don't throw your pearls among swine.
You have pearls?

(Also, Jesus just died again because of your heinous misuse of his metaphor.)
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
This is why I don't show much so called evidence because whatever I show is going to be trampled over, no matter what, as it is said, don't throw your pearls among swine.
Is that not then a reason to get better sources? There's a reason why sources like Fox News aren't warmly welcomed here while .edu sites generally pass the source credibility test here. If it looks more like an advertisement, if it uses bad sources, if it clearly contradicts what you can see when you look around (in this case, we aren't seeing polo, except where the vaccines are not being used), contradicts what has become a highly rigorous area of study because people still doubt, and is based on lies, it isn't good. The thing with autism, for example, was started by a guy who did not do any research, he did not set up any experiment, he only put in extremely limited effort into gathering data, he didn't even compare his findings to the general population of those who have the vaccine and those who don't. There are some risks involved, and some people do have bad reactions. No one is denying that. But, I for one am glad that polo was not a part of my childhood and I don't know anyone with it. I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. And, as far as I know, we have more people on this forum who are at risk around those without the vaccines should that person be carrying than there are members who have had a bad reaction to the vaccines.
 
Top